GOP torn as Greene speaks to far right amid ‘Putin!’ chants

[Guno צְבִי]

Republican leaders in Congress are torn over what to do with Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene after the congresswoman spoke at a weekend event organized by a white nationalist who marveled over Russia’s invasion of Ukraine as the crowd erupted in chants of “Putin!”

House Republican leader Kevin McCarthy called the congresswoman’s speech on the same stage “unacceptable.” Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell said “there’s no place in the Republican Party for white supremacists.”

The congresswoman was welcomed to the stage after Fuentes led the crowd of mostly white men into a rousing embrace of Russia, marveling at its show of strength invading Ukraine.

“Can we get a round of applause for Russia?” he asked. The crowd chanted “Putin! Putin!”

https://apnews.com/article/russia-u...ch-mcconnell-6dd6985db085537fcb103c0d022ac775

 

[Truck Fump / h1b]

Republican leaders in Congress are torn over what to do with Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene after the congresswoman spoke at a weekend event organized by a white nationalist who marveled over Russia’s invasion of Ukraine as the crowd erupted in chants of “Putin!”

House Republican leader Kevin McCarthy called the congresswoman’s speech on the same stage “unacceptable.” Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell said “there’s no place in the Republican Party for white supremacists.”

The congresswoman was welcomed to the stage after Fuentes led the crowd of mostly white men into a rousing embrace of Russia, marveling at its show of strength invading Ukraine.

“Can we get a round of applause for Russia?” he asked. The crowd chanted “Putin! Putin!”

https://apnews.com/article/russia-u...ch-mcconnell-6dd6985db085537fcb103c0d022ac775

fake news.

 

[Guno צְבִי]

 

[PoliTalker]

Hello guno,

Republican leaders in Congress are torn over what to do with Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene after the congresswoman spoke at a weekend event organized by a white nationalist who marveled over Russia’s invasion of Ukraine as the crowd erupted in chants of “Putin!”

House Republican leader Kevin McCarthy called the congresswoman’s speech on the same stage “unacceptable.” Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell said “there’s no place in the Republican Party for white supremacists.”

The congresswoman was welcomed to the stage after Fuentes led the crowd of mostly white men into a rousing embrace of Russia, marveling at its show of strength invading Ukraine.

“Can we get a round of applause for Russia?” he asked. The crowd chanted “Putin! Putin!”

https://apnews.com/article/russia-u...ch-mcconnell-6dd6985db085537fcb103c0d022ac775

"Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell said “there’s no place in the Republican Party for white supremacists.”"

McConnell is unfortunately wrong. The Republican Party he envisions has no place for racists, but sadly that is not the actual Republican Party of today. The Republican Party can't win elections without the racist vote. The Republican Party owes it's power to racism.

Greene is an extremist. Greene is a racist.

I like this part of the article:

"Asked if Greene or the others should be kicked out of the GOP, Sen. Mitt Romney of Utah, once the party’s presidential nominee, said: “They should be laughed out.”"

 

[Walt]

fake news.

Something happened that hurts your case, so you pretend it did not happen. That makes for weak arguments.

 

[Truck Fump / h1b]

Something happened that hurts your case, so you pretend it did not happen. That makes for weak arguments.

Like indictments of hillary's team for lying and targetting a sitting president unlawfully with the power of government?

 

[Phantasmal]

I know what Democrats would do…Marjory would be gone.

 

[Cypress]

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene spoke at a weekend event organized by a white nationalist who marveled over Russia’s invasion of Ukraine as the crowd erupted in chants of “Putin!”

Personally, I have never been mystified why American conservatives are enthralled with Vladimir Putin. He hates democracy, he hates liberalism, he is homophobic, socially conservative, believes in absolute heirarchy, and he postures as traditionally and devoutly religious.

 

[Walt]

Like indictments of hillary's team for lying and targetting a sitting president unlawfully with the power of government?

You see, there you go putting out falsehoods. The truth is not great for Clinton, but nowhere near as bad as you claim. The closest thing to an indictment of anyone associated with Clinton's team is one indictment (not plural) of Michael Sussmann. Sussmann had worked for the DNC (not Clinton, but close enough), but was not working for anyone when he talked to FBI general counsel James Baker(same name, but not the former Secretary of State). According to Sussmann, he disclosed his past employment, and said he was working for no one at the time. According to Durham, he was still working for the DNC, though not for money, and not following orders(so not working).

Another important fact is that the conversation in question happened in September of 2016, so trump was not the sitting president. It was before the election, so not even the president elect. Clinton has almost entirely retired from politics, so has done little to nothing against trump as president. She has written a few books, but if trump is too weak to survive a negative book, then we are well rid of him.

