I see, send armed forces to fight in Ukraine while UN troops take North America

David Jeffrey Spetch

Verified User
I see, send armed forces to fight in Ukraine while Globalist Crime organization troops from sock puppet UN invade North America?

What more convenient way to get USA and Canadian troops out of the way for UN to mobilize troops into North America in attempt to take full control / rip the rug out from under us. All planned perhaps?

send-armed-forces-to-fight-in-Ukraine.jpg


love

Primary Factual Fundamentalist
World Class Activist
David Jeffrey Spetch
Ps. Be good, be strong!
Hamilton Ontario Canada
 
I see, send armed forces to fight in Ukraine while Globalist Crime organization troops from sock puppet UN invade North America?

What more convenient way to get USA and Canadian troops out of the way for UN to mobilize troops into North America in attempt to take full control / rip the rug out from under us. All planned perhaps?

love

Primary Factual Fundamentalist
World Class Activist
David Jeffrey Spetch
Ps. Be good, be strong!
Hamilton Ontario Canada

Jeffrey, we have been hearing for years how the (powerless) U.N. is going to "invade" the U. S. At one time they were even going door-to-door in MS to take guns away. Or, when sites were declared World Heritage sites the U.N. was going to take over American parks. None of that ever happened.

Whose troops will they use? Only the Security Council can authorize military force and both the U. S. and Russia have a veto.
 
Jeffrey, we have been hearing for years how the (powerless) U.N. is going to "invade" the U. S. At one time they were even going door-to-door in MS to take guns away. Or, when sites were declared World Heritage sites the U.N. was going to take over American parks. None of that ever happened.

Whose troops will they use? Only the Security Council can authorize military force and both the U. S. and Russia have a veto.

Powerless yet UN troops are already in Canada. Powerless?!!

That was nutty even by your standards.

Oh right and all the other shady shit that has been going on the last decade never happened which doesn't qualify me the nutty one for putting that out there. The United Nations has already proven to be the Dividing Nations under guise of the UN of which already sent troops to Canada from what I have seen. Ukraine being invaded, the shady narrative unfolding in several countries simultaneously in modern day. You are the nutty one for trying to pass the possibility of such happening off like they would never. You need a crowbar to wrench your head out of there?

headupass.jpg


and once you manage to wrench it out of there realize that the USA has been stalked with an army as well

illegals-not-jabbed-citizens-jabbed.jpg
 
Jeffrey, we have been hearing for years how the (powerless) U.N. is going to "invade" the U. S. At one time they were even going door-to-door in MS to take guns away. Or, when sites were declared World Heritage sites the U.N. was going to take over American parks. None of that ever happened.

Whose troops will they use? Only the Security Council can authorize military force and both the U. S. and Russia have a veto.

Oh and what do we have here sonny bunch

Obama's EXECUTIVE ORDER: UNITED NATIONS ALLOWED TO USE FORCE ON US CITIZENS

https://wearechange.org/executive-order-united-nations-allowed-use-force-us-citizens/
 
Seems a bit of a conspiracy theory, eh? Will you apologize if UN forces do not invade or will you just wait and post more "theories" later.
 
Oh and what do we have here sonny bunch

Obama's EXECUTIVE ORDER: UNITED NATIONS ALLOWED TO USE FORCE ON US CITIZENS

https://wearechange.org/executive-order-united-nations-allowed-use-force-us-citizens/

There is not one word in that executive order about the United Nations. That was only the fake news that We Are Change site included in their scare tactic article to appeal to the right-wing.

If you read the explanation for the executive order included on the White House web site it is to protect civilians during counter-terrorism activities.

The explanation clearly says "In May 2013, President Obama issued Presidential Policy Guidance (PPG) that, among other things, set forth policy standards for U.S. direct action outside the United States and outside areas of active hostilities.

https://obamawhitehouse.archives.go...er-us-policy-pre-post-strike-measures-address
 
Not at all, I posed a question dumbass to raise awareness towards possibility.

Commas are important unless you think you posed a dumbass question then you have the adjective in the wrong place. If you wanted to call me a dumbass you would put a comma after question and dumbass... when writing it is important to use punctuation correctly so you can get your point across clearly.

In your (leading) "question dumbass" you didn't theorize an attack by the UN? So, what are you trying to make me aware of? It can't be an attack by the UN... because you seem to think that is a dumbass assumption.

Do you always ask leading "question dumbasses" and then pretend you didn't strongly support a theory in the paragraph preceding the "question dumbass" and get angry when someone asks if you will come here to apologize for wasting our time if your "question dumbass" prediction doesn't come true?
 
The problem with the entire theory is that the UN has no military of its own, UN forces would be peacekeepers sent from mostly the US.
 
I see, send armed forces to fight in Ukraine while Globalist Crime organization troops from sock puppet UN invade North America?

The US is not sending forces to Ukraine, and the UN does not have any troops of their own. The UN borrows troops from other countries. There is no way for the UN to borrow enough troops to invade the USA. It just is not going to happen.

Powerless yet UN troops are already in Canada. Powerless?!!

No, they are not. There are Quebec police in Canada... But we already knew that.

https://www.cnn.com/2022/02/22/politics/fact-check-un-north-bay-ottawa-trudeau/index.html
 
Back
Top