HRC corruption scandals just don't go away - the latest

C

Cancel 2018.1

New member
Hillary Clinton’s days of political relevance may be behind her, but her scandals are not. While Clinton’s years at the State Department were marred by scandal after scandal, they pale in comparison to her time running for higher office.

In 2016, the Democratic presidential candidate may have presided over the largest campaign finance scandal in U.S. history. A lawsuit based on federal records alleges the Clinton machine laundered $84 million in excessive six-figure contributions through the Hillary Victory Fund, to dozens of Democratic state parties, on to the Democratic National Committee (DNC), and ultimately to Clinton’s campaign.



Did Hillary Clinton, dozens of Democratic Party officials, and hundreds of liberal mega-donors break the law? The evidence—built entirely from Democrats’ own Federal Election Commission (FEC) reporters and public statements—clearly points to “yes.”

The lawsuit is likely to result in many more public documents being aired about what really went on behind the scenes in 2016, which is already giving rise to negative news coverage. In recent weeks, news stories from around the country have implicated Democratic state parties in Delaware, Kansas, Maine, Nevada, and other states for their part in papering over excessive donations from mega-donors like fashion icon Calvin Klein and “Family Guy” creator Seth MacFarlane to the Clinton campaign.

Reports say the Virginia Democratic Party, for example, was used to funnel nearly $2.4 million from the Hillary Victory Fund to the DNC during the 2016 election, retaining not a single penny from six-figure contributors who almost certainly understood how their money would flow. The Nevada Democratic Party is on the hook for roughly $1.6 million. Kansas Democrats, meanwhile, “can’t account for $900,000” in excessive funds.

Clinton’s campaign finance violations came to light last December, when the Committee to Defend the President filed a complaint with the FEC, documenting “an unprecedented, massive, nationwide multi-million dollar conspiracy.” The 101-page complaint is based entirely on FEC reports filed by Democrats, memos authored by Clinton campaign manager Robbie Mook, and public statements from former DNC chairwoman Donna Brazile and others.

After the FEC refused to act on the complaint within a statutory 120-day timeframe, the committee sued the FEC to force action, claiming its failure to act is “arbitrary, capricious, contrary to law, and an abuse of discretion.”

On Friday, the FEC made its first court filing. Tellingly, the agency didn’t challenge the committee’s legal arguments, or claim to be engaged in a diligent inquiry. Instead, the FEC filed a procedural “motion to dismiss,” arguing the law should be ignored so they can prevent outside groups from filing lawsuits to shield complicit Democrats. Democratic FEC Commissioner Ellen Weintraub called for just such a suit when it involved a Republican.


Last month, the liberal media predictably pilloried President Trump’s pardon of Dinesh D’Souza, who was prosecuted, convicted, and served eight months in a community confinement center and five years of probation for a similar campaign finance violation totaling $20,000 in straw man contributions. The Clinton machine stands accused of steering $84 million in straw man contributions to Hillary’s campaign—more than 4,000 times more!

Until the full truth comes out, Hillary Clinton and her enablers have plenty of reasons to be nervous—84 million of them.
https://thefederalist.com/2018/06/28/hillary-democrats-laundered-84-million-2016-face-justice/
Click to expand...

Lock her up.

Dinesh D’Souza was already locked up for doing the same with $20,000.
 
I see that this complaint came from the Committee to Defend the President. One might think they would have more to occupy them than "But Hillary!"

Did the FEC really argue that "the law should be ignored so they can prevent outside groups from filing lawsuits to shield complicit Democrats"? It seems unlikely, but if The Federalist says so ...
 
hating Hillary has become a religion. The believers believe absolutely anything. They never think" Wonder if that is true" it sounds weak. Nope. She apparently has a double secret record of felonies and crimes that the rightys cannot access. I suspect they would tell us all ,every day, all day long if they had it. but it exists, I believe it.
 
aloysious said:
Well the first one started with her miraculous 1,000% profit on her first and only cattle futures investment. As far as future scandals I can't start until they materialize, now can I?
Click to expand...

Explain how that is a scandal? Like Whitewater was, yet they lost money on it. You are just a hater teed up to believe whatever anti Hillary thing you read. Yet you are backing Trump, a real conman and crook.
 
aloysious said:
Reports say the Virginia Democratic Party, for example, was used to funnel nearly $2.4 million from the Hillary Victory Fund to the DNC during the 2016 election.
Click to expand...
is that the money used to bribe the wife of the guy investigating her for email violations?........
 
aloysious said:
They lost on a 1000% one time profit on a cattle futures investment??? Go back to 3rd grade arithmetic or look up the definition of profit.
Click to expand...

You haters are crazy. Hillary is a criminal because her server was not secure enough, but Trump does government business by Tweet. Can you imagine if she did that?

The Clintons made money in an investment. Big crime. Trump got money from Russian oligarchs and money launderers. that is fine. Not a crime no matter what he did.,
 
aloysious said:
They lost on a 1000% one time profit on a cattle futures investment??? Go back to 3rd grade arithmetic or look up the definition of profit.
Click to expand...

Didn't some of the folks who knew what really happened during Whitewater die in "unusual" circumstances?
 
Legion said:
Didn't some of the folks who knew what really happened during Whitewater die in "unusual" circumstances?
Click to expand...

not what you are asking. you are suggesting Clinton had them killed. Or maybe you think she invented death? People did not die until she came along. Crap like this should embarrass you.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top