Sussmann is demanding a quicker trial, which usually means he has a good case. And the "lies" all seem to be factually correct, which usually means not lies. Sussmann was not working for the DNC at the time of the conversation, though he had as stated to the FBI worked for the DNC before.

If there are other indictments of people connected to Clinton, feel free to mention them.

 

[Truck Fump / h1b]

You see, there you go putting out falsehoods. The truth is not great for Clinton, but nowhere near as bad as you claim. The closest thing to an indictment of anyone associated with Clinton's team is one indictment (not plural) of Michael Sussmann. Sussmann had worked for the DNC (not Clinton, but close enough), but was not working for anyone when he talked to FBI general counsel James Baker(same name, but not the former Secretary of State). According to Sussmann, he disclosed his past employment, and said he was working for no one at the time. According to Durham, he was still working for the DNC, though not for money, and not following orders(so not working).

Another important fact is that the conversation in question happened in September of 2016, so trump was not the sitting president. It was before the election, so not even the president elect. Clinton has almost entirely retired from politics, so has done little to nothing against trump as president. She has written a few books, but if trump is too weak to survive a negative book, then we are well rid of him.

Sussmann is demanding a quicker trial, which usually means he has a good case. And the "lies" all seem to be factually correct, which usually means not lies. Sussmann was not working for the DNC at the time of the conversation, though he had as stated to the FBI worked for the DNC before.

If there are other indictments of people connected to Clinton, feel free to mention them.

Like i said, You're brainwashed.

clintonistas used the power of government to go after a sitting president.

it's not one converstion. it's a war of lies that's still going on. as you have proven with your dumbousity.

 

[ThatOwlWoman]

Like i said, You're brainwashed.

clintonistas used the power of government to go after a sitting president.

it's not one converstion. it's a war of lies that's still going on. as you have proven with your dumbousity.

So your claim is that Clinton used the power of government (meaning she was a government official at the time) to go after a sitting president. That would be Obama, of course, who was president until January of 2017. The moment Obama was no longer president, Clinton's official "power" ended as well. So in what way did she "go after" Barack Obama?

Talk about not being able to keep your story straight.

 

[Truck Fump / h1b]

So your claim is that Clinton used the power of government (meaning she was a government official at the time) to go after a sitting president. That would be Obama, of course, who was president until January of 2017. The moment Obama was no longer president, Clinton's official "power" ended as well. So in what way did she "go after" Barack Obama?

Talk about not being able to keep your story straight.

no she was not in government at the time, but she was directing those who were. fbi and cia, others.

Look how stupid your made up logic is.

 

[Walt]

clintonistas used the power of government to go after a sitting president.

You claim that has happened, and there are "indictments"(plural), but cannot name who has been indicted?

To the best of my knowledge, Durham has indicted no one for anything happening after January 20th, 2017. Can you name an indictment for actions after January 20th, 2017?

 

[Walt]

no she was not in government at the time, but she was directing those who were. fbi and cia, others.

Doesn't it seem more likely that starting on January 20th, 2017, trump was directing the FBI and CIA? I am just saying, maybe Clinton really has retired, walking her dog, playing with her grandchildren, and writing a book every now and then. The same people who told us that was all an act, also told us that she would run for President in 2020... Which she did not.

 

[Truck Fump / h1b]

Doesn't it seem more likely that starting on January 20th, 2017, trump was directing the FBI and CIA? I am just saying, maybe Clinton really has retired, walking her dog, playing with her grandchildren, and writing a book every now and then. The same people who told us that was all an act, also told us that she would run for President in 2020... Which she did not.

they hated trump.

and they used their positions against him, illegally.

you're right. treason is involved. good point.

 

[Truck Fump / h1b]

You claim that has happened, and there are "indictments"(plural), but cannot name who has been indicted?

To the best of my knowledge, Durham has indicted no one for anything happening after January 20th, 2017. Can you name an indictment for actions after January 20th, 2017?

research john durham findings.

if you care.

 

[Stringfellow Hawk]

I know what Democrats would do…Marjory would be gone.

sure they would, Biden is supporting the Russia war machine, Pelosi is profiting from insider trading, Harris, Pelosi, and Schumer all supported the riots and assaults in 21'. All are still here serving

 

[Walt]

research john durham findings.

if you care.

I have, and cannot find anything to backup your claims. You say these indictments(plural) are public, so you should be able to easily name indictments by Durham for anything happening after January 20th, 2017.... And I keep waiting for you to list the names.

 

[Truck Fump / h1b]

I have, and cannot find anything to backup your claims. You say these indictments(plural) are public, so you should be able to easily name indictments by Durham for anything happening after January 20th, 2017.... And I keep waiting for you to list the names.

You're dishonest.

im addressing others right now.