ICE lied. Again.

Crepitus

Crepitus

Verified User

Federal judge dismisses indictment against TikToker shot by ICE, citing constitutional violations​


They accused this person of "weaponizing his vehicle" and trying to run down agents.

Turns out not to be the case, as often happens when ICE is involved.

The video captures an ICE officer holding a gun in one hand and using the other to break open the window of Parias' car. As the officer shouts at Parias to turn off the car, Parias raises his hands in the air and asks why he is being detained. The officer repeatedly tries to open the passenger side door, before moving the gun to his left hand, right before firing.

At the time, Parias' car did not appear to be moving.



"Oh," the officer said, sounding surprised. "F—."

"Who shot?" someone asked.

"I shot, I shot," the officer responded.

They got together and decided to lie to get away with shooting an unarmed civilian.

This seems to be poretty much SOP where ICE is involved.
 
Trumps DoJ is populated by MOB lawyers. The type who were never given the benefit of the doubt, in courts generally and always had to back up what they said with proof.

They are enjoying being the DoJ who did get the benefit of the doubt ('Presumption of Regularity') and have abused it by lying CONSTANTLY in courts but that presumption of regularity is ending now as most judges now EXPECT Trump's DoJ is likely lying and they really scrutinize the claims and demand proof.

Chief amongst that now is the Abrego Garcia case which the judge cancelled and instead said lets FIRST due a full evidentiary hearing to determine whether this is selective and vindicative prosecution or not, something almost no judges would do prior to this.

But the Judge knows NOT to trust the motivations of Trump DoJ and give them any benefit of the doubt.

Hearing set on whether Kilmar Abrego Garcia is being vindictively prosecuted​

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top