Well, anyway, for an explanation, I have always been told that the shadow of the earth causes a new moon. Even though that model makes no sense and is completely obvious after you've watched this, it never occurred to me to challenge that idiocy in my head.
Well, anyway, for an explanation, I have always been told that the shadow of the earth causes a new moon. Even though that model makes no sense and is completely obvious after you've watched this, it never occurred to me to challenge that idiocy in my head.
I was being serious dickweed. I had heard that because our oceans have far more mass and weight then the moon, the tides had an affect on the moon, not the moon influencing the tides. Please correct me if I am in error cock smuggler.You're both idiots.
That's called an eclipse, Einstein. Its a small car made by some Japanese company.I have always been told that the shadow of the earth causes a new moon.
I was being serious dickweed. I had heard that because our oceans have far more mass and weight then the moon, the tides had an affect on the moon, not the moon influencing the tides. Please correct me if I am in error cock smuggler.
The shadow of the earth on the moon causes a lunar eclipse.Well, anyway, for an explanation, I have always been told that the shadow of the earth causes a new moon. Even though that model makes no sense and is completely obvious after you've watched this, it never occurred to me to challenge that idiocy in my head.
Groan
Judging by the title of this thread, I thought you saw a mirror.
And also, do NOT be an astronomy major. It gets waaaaaay harder than this.
Watermark; failed philosophy scholar.Thanks, Beefy, but this concept wasn't really that hard to grasp.
If you understood my point you'd understand why you're all idiots, but since you don't and will refuse to, and now that I have presented you with the information will, predictably, believe you always believed this way, I forgive you for your ignorance.
My chickens know that lunar eclipses and new moons are not the same thing.
Watermark; failed philosophy scholar.