High School Maniacal

christiefan915

Catalyst
And people think women are catty. Christie's a special kind of clueless idiot that he has to dredge up high school drama to justify throwing Wildstein under the bus, and get distance from his own sleazy actions.

WASHINGTON — High school never ends. Chris Christie has given us proof of that, as though we needed it. Still, anyone who clings to high school the way the 51-year-old governor of New Jersey does makes me nervous.

In his hilariously lame attempt to demonize his old schoolmate and handpicked point man at the Port Authority, David Wildstein, by dredging up stuff Wildstein did as a teenager 35 years ago at Livingston High, Christie has confirmed the biographical, metaphysical and psychological primacy of high school.

On Saturday, Politico published some leaked talking points from Christie’s office with these nyah-nyah complaints about Wildstein: “As a 16-year-old kid, he sued over a local school board election.” And, “He was publicly accused by his high school social studies teacher of deceptive behavior.”

As Shawn Boburg of The Record of Bergen County has reported, Wildstein unsuccessfully sued at 16 to get on the ballot for the county Republican committee and then ran for the local school board at 17, even though he was below the legal age requirement. His social studies teacher charged Wildstein with tricking him into signing an endorsement letter for that race.

Wait, this is supposed to be good for Christie? That he gave a $150,000-a-year job to a guy he knew was a wayward, duplicitous teen?

The Washington Post reported this week that Christie wasn’t always so scornful of silly adolescent litigation. When Christie was a senior, he and his family considered suing to stop a transfer student from co-opting his role as catcher — even if it meant that the team, which went on to win the state championship, would have to forfeit the spring season. But he thought better of it...

It’s risible but sort of alarming that, decades later, Christie is boasting that he was more of a big shot than Wildstein in high school, putting down the guy he created a job for, and going out of his way to say they were not even friends back when they were both connected to the Livingston Lancers — Christie as an ebullient, trim catcher; Wildstein as a quiet, bespectacled statistician...

“Well, let me just clear something up, O.K., about my childhood friend David Wildstein,” Christie said at his marathon press conference in January, a month after Wildstein had fallen on his sword for the governor. “It is true that I met David in 1977 in high school. He’s a year older than me. David and I were not friends in high school. We were not even acquaintances in high school.”

Bristling with narcissism and punitive aggression, he drove his point home: “We didn’t travel in the same circles in high school. You know, I was the class president and athlete. I don’t know what David was doing during that period of time...”

(Continued)

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/02/05/opinion/dowd-high-school-maniacal.html?ref=maureendowd&_r=0
 
1) I don't think anyone here thinks Christi will get elected in 2016.

2) They say New Jersey is all about bare knuckle bloody politics so this type of behavior is not only not uncommon it's par for the course. Just one reason I think Jersey should be kicked out of the Union but that's just my opinion.

3) Vindictiveness in politics is pretty much common everywhere (Jersey takes it to another level).
 
And people think women are catty. Christie's a special kind of clueless idiot that he has to dredge up high school drama to justify throwing Wildstein under the bus, and get distance from his own sleazy actions.

WASHINGTON — High school never ends. Chris Christie has given us proof of that, as though we needed it. Still, anyone who clings to high school the way the 51-year-old governor of New Jersey does makes me nervous.

In his hilariously lame attempt to demonize his old schoolmate and handpicked point man at the Port Authority, David Wildstein, by dredging up stuff Wildstein did as a teenager 35 years ago at Livingston High, Christie has confirmed the biographical, metaphysical and psychological primacy of high school.

On Saturday, Politico published some leaked talking points from Christie’s office with these nyah-nyah complaints about Wildstein: “As a 16-year-old kid, he sued over a local school board election.” And, “He was publicly accused by his high school social studies teacher of deceptive behavior.”

As Shawn Boburg of The Record of Bergen County has reported, Wildstein unsuccessfully sued at 16 to get on the ballot for the county Republican committee and then ran for the local school board at 17, even though he was below the legal age requirement. His social studies teacher charged Wildstein with tricking him into signing an endorsement letter for that race.

Wait, this is supposed to be good for Christie? That he gave a $150,000-a-year job to a guy he knew was a wayward, duplicitous teen?

The Washington Post reported this week that Christie wasn’t always so scornful of silly adolescent litigation. When Christie was a senior, he and his family considered suing to stop a transfer student from co-opting his role as catcher — even if it meant that the team, which went on to win the state championship, would have to forfeit the spring season. But he thought better of it...

It’s risible but sort of alarming that, decades later, Christie is boasting that he was more of a big shot than Wildstein in high school, putting down the guy he created a job for, and going out of his way to say they were not even friends back when they were both connected to the Livingston Lancers — Christie as an ebullient, trim catcher; Wildstein as a quiet, bespectacled statistician...
The
“Well, let me just clear something up, O.K., about my childhood friend David Wildstein,” Christie said at his marathon press conference in January, a month after Wildstein had fallen on his sword for the governor. “It is true that I met David in 1977 in high school. He’s a year older than me. David and I were not friends in high school. We were not even acquaintances in high school.”

Bristling with narcissism and punitive aggression, he drove his point home: “We didn’t travel in the same circles in high school. You know, I was the class president and athlete. I don’t know what David was doing during that period of time...”

(Continued)

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/02/05/opinion/dowd-high-school-maniacal.html?ref=maureendowd&_r=0


The question begs to be asked, if this guy was such a hot mess, why did Christie hire him, create a position for him and praise him till he rolled over on Christie?

It makes no sense and once, again, makes Christie look bad.
 
1) I don't think anyone here thinks Christi will get elected in 2016.

2) They say New Jersey is all about bare knuckle bloody politics so this type of behavior is not only not uncommon it's par for the course. Just one reason I think Jersey should be kicked out of the Union but that's just my opinion.

3) Vindictiveness in politics is pretty much common everywhere (Jersey takes it to another level).

Vindictiveness may be common but I haven't heard it applied to any other presidential wannabes except Christie. The last prez I heard it applied to was Nixon.
 
It's NJ. The only way Christie would have a more difficult time appointing people who haven't displayed deceptive behaviour is if he became mayor of Chicago.
 
I dunno, would he be droning weddings that he wasn't invited to?

No, that would be business as usual for American war hawks. But you raise an interesting question, a number of people here (not you) have commented that they'd like to see all Muslims eliminated from the face of the earth, yet they complain bitterly about drones. So what is it, eliminate drones or eliminate Muslims?
 
No, that would be business as usual for American war hawks. But you raise an interesting question, a number of people here (not you) have commented that they'd like to see all Muslims eliminated from the face of the earth, yet they complain bitterly about drones. So what is it, eliminate drones or eliminate Muslims?

Por que no los dos?

They're not mutually exclusive.
 
Back
Top