Hogwash, Mr. President

Canceled2

Banned
Robert Scheer

What is the state of the union? You certainly couldn't tell from that platitudinous hogwash that the president dished out Tuesday evening. I had expected Barack Obama to be his eloquent self, appealing to our better nature, but instead he was mealy-mouthed in avoiding the tough choices that a leader should delineate in a time of trouble. He embraced clean air and a faster Internet while ignoring the depth of our economic pain and the Wall Street scoundrels who were responsible -- understandably so, since they so prominently populate the highest reaches of his administration.

He had the effrontery to condemn "a parade of lobbyists" for rigging government after he appointed the top Washington representative of JPMorgan Chase to be his new chief of staff.

The speech was a distraction from what seriously ails us: an unabated mortgage crisis, stubbornly high unemployment and a debt that spiraled out of control while the government wasted trillions making the bankers whole. Instead the president conveyed the insular optimism of his fat-cat associates: "We are poised for progress. Two years after the worst recession most of us have ever known, the stock market has come roaring back. Corporate profits are up. The economy is growing again." How convenient to ignore the fact that this bubble of prosperity, which has failed the tens of millions losing their homes and jobs, was floated by enormous government indebtedness now forcing deep cuts in social services including state financial aid for those better-educated students the president claims to be so concerned about.


His references to education provided a convenient scapegoat for the failure of the economy, rather than to blame the actions of the Wall Street hustlers to whom Obama is now sucking up. Yes, it is an obvious good to have better-educated students to compete with other economies, but that is hardly the issue of the moment when all of the world's economies are suffering grievous harm resulting from the irresponsible behavior of the best and the brightest here at home. It wasn't the students struggling at community colleges who came up with the financial gimmicks that produced the Great Recession, but rather the super-whiz-kid graduates of the top business and law schools.


What nonsense to insist that low public school test scores hobbled our economy when it was the highest-achieving graduates of our elite colleges who designed and sold the financial gimmicks that created this crisis. Indeed, some of the folks who once designed the phony mathematical formulas underwriting subprime mortgage-based derivatives won Nobel prizes for their effort. A pioneer in the securitization of mortgage debt, as well as exporting jobs abroad, was one Jeffrey Immelt, the CEO of GE, whom Obama recently appointed to head his new job creation panel.

The rest here
 
From HuffPost...

Issa Blocks Cummings From Making Case Against JPMorgan At Start Of Foreclosure Hearing

WASHINGTON - House Oversight Chairman Darrell Issa's investigation into the foreclosure crisis is off to a rough start. On Wednesday, the ranking Democrat on the oversight panel, Elijah Cummings (Md.), planned to use his opening statement to charge Issa with blocking the summoning of a witness from JPMorgan Chase to explain the bank's role in alleged foreclosure fraud.

More
 
From HuffPost...

Issa Blocks Cummings From Making Case Against JPMorgan At Start Of Foreclosure Hearing

WASHINGTON - House Oversight Chairman Darrell Issa's investigation into the foreclosure crisis is off to a rough start. On Wednesday, the ranking Democrat on the oversight panel, Elijah Cummings (Md.), planned to use his opening statement to charge Issa with blocking the summoning of a witness from JPMorgan Chase to explain the bank's role in alleged foreclosure fraud.

More

so you're deflecting from the OP, avoiding talking about the actual subject, but bitching when others purportedly do this to you

hello hypocrite!!!!
 
and you whine about attacking the source....so...do you have anything to say about the OP or is this more of your hypocrisy?

I'm not enthused with Obama. But the problem is Republicans are much worse. They believe Wall Street and corporations SHOULD run our government.
 
Scheer is a non partisan- he is an anti Wall Street guy who now thinks Obama is just carrying on the well worn tradition of being cozy to money interests. I am relating this hoping that it helps bfgrn get over his whine :)
 
I'm not enthused with Obama. But the problem is Republicans are much worse. They believe Wall Street and corporations SHOULD run our government.

really....could you link me or give me some evidence to support your assertion, because i believe your assertion is full of meadowmuffins
 
Scheer is a non partisan- he is an anti Wall Street guy who now thinks Obama is just carrying on the well worn tradition of being cozy to money interests. I am relating this hoping that it helps bfgrn get over his whine :)

wait Robert Scheer is non-partisan? Is this the same Robert Scheer who has been writing for years?
 
really....could you link me or give me some evidence to support your assertion, because i believe your assertion is full of meadowmuffins

So what are you saying Yurt, the GOP is the anti-Wall Street, anti-corporation party? Do you live on EARTH, or some other planet?


Unified GOP To Block Senate From Debating Wall Street Reform


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/04/16/unified-gop-to-block-sena_n_540823.html

Rep. Barton apologizes to BP for Obama 'shakedown'

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ynews/ynews_ts2660
 
wait Robert Scheer is non-partisan? Is this the same Robert Scheer who has been writing for years?

