SmarterthanYou
rebel
why not? wouldn't it be similar to asking a florist how to do a tracheotomy?While there is emotion involved, I don't think that's a great way to characterize the resulting conclusions.
why not? wouldn't it be similar to asking a florist how to do a tracheotomy?While there is emotion involved, I don't think that's a great way to characterize the resulting conclusions.
there's no effective way to garner that information, simply because most of them are not recorded.do you have any information regarding people stopping crimes and people abusing their gun rights
Sounds a lot like "Tombstone" to me.
The worst year for murders in Tombstone between 1870 and 1885 was 1881. That year there were 5 murders. "Tombstone" sounds better than most places.
I get the argument that certain situations might be safer if people carried guns everywhere.
However, the flip side of that is that people would be carrying guns everywhere - people who have road rage, anger issues, are prone to physical altercations, etc. I think that's why most people don't like the idea of people carrying guns everywhere.
Because I've seen the movie quite a few times.
You mean like George Zimmerman?
The worst year for murders in Tombstone between 1870 and 1885 was 1881. That year there were 5 murders. "Tombstone" sounds better than most places.
Uh huh. What did you carry in Vietnam again? Care to place those fists against, say myself? A far younger, and most likely better built (determined on the basis of age) individual?