How two lovably eccentric dilettantes rescued Nietzsche's reputation and recast him as a prescient postmodern thinker

Hume

Verified User
The end of How Nietzsche Came in From the Cold reads like a cautionary tale about what Dwight Macdonald once called “fact-fetishism,” a holdover from the nineteenth century’s rationalism. Fittingly, then, it is Nietzsche who emerges as the most astute critic of all attempts to present his work “objectively”: “In opposition to Positivism,” he wrote in his notebooks, “which halts at phenomena and says ‘There are only facts and nothing more,’ I would say: No, facts are precisely what is lacking; all that exists consists of interpretations.”

 
The end of How Nietzsche Came in From the Cold reads like a cautionary tale about what Dwight Macdonald once called “fact-fetishism,” a holdover from the nineteenth century’s rationalism. Fittingly, then, it is Nietzsche who emerges as the most astute critic of all attempts to present his work “objectively”: “In opposition to Positivism,” he wrote in his notebooks, “which halts at phenomena and says ‘There are only facts and nothing more,’ I would say: No, facts are precisely what is lacking; all that exists consists of interpretations.”

He ended up talking to his horse
 
Back
Top