How old will Hillary be in January 2017?

B

Big Money

New member
hillary%2Bold.jpg

Remember what ageist liberals said about Reagan?
 
How old was Reagan when he started his second term?

How old would McCain be?

How old would Romney's ties have been?
 
:rofl2:

She is already to old, Bill has not fucked that bush in a long time. That why she is in the bottle so much.

1458273999_drunkhillary_answer_1_xlarge.jpeg
 
Jarod said:
She would be younger than Reagan was.
Click to expand...

Math is not the best asset of morons.

Didn't this moron look up the ages of other presidents before he posted this stupid shit?

Maybe he just couldn't figure out that Reagan was older than Clinton.
 
Reagan was born February 6, 1911, and was 69 years and 349 days old when he was sworn in on January 20, 1981.

http://us-presidents.findthedata.org/app-question/234/Who-was-the-oldest-United-States-President-to-be-inaugurated

The Hildebeast was spawned on October 26, 1947.

How old will she be on Inauguration Day in January 2017?
 
***RacerX*** said:
:rofl2:

She is already to old, Bill has not fucked that bush in a long time. That why she is in the bottle so much.

1458273999_drunkhillary_answer_1_xlarge.jpeg
Click to expand...
There were some distant female relatives who were boozers, so I know a boozer when I see one. The Hillary has all the classic signs of a closet wino. There are those poorer women who love to sip rose jug wine whenever they can, and they have this glow about them. Hillary has all the symptoms of a boozer, butt I bet that she prefers Cabernet Sauvignon or a nice Red Zinfandel or maybe even some Merlot.
 
My favorite writer of all time Camille Paglia thinks Hillary is not qualified. I go with Camille.

As a side note, if there was anyone who could change my core beliefs it is Camille. She is a brilliant writer, engaging, thought provoking and very consistent in her beliefs

She is a liberal's liberal.
 
I Love America said:
My favorite writer of all time Camille Paglia thinks Hillary is not qualified. I go with Camille.

As a side note, if there was anyone who could change my core beliefs it is Camille. She is a brilliant writer, engaging, thought provoking and very consistent in her beliefs

She is a liberal's liberal.
Click to expand...

Radical feminists detest her. I can see why she has some brilliant quotes.

Leaving sex to the feminists is like letting your dog vacation at the taxidermist.

Let's get rid of Infirmary Feminism, with its bedlam of bellyachers, anorexics, bulimics, depressives, rape victims, and incest survivors. Feminism has become a catch-all vegetable drawer where bunches of clingy sob sisters can store their moldy neuroses.

The feminist line is, strippers and topless dancers are degraded, subordinated, and enslaved; they are victims, turned into objects by the display of their anatomy. But women are far from being victims — women rule; they are in total control ... the feminist analysis of prostitution says that men are using money as power over women. I'd say, yes, that's all that men have. The money is a confession of weakness. They have to buy women's attention. It's not a sign of power; it's a sign of weakness.

Men are run ragged by female sexuality all their lives. From the beginning of his life to the end, no man ever fully commands any woman. It's an illusion. Men are pussy-whipped. And they know it. That's what the strip clubs are about; not woman as victim, not woman as slave, but woman as goddess.

Sexuality and eroticism are the intricate intersection of nature and culture. Feminists grossly oversimplify the problem of sex when they reduce it a matter of social convention: readjust society, eliminate sexual inequality, purify sex roles, and happiness and harmony will reign. Here feminism, like all liberal movements of the past two hundred years, is heir to Rousseau.

Society is not the criminal but the force which keeps crime in check. When social controls weaken, man’s innate cruelty bursts forth. The rapist is created not by bad social conditioning influences but by a failure of social conditioning. Feminists, seeking to drive power relations out of sex, have set themselves against nature. In western culture, there are no nonexploitative relationships. Everyone has killed in order to live. Nature’s universal law of creation from destruction operates in mind as in matter. As Freud, Nietzsche’s heir, asserts, identity is conflict. Each generation drives its plow over the bones of the dead.

One of feminism’s irritating reflexes is its fashionable disdain for “patriarchal society,” to which nothing good is ever attributed. But it is patriarchal society that has freed me as a woman. It is capitalism that has given me the leisure to sit at this desk writing this book. Let us stop being small-minded about men and freely acknowledge what treasures their obsessiveness has poured into culture.
 
Last edited:
Aoxomoxoa said:
Radical feminists detest her. I can see why she has some brilliant quotes.

Leaving sex to the feminists is like letting your dog vacation at the taxidermist.

Let's get rid of Infirmary Feminism, with its bedlam of bellyachers, anorexics, bulimics, depressives, rape victims, and incest survivors. Feminism has become a catch-all vegetable drawer where bunches of clingy sob sisters can store their moldy neuroses.

The feminist line is, strippers and topless dancers are degraded, subordinated, and enslaved; they are victims, turned into objects by the display of their anatomy. But women are far from being victims — women rule; they are in total control ... the feminist analysis of prostitution says that men are using money as power over women. I'd say, yes, that's all that men have. The money is a confession of weakness. They have to buy women's attention. It's not a sign of power; it's a sign of weakness.

Men are run ragged by female sexuality all their lives. From the beginning of his life to the end, no man ever fully commands any woman. It's an illusion. Men are pussy-whipped. And they know it. That's what the strip clubs are about; not woman as victim, not woman as slave, but woman as goddess.

Sexuality and eroticism are the intricate intersection of nature and culture. Feminists grossly oversimplify the problem of sex when they reduce it a matter of social convention: readjust society, eliminate sexual inequality, purify sex roles, and happiness and harmony will reign. Here feminism, like all liberal movements of the past two hundred years, is heir to Rousseau.

Society is not the criminal but the force which keeps crime in check. When social controls weaken, man’s innate cruelty bursts forth. The rapist is created not by bad social conditioning influences but by a failure of social conditioning. Feminists, seeking to drive power relations out of sex, have set themselves against nature. In western culture, there are no nonexploitative relationships. Everyone has killed in order to live. Nature’s universal law of creation from destruction operates in mind as in matter. As Freud, Nietzsche’s heir, asserts, identity is conflict. Each generation drives its plow over the bones of the dead.

One of feminism’s irritating reflexes is its fashionable disdain for “patriarchal society,” to which nothing good is ever attributed. But it is patriarchal society that has freed me as a woman. It is capitalism that has given me the leisure to sit at this desk writing this book. Let us stop being small-minded about men and freely acknowledge what treasures their obsessiveness has poured into culture.
Click to expand...


The bolded quote is my favorite and describes some of the female posters here to a T. Camille is brilliant and I can understand why today's radical feminists hate her. She cuts right to the chase. The truth of the matter is that females are in charge. They always have been. But, the feminists have ruined that. It is a shame.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top