Hillary injects much needed enthusiasm for democrats

To get around the pay wall, add the site to the list of sites that cannot use javascript. I read WSJ articles, I do not pay.

You can get it read it to you easy enough for free. :D

I'm not running noscript right now, got tired of having to allow things.

There's a lot of roadblocks/speedbumps on the internet these days.
 
Rightys hate Hillary. She is smart, speaks clearly and well, and defends her position as an adult. That is like speaking a foreign language to rightys. They like Daffy Donald who throws words into a blender and they come out as comedy gold. He was an embarrassment in office.
 
Rightys hate Hillary. She is smart, speaks clearly and well, and defends her position as an adult. That is like speaking a foreign language to rightys. They like Daffy Donald who throws words into a blender and they come out as comedy gold. He was an embarrassment in office.

She's also, thoroughly corrupt, mendacious, narcissistic, vindictive, and unethical. The first indication of this is she got tossed off the Watergate investigation as a young lawyer for trying to keep Nixon from getting council and hiding exculpatory evidence. In firing her she was characterized as "unethical" and "dishonest." Ever since, she's been the exact same way.

She isn't an embarrassment to whatever office she's held, but rather a corrupting and staining influence on it.
 
She's also, thoroughly corrupt, mendacious, narcissistic, vindictive, and unethical. The first indication of this is she got tossed off the Watergate investigation as a young lawyer for trying to keep Nixon from getting council and hiding exculpatory evidence. In firing her she was characterized as "unethical" and "dishonest." Ever since, she's been the exact same way.

She isn't an embarrassment to whatever office she's held, but rather a corrupting and staining influence on it.

You Trump fascists have no moral authority to criticize anyone.
 
She's also, thoroughly corrupt, mendacious, narcissistic, vindictive, and unethical. The first indication of this is she got tossed off the Watergate investigation as a young lawyer for trying to keep Nixon from getting council and hiding exculpatory evidence. In firing her she was characterized as "unethical" and "dishonest." Ever since, she's been the exact same way.

She isn't an embarrassment to whatever office she's held, but rather a corrupting and staining influence on it.

About a dozen investigations into Hillary and she was found guilty of zero crimes. If the rightys could have got her for jaywalking they would have had a national trial. What the Reds accomplished was proving beyond a doubt that she is an honest person. She did not go to court fighting subpoenas. She showed up and testified UNDER OATH. She took them on defying them to prove she committed a crime. They could not. That is how an honest person who knows they have done nothing wrong would react.
It is the opposite of what Trump has done. Trump ignores subpoenas. Fights and delays in court. He covers up and hides.
Can you figure out which one is crooked? I doubt it. It has eluded you so far.
 
Back
Top