If Janet Reno had 'summarized' Starr's Watergate Report no big deal, eh?

They would still be screaming for Reno’s head. Saw her sister the other day BTW, she is not well.
 
Centerleftfl said:
Imagine for a NY second, had RENO summarized.
Click to expand...


this whole situation REALLY illustrates well how far to the Right the MSM and general population really are

the Congress actually impeached a president for lying on a deposition about an affair...........meanwhile this asshole 'president' pays off porn stars and Bunnies, gets intel from the Russians to 'win' his election, and is by far the biggest crook/con man anyone's ever seen, selling out America at bargain basement prices

fuckin unreal
 
So, you snowflakes think that the Starr report was not redacted prior to release? :laugh:

Even Nadler went on Charlie Rose's show in 1998 to push back against the Republican demand that the voluminous report should be made public. “It’s grand jury material. It represents statements which may or may not be true by various witnesses," Nadler said. "Salacious material. All kinds of material that it would be unfair to release.”
All kinds of stuff was in there that the Dems did not want to be made public.

So, you see? This is a legal procedure we're dealing with here. Get over it.
 
Teflon Don said:
Really? Reno was involved with Watergate?

Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahah


Give it up

Hey didn’t the demalquedacrats give Barr a deadline? Didn’t he miss it? Kinda told them to fuck themselves
Click to expand...

:good4u:
I know right? Watergate!!!??????? :laugh:
 
Teflon Don said:
Really? Reno was involved with Watergate?

Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahah


Give it up

Hey didn’t the demalquedacrats give Barr a deadline? Didn’t he miss it? Kinda told them to fuck themselves
Click to expand...

Completely ignorant and deep in TDS. Trump is above the law, is he?

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
Jarod said:
They would still be screaming for Reno’s head. Saw her sister the other day BTW, she is not well.
Click to expand...
Just like they're still screaming for Hillary's head, after years of witch hunts came up with nada.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
Stretch said:
So, you snowflakes think that the Starr report was not redacted prior to release? [emoji23]

Even Nadler went on Charlie Rose's show in 1998 to push back against the Republican demand that the voluminous report should be made public. “It’s grand jury material. It represents statements which may or may not be true by various witnesses," Nadler said. "Salacious material. All kinds of material that it would be unfair to release.”
All kinds of stuff was in there that the Dems did not want to be made public.

So, you see? This is a legal procedure we're dealing with here. Get over it.
Click to expand...
No, it's obstruction. Just an excuse for removing anything that might implicate Trump.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
reagansghost said:
this whole situation REALLY illustrates well how far to the Right the MSM and general population really are

the Congress actually impeached a president for lying on a deposition about an affair...........meanwhile this asshole 'president' pays off porn stars and Bunnies, gets intel from the Russians to 'win' his election, and is by far the biggest crook/con man anyone's ever seen, selling out America at bargain basement prices

fuckin unreal
Click to expand...

Can anyone be this stupid?
 
reagansghost said:
this whole situation REALLY illustrates well how far to the Right the MSM and general population really are

the Congress actually impeached a president for lying on a deposition about an affair...........meanwhile this asshole 'president' pays off porn stars and Bunnies, gets intel from the Russians to 'win' his election, and is by far the biggest crook/con man anyone's ever seen, selling out America at bargain basement prices

fuckin unreal
Click to expand...

Whatever you think about any of this, it is indisputable that Trump "is by far the biggest crook/con man anyone's ever seen".

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
rjhenn said:
You do appear to be. What facts did he have in error?

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Anyone who says Trump "gets intel from the Russians to 'win' his election and is by far the biggest crook/con man anyone's ever seen, selling out America at bargain basement prices" is a fool.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top