His Assassin "debating" with him just weeks before he killed him...

Charlie Kirk refused Netanyahu funding offer, was ‘frightened’ by pro-Israel forces before death, friend reveals
by Max Blumenthal and Anya Parampil·September 12, 2025

In the weeks leading up to his September 10 assassination, Kirk had come to loathe the Israeli leader, regarding him as a “bully,” the source said. Kirk was disgusted by what he witnessed inside the Trump administration, where Netanyahu sought to personally dictate the president’s personnel decisions, and weaponized Israeli assets like billionaire donor Miriam Adelson to keep the White House firmly under its thumb.

According to Kirk’s friend, who also enjoyed access to President Donald Trump and his inner circle, Kirk strongly warned Trump last June against bombing Iran on Israel’s behalf. “Charlie was the only person who did that,” they said, recalling how Trump “barked at him” in response and angrily shut down the conversation. The source believes the incident confirmed in Kirk’s mind that the president of the United States had fallen under the control of a malign foreign power, and was leading his own country into a series of disastrous conflicts.

By the following month, Kirk had become the target of a sustained private campaign of intimidation and free-floating fury by wealthy and powerful allies of Netanyahu – figures he described in an interview as Jewish “leaders” and “stakeholders.”

https://thegrayzone.com/2025/09/12/charlie-kirk-netanyahu-israel-assassination/
 
I get it. It's just the reality of social media now. There are so many made-up tweets and videos like this. It’s natural for people to believe what’s posted, but the way things are today almost requires us to fact-check first for credibility.
A good reason why more Critical Thinking should be taught in schools.

32q238.jpg
 
A good reason why more Critical Thinking should be taught in schools.

32q238.jpg
The one thing missing from that skills list is a willingness to look at all the data when evaluating or analyzing. So many people claim to have critical thinking skills because they follow most of those but in reality they only use the facts and data that fits their bias.
 
The one thing missing from that skills list is a willingness to look at all the data when evaluating or analyzing. So many people claim to have critical thinking skills because they follow most of those but in reality they only use the facts and data that fits their bias.
It's a course that takes more than a meme to get across. I never took a direct "critical thinking course" but my professional training demanded that the skills be employed in order to be successful.




View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5cDl0I3zusk
 
Last edited:
The one thing missing from that skills list is a willingness to look at all the data when evaluating or analyzing. So many people claim to have critical thinking skills because they follow most of those but in reality they only use the facts and data that fits their bias.
I don’t know if you’re a sports fan, but on Twitter there are tons of official-sounding accounts like “Big Ten Reporters” that pump out false info. People see that, post it on boards, and others assume the link was vetted when it really wasn’t.

And when the headline (regardless of topic) fits our biases, our desire to look deeper goes way down.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TOP
I don’t know if you’re a sports fan, but on Twitter there are tons of official-sounding accounts like “Big Ten Reporters” that pump out false info. People see that, post it on boards, and others assume the link was vetted when it really wasn’t.

And when the headline (regardless of topic) fits our biases, our desire to look deeper goes way down.
Yep. That is simple human nature. But don't claim you are using critical thinking skills if you aren't at least attempting to rise above your base nature.
 
Back
Top