GOP Senator says it doesn’t matter how bad the latest Obamacare replacement is – he’s

This is really hard to believe, the man must be senile.


If it's hard to believe, maybe there's a reason why you shouldn't believe it.

Here's what he really said: “I could maybe give you 10 reasons why this bill shouldn't be considered,” Grassley told the Des Moines Register. “But Republicans campaigned on this so often that you have a responsibility to carry out what you said in the campaign. That’s pretty much as much of a reason as the substance of the bill.”
 
It doesn't matter to him just how bad the bill is, or how many Americans will be affected and hurt by it, all that matters to him is repeal, regardless of the consequences.
 
It doesn't matter to him just how bad the bill is, or how many Americans will be affected and hurt by it, all that matters to him is repeal, regardless of the consequences.

That's clearly not what he said, is it?

“I could maybe give you 10 reasons why this bill shouldn't be considered,” Grassley told the Des Moines Register. “But Republicans campaigned on this so often that you have a responsibility to carry out what you said in the campaign. That’s pretty much as much of a reason as the substance of the bill.”

Is there a trusted adult nearby who can explain his words to you?
 
Obviously you have a different spin, but he committed himself to voting for anything that will repeal Obamacare. Its quite simple, sis.
 
Obviously you have a different spin, but he committed himself to voting for anything that will repeal Obamacare. Its quite simple, sis.

The verbatim quote is: “I could maybe give you 10 reasons why this bill shouldn't be considered,” Grassley told the Des Moines Register. “But Republicans campaigned on this so often that you have a responsibility to carry out what you said in the campaign. That’s pretty much as much of a reason as the substance of the bill.”

Spin is what you are trying to do.

You fail, just like Crooked Hillary failed last November.
 
It doesn't matter to him just how bad the bill is, or how many Americans will be affected and hurt by it, all that matters to him is repeal, regardless of the consequences.

Works for me. If you die in the process then so be it. I can live with it. I will be fine
 
That's clearly not what he said, is it?

“I could maybe give you 10 reasons why this bill shouldn't be considered,” Grassley told the Des Moines Register. “But Republicans campaigned on this so often that you have a responsibility to carry out what you said in the campaign. That’s pretty much as much of a reason as the substance of the bill.”

Is there a trusted adult nearby who can explain his words to you?

"I could give you 10 reasons why this bill shouldn't be considered..."

In other words it's that bad.

'"But Republicans campaigned on this so often that you have a responsibility to carry out what you said in the campaign."

But we promised, so we should carry out what we said.

Seems to confirm what floridafan said.
 
"I could give you 10 reasons why this bill shouldn't be considered..." In other words it's that bad. '"But Republicans campaigned on this so often that you have a responsibility to carry out what you said in the campaign." But we promised, so we should carry out what we said. Seems to confirm what floriduhfan said.


Only seems to DEMOCRATS, perhaps, Zappacrite. Just like it seemed to you that Russell Walker was a "Trumpkin", as you claimed on August 24th and have avoided proving ever since, Zappacrite?

Just like it seems to you that it's OK for Christiecrite and other so-called "progressives" to use threadbans without a word of rebuke from you, Zappacrite?

Just like it seems to you that starting multiple insult threads is infantile when a conservative does it, but not when you do it, Zappacrite?
 
Right on cue...

The moment GBA realizes he's lost YET ANOTHER argument, he immediately begins with his standard diversionary nonsense.
 
Right on cue...

The moment GBA realizes he's lost YET ANOTHER argument, he immediately begins with his standard diversionary nonsense.

Since I haven't lost any argument and my points are valid, why won't you answer my questions, Zappacrite?

Is Russell Walker a "Trumpkin", as you claimed on August 24th and have avoided proving ever since, Zappacrite?

Is it OK for Christiecrite and other so-called "progressives" to use threadbans without a word of rebuke from you, Zappacrite?

Do you think that starting multiple insult threads is infantile when a conservative does it, but not when you do it, Zappacrite?
 
Since I haven't lost any argument and my points are valid, why won't you answer my questions, Zappacrite?

Is Russell Walker a "Trumpkin", as you claimed on August 24th and have avoided proving ever since, Zappacrite?

Is it OK for Christiecrite and other so-called "progressives" to use threadbans without a word of rebuke from you, Zappacrite?

Do you think that starting multiple insult threads is infantile when a conservative does it, but not when you do it, Zappacrite?

Your points have nothing to do with this particular thread, so they are merely another standard diversion tossed into the mix whenever one of you Trumpkins finds your losing the debate.
 
Your points have nothing to do with this particular thread, so they are merely another standard diversion tossed into the mix whenever one of you Trumpkins finds your losing the debate.

My point is that Grassley didn't say what Floriduh fan claims he said. He didn't, and I proved it by posting the verbatim quote.

Why are you such a coward, Zappacrite?

Whenever I ask you to answer these questions, you drop a lame excuse and take off.

Is Russell Walker a "Trumpkin", as you claimed on August 24th and have avoided proving ever since, Zappacrite?

Is it OK for Christiecrite and other so-called "progressives" to use threadbans without a word of rebuke from you, Zappacrite?

Do you think that starting multiple insult threads is infantile when a conservative does it, but not when you do it, Zappacrite?

Uter-Zorker-do-not-make-me-run-I-am-full-of-chocolate.gif
 
Back
Top