Irish Exit
Verified User
For all you DNC gotcha folks, please explain how this shakes out in your weird little gerbil brains.
How Is Mueller Going to Indict Trump Without Indicting Putin?
- Thread starter Irish Exit
- Start date
Well, he won't be indicting Trump because he can't seem to find a crime to indict him with. Poor snowflakes.
Irish Exit
Verified User
Well, he won't be indicting Trump because he can't seem to find a crime to indict him with. Poor snowflakes.
Don't be raining on the parade. I want to hear tall tales of how President Pelosi kidnaps Putin and brings him to the eastern district of Virginia to stand trial.
You gotta appreciate that even steadfast Trump fan boys instinctively know, at the DNA-level, that the Trump campaign was coordinating, colluding, or cooperating with Russian state security services in unsavory, unethical, and possibly illegal ways.
Why does Mueller have to indict Trump?
Mueller's mandated directive was to determine if there existed any coordination between the Trump campaign and Russian interests, he doesn't have to indict Mueller, all he has to do is prove that coordination did exist, which personally, I think the Trump Tower meeting establishes
Today's inditement of Stone sure seems to indicate that Mueller knows a whole lot more than the "steadfast Trump boys" will ever admit;
"By in or around June and July 2016, STONE informed senior Trump Campaign officials that he had information indicating Organization had documents whose release would be damaging to the Clinton Campaign. The head of Organization 1 was located at all relevant times at the Ecuadorian Embassy in London, United Kingdom."
"After the July 22, 2016 release of stolen DNC emails by Organization 1, a senior Trump Campaign official was directed to contact STONE about any additional releases and what other damaging information Organization 1 had regarding the Clinton Campaign. STONE thereafter told the Trump Campaign about potential future releases of damaging material by Organization 1."
https://www.justice.gov/file/1124706/download
Irish Exit
Verified User
You didn't address the question asked.
Irish Exit
Verified User
I didn't say he had to. I asked how he was going to indict Trump without also indicting Putin. It takes two to tango.
lisasanders1964
Banned
Paul Ryan ADMITTED trump colluded with the Russians but claims that it wouldn't have affected the election result. Orrin Hatch also alleged trump colluded with the Russians but said it was OK cos the president is allowed to do whatever he likes including break the law.
Funny how republiKKKans think a president should be allowed to break the law , but they went apeshit when President Obama wore a frigging tan suit.
Yes folks - wearing a tan suit was a capital offence but colluding with a foreign country to rig a presidential election is perfectly fine......in the republikkkkan world.
Liberals always seem to get lost in their lie filled narratives. Meeting with Russians is not illegal dumb fuck.
What is fascinating is dumb fucks on the left are okay with the Hillary campaign COLLUDING with RUSSIANS and the salacious STEELE dossier on Trump. Morons.
It is now illegal to look for stolen DNC e-mails. Morons on the left and at MSNBC say so.
Irish Exit
Verified User
I see the JPP DNC intelligentsia took the short bus to school today.....nobody willing to directly take on the issue presented by the question. Oh well, off to make some orange marmalade. Maybe later someone with some chops will show up.
Why the hell would a Putin indictment have any connection to Trump? They are indicting Cohen, Manafort, Flynn and many others without indicting Trump. How does that question make sense? Trump's campaign was working with Wikileaks. Does that mean we cannot indict them without indicting Assange? Their deeds may be connected, but their charges are unique to each one of them.
Tranquillus in Exile
New member
Do you have some evidence that the Hillary campaign colluded with agents of the Russian state to obtain the Steele dossier?
If so, tell Trump immediately!
Irish Exit
Verified User
So in other words this has never been about Russia. Gotcha.
Here it is about Russia, dumbfuck. What’s your response? Who do you think suborned perjury with Cohen?
“The information provided by Cohen about the Moscow Project in these proffer sessions is consistent with and corroborated by other information obtained in the course of the [special counsel's] investigation."
“The defendant, without prompting by the SCO, also corrected other false and misleading statements that he had made concerning his outreach to and contacts with Russian officials during the course of the campaign. For example, in a radio interview in September 2015, the defendant suggested that [Trump] meet with the President of Russia in New York City during his visit for the United Nations General Assembly. When asked previously about these events, the defendant claimed his public comments had been spontaneous and had not been discussed within the campaign or the Company. During his proffer sessions, the defendant admitted that this account was false and that he had in fact conferred with Trump about contacting the Russian government before reaching out to gauge Russia’s interest in such a meeting. The meeting ultimately did not take place.”
https://www.cnn.com/2019/01/18/politics/cohen-trump-buzzfeed-court-filings/index.html
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/5453418-Mueller-Cohen-filing.html