Your choice to disregard logic in favor of your emotional attachment to atheism.

As for Pascal, there's the man and there's the decision tree. The decision tree is logical. Human beings, by their very nature, are flawed.
FWIW, Christian nationalists are not Christians. It's an oxymoron with an emphasis on moron.
You never heard of the Four Horsemen of New Atheism? Let me help you:
en.wikipedia.org
Major figures of New Atheism include Sam Harris, Richard Dawkins, Daniel Dennett, and Christopher Hitchens,[3] collectively referred to as the "Four Horsemen" of the movement.[5] Proponents of the New Atheist movement have experienced some controversy and criticisms from academics and other atheists.
https://cnyepiscopal.org/2024/08/01...w-does-it-distort-the-gospel-of-jesus-christ/
Rather than seeing beauty in the wide variety of humanity in America, Christian nationalists single out one segment of society and hold up those who espouse an abridged version of Christianity as the exemplar for all. And while Christian nationalists overtly focus on religion, racist, sexist, and anti-LGBTQIA rhