Hegseth issues an illegal order.

Sounds like some senators knew some classified information when they felt it was important to remind the military that they have a obligation to refuse illegal orders.

This is about to explode. Keep trying to ignore it.
It appears that the Inspector General, who would have warned Haig Seth that his order was Illegal, was fired the week after the Incident
 
Question, why did they follow an illegal order? Didn't they here what Mark Kelly said about refusing an illegal order?!!

Article 92 and Obeying Orders

Under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), Article 92, service members must obey lawful orders. Failure to obey a lawful order can lead to serious punishment, including court-martial.

But there is a key qualifier: the order must be
lawful. If an order is manifestly illegal, service members not only may refuse it — they have a duty to do so. Obeying an illegal order can expose a service member to criminal liability.

When Is an Order “Manifestly Illegal”?

Not every questionable order counts. Courts have held that for an order to be manifestly illegal, its unlawfulness must be clear and obvious. Classic examples include:

  • Orders to target civilians.
  • Orders to falsify official documents.
  • Orders to commit crimes such as theft or assault.
Most operational or deployment orders, even if later challenged in court, are not “obviously” illegal in the moment.

https://www.ucmjlaw.com/article-92-can-service-members-refuse-an-illegal-order/
 
Question, why did they follow an illegal order? Didn't they here what Mark Kelly said about refusing an illegal order?!!

Article 92 and Obeying Orders

Under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), Article 92, service members must obey lawful orders. Failure to obey a lawful order can lead to serious punishment, including court-martial.

But there is a key qualifier: the order must be
lawful. If an order is manifestly illegal, service members not only may refuse it — they have a duty to do so. Obeying an illegal order can expose a service member to criminal liability.

When Is an Order “Manifestly Illegal”?

Not every questionable order counts. Courts have held that for an order to be manifestly illegal, its unlawfulness must be clear and obvious. Classic examples include:

  • Orders to target civilians.
  • Orders to falsify official documents.
  • Orders to commit crimes such as theft or assault.
Most operational or deployment orders, even if later challenged in court, are not “obviously” illegal in the moment.

https://www.ucmjlaw.com/
It seems they did it before the reminder, and likely because they wanted to keep their jobs. They thought it would never come out.
 
Question, why did they follow an illegal order? Didn't they here what Mark Kelly said about refusing an illegal order?!!

Article 92 and Obeying Orders

Under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), Article 92, service members must obey lawful orders. Failure to obey a lawful order can lead to serious punishment, including court-martial.

But there is a key qualifier: the order must be
lawful. If an order is manifestly illegal, service members not only may refuse it — they have a duty to do so. Obeying an illegal order can expose a service member to criminal liability.

When Is an Order “Manifestly Illegal”?

Not every questionable order counts. Courts have held that for an order to be manifestly illegal, its unlawfulness must be clear and obvious. Classic examples include:

  • Orders to target civilians.
  • Orders to falsify official documents.
  • Orders to commit crimes such as theft or assault.
Most operational or deployment orders, even if later challenged in court, are not “obviously” illegal in the moment.

https://www.ucmjlaw.com/article-92-can-service-members-refuse-an-illegal-order/
Fuck you asshole. You supported the assassination of your president so, fuck you!
 
It seems they did it before the reminder, and likely because they wanted to keep their jobs. They thought it would never come out.

Looks like someone needs a refresher on the law.

Sounds like some senators knew some classified information when they felt it was important to remind the military that they have a obligation to refuse illegal orders.

This is about to explode. Keep trying to ignore it.

It appears that the Inspector General, who would have warned Haig Seth that his order was Illegal, was fired the week after the Incident

No Cyber Monday deals on extended warranties?
 
It’s now become a bipartisan issue.

“Republican Senator Roger Wicker of Mississippi, who chairs the Senate Armed Services Committee, and Rhode Island Senator Jack Reed, the top Democrat on the committee, jointly called on Friday for "vigorous oversight" and said the committee would "determine the facts related to these circumstances."

Republican Representative Mike Rogers, who leads the House Armed Services Committee, pledged in a statement issued alongside the committee's top Democrat, Representative Adam Smith, to carry out "rigorous oversight of the Department of Defense’s military operations in the Caribbean."

 
It seems they did it before the reminder, and likely because they wanted to keep their jobs. They thought it would never come out.
I don't want see our military or part of it become a modern day Waffen-SS, was the combat branch of the Nazi Party's paramilitary organization, the Schutzstaffel (SS), during World War II. It was involved in military operations and numerous war crimes, including participation in the Holocaust.
 
Sounds like some senators knew some classified information when they felt it was important to remind the military that they have a obligation to refuse illegal orders.

This is about to explode. Keep trying to ignore it.
There you go with the stupid lies again. I don't think you can post without lying and looking like a gullible dimwit.
 
It appears that the Inspector General, who would have warned Haig Seth that his order was Illegal, was fired the week after the Incident
So, this is IT!!!

haha.gif
 
Question, why did they follow an illegal order? Didn't they here what Mark Kelly said about refusing an illegal order?!!

Article 92 and Obeying Orders

Under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), Article 92, service members must obey lawful orders. Failure to obey a lawful order can lead to serious punishment, including court-martial.

But there is a key qualifier: the order must be
lawful. If an order is manifestly illegal, service members not only may refuse it — they have a duty to do so. Obeying an illegal order can expose a service member to criminal liability.

When Is an Order “Manifestly Illegal”?

Not every questionable order counts. Courts have held that for an order to be manifestly illegal, its unlawfulness must be clear and obvious. Classic examples include:

  • Orders to target civilians.
  • Orders to falsify official documents.
  • Orders to commit crimes such as theft or assault.
Most operational or deployment orders, even if later challenged in court, are not “obviously” illegal in the moment.

https://www.ucmjlaw.com/article-92-can-service-members-refuse-an-illegal-order/
MORON ALERT!!! :lolup:
 
Back
Top