He's a liberal-no doubt. His reporting however stems from a more then normal willingness, as liberal's go, to present facts.

for instance there is this tid-bit to his political resume'

In the October 1, 2010, episode of the radio show "Left, Right and Center", Scheer, a self-described Liberal, expressed support for Rand Paul, son of former Libertarian presidential candidate Ron Paul, in his bid for the 2011-2016 Kentucky Senate seat
 
UOTE=Bfgrn;765205]So what are you saying Yurt, the GOP is the anti-Wall Street, anti-corporation party? Do you live on EARTH, or some other planet?

no, i don't believe that. nor do i believe many dems are anti wallstreet or anti corporation. i merely challenge your assertion

But the problem is Republicans are much worse. They believe Wall Street and corporations SHOULD run our government

you claim they want wallstreet and corps to RUN our government....you have nothing and the below is nothing, you are a walking talking hack

[
SIZE="5"]
Unified GOP To Block Senate From Debating Wall Street Reform[/SIZE]

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/04/16/unified-gop-to-block-sena_n_540823.html

Rep. Barton apologizes to BP for Obama 'shakedown'

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ynews/ynews_ts2660


yeah...doesn't even come within a billion miles of supporting your claim

care to try again?
 
I'm not enthused with Obama. But the problem is Republicans are much worse. They believe Wall Street and corporations SHOULD run our government.
This is BULLSHIT! Both parties are complicit in this. Both parties are beholden to Wall Street and Lobbiests. I am tired of the partisan blame shifting when both parties are to blame. I am also tired of the Kool Aid drinkers from both parties pretending that their side has the common person's well being at heart. If that were true, they would re-write the tax code, they would not FORCE people to buy insurance from private insurers without addressing things that keep the cost of medical care high, including extortionist level malpractice insurance premiums and unabated medmal lawsuits regardless of merit. The whole group of them are out for one group, congress. Already supporters of the Teaparty are writing apologies for why the Teaparty backed congresscritters are already suckling up to the teet of special interest so that they can raise money for re-election in two years. A pox on both their houses.
 
no, i don't believe that. nor do i believe many dems are anti wallstreet or anti corporation. i merely challenge your assertion



you claim they want wallstreet and corps to RUN our government....you have nothing and the below is nothing, you are a walking talking hack

[


yeah...doesn't even come within a billion miles of supporting your claim

care to try again?

Anyone as stupid as you is beyond help. I am sure there is no Republican who would admit they believe Wall Street and corporations should run our government. It just takes awareness and living on the planet earth for that to be apparent. Issues like regulations and watch dog agencies that Republicans want to eliminate or neuter gives normal people a clue. Regulatory capture ran rampant while Republicans were in charge...

Cheney’s Culture of Deregulation and Corruption
How Bush Administration Inaction Created the BP Disaster

http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2010/06/cheney_deregulation.html

"Republicans approve of the American farmer, but they are willing to help him go broke. They stand four-square for the American home--but not for housing. They are strong for labor--but they are stronger for restricting labor's rights. They favor minimum wage--the smaller the minimum wage the better. They endorse educational opportunity for all--but they won't spend money for teachers or for schools. They approve of social security benefits-so much so that they took them away from almost a million people. They think modern medical care and hospitals are fine--for people who can afford them. They believe in international trade--so much so that they crippled our reciprocal trade program, and killed our International Wheat Agreement. They favor the admission of displaced persons--but only within shameful racial and religious limitations.They consider electrical power a great blessing--but only when the private power companies get their rake-off. They say TVA is wonderful--but we ought never to try it again. They condemn "cruelly high prices"--but fight to the death every effort to bring them down. They think American standard of living is a fine thing--so long as it doesn't spread to all the people. And they admire of Government of the United States so much that they would like to buy it."

Now, my friends, that is the Wall Street Republican way of life. But there is another way--there is another way--the Democratic way, the way of the Democratic Party.

Of course, the Democratic Party is not perfect. Nobody ever said it was. But the Democratic Party believes in the people. It believes in freedom and progress, and it is fighting for its beliefs right now.

In the Democratic Party, you won't find the kind of unity where everybody thinks what the boss tells him to think, and nothing else.

But you will find an overriding purpose to work for the good of mankind. And you will find a program--a concrete, realistic, and practical program that is worth believing in and fighting for.
President Harry S. Truman - October 13, 1948
 
This is BULLSHIT! Both parties are complicit in this. Both parties are beholden to Wall Street and Lobbiests. I am tired of the partisan blame shifting when both parties are to blame. I am also tired of the Kool Aid drinkers from both parties pretending that their side has the common person's well being at heart. If that were true, they would re-write the tax code, they would not FORCE people to buy insurance from private insurers without addressing things that keep the cost of medical care high, including extortionist level malpractice insurance premiums and unabated medmal lawsuits regardless of merit. The whole group of them are out for one group, congress. Already supporters of the Teaparty are writing apologies for why the Teaparty backed congresscritters are already suckling up to the teet of special interest so that they can raise money for re-election in two years. A pox on both their houses.

Did Oscar Wilde know you personally?

A cynic is a man who knows the price of everything but the value of nothing.
Oscar Wilde
 
Anyone as stupid as you is beyond help. I am sure there is no Republican who would admit they believe Wall Street and corporations should run our government. It just takes awareness and living on the planet earth for that to be apparent. Issues like regulations and watch dog agencies that Republicans want to eliminate or neuter gives normal people a clue. Regulatory capture ran rampant while Republicans were in charge...

Cheney’s Culture of Deregulation and Corruption
How Bush Administration Inaction Created the BP Disaster

http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2010/06/cheney_deregulation.html

"Republicans approve of the American farmer, but they are willing to help him go broke. They stand four-square for the American home--but not for housing. They are strong for labor--but they are stronger for restricting labor's rights. They favor minimum wage--the smaller the minimum wage the better. They endorse educational opportunity for all--but they won't spend money for teachers or for schools. They approve of social security benefits-so much so that they took them away from almost a million people. They think modern medical care and hospitals are fine--for people who can afford them. They believe in international trade--so much so that they crippled our reciprocal trade program, and killed our International Wheat Agreement. They favor the admission of displaced persons--but only within shameful racial and religious limitations.They consider electrical power a great blessing--but only when the private power companies get their rake-off. They say TVA is wonderful--but we ought never to try it again. They condemn "cruelly high prices"--but fight to the death every effort to bring them down. They think American standard of living is a fine thing--so long as it doesn't spread to all the people. And they admire of Government of the United States so much that they would like to buy it."

Now, my friends, that is the Wall Street Republican way of life. But there is another way--there is another way--the Democratic way, the way of the Democratic Party.

Of course, the Democratic Party is not perfect. Nobody ever said it was. But the Democratic Party believes in the people. It believes in freedom and progress, and it is fighting for its beliefs right now.

In the Democratic Party, you won't find the kind of unity where everybody thinks what the boss tells him to think, and nothing else.

But you will find an overriding purpose to work for the good of mankind. And you will find a program--a concrete, realistic, and practical program that is worth believing in and fighting for.
President Harry S. Truman - October 13, 1948

are you insane? are you simple? nothing you provided comes close to supporting your statement:

But the problem is Republicans are much worse. They believe Wall Street and corporations SHOULD run our government

when you have something that shows republicans have said that wallstreet and corps SHOULD run our government, get back me to me....until then you're full of shit

republicans don't want a corp or wallstreet running the government, they would never get elected you ignorant moron, we would have shareholders etc running the country and no pub has ever wanted that.....idiot
 
are you insane? are you simple? nothing you provided comes close to supporting your statement:



when you have something that shows republicans have said that wallstreet and corps SHOULD run our government, get back me to me....until then you're full of shit

republicans don't want a corp or wallstreet running the government, they would never get elected you ignorant moron, we would have shareholders etc running the country and no pub has ever wanted that.....idiot

Really Yurt, what do you think deregulation IS? What party fights FOR deregulation? What party fights AGAINST environmental policies?

How Senator Vitter Battled the EPA Over Formaldehyde’s Link to Cancer

vitter-fema-trailer-475px.jpg

Sen. David Vitter, R-La., has pushed the EPA to slow its process of updating its 20-year-old health assessment of formaldehyde. After Hurricane Katrina, thousands of his state's residents said they suffered respiratory problems after being housed in government trailers contaminated with formaldehyde.

When Sen. David Vitter persuaded the EPA to agree to yet another review of its long-delayed assessment of the health risks of formaldehyde, he was praised by companies that use or manufacture a chemical found in everything from plywood to carpet.

As long as the studies continue, the EPA will still list formaldehyde as a "probable" rather than a "known" carcinogen, even though three major scientific reviews now link it to leukemia and have strengthened its ties to other forms of cancer. The chemical industry is fighting to avoid that designation, because it could lead to tighter regulations and require costly pollution controls.

"Delay means money. The longer they can delay labeling something a known carcinogen, the more money they can make," said James Huff, associate director for chemical carcinogenesis at the National Institute for Environmental Health Sciences in the Department of Health and Human Services.

inhofe-275px.jpg

Sen. James Inhofe persuaded the EPA to delay its formaldehyde risk assessment in 2004.

Congress stalled the formaldehyde risk assessment once before. In 2004, Sen. James Inhofe, R-Okla., persuaded [5] (PDF) the EPA to delay it, even though preliminary findings from a National Cancer Institute study had already linked formaldehyde to leukemia. Inhofe insisted that the EPA wait for a more "robust set of findings" from the institute.

Koch Industries, a large chemical manufacturer and one of Inhofe’s biggest campaign contributors [6], gave [7]Inhofe $6,000 that year. That same year Koch bought two pulp mills [8] from Georgia-Pacific, a major formaldehyde producer and one of the world’s largest plywood manufacturers. The next year Koch bought all of Georgia-Pacific.

The "more robust" findings that Inhofe asked for weren’t released until five years later – in May 2009 – and they reinforced [9] the 2004 findings. Of the nearly 25,000 workers the National Cancer Institute had tracked for 30 years, those exposed to higher amounts of formaldehyde had a 37 percent greater risk of death [10] from blood and lymphatic cancers and a 78 percent greater risk of leukemia than those exposed to lower amounts.

http://www.propublica.org/article/how-senator-david-vitter-battled-formaldehyde-link-to-cancer
 
Back
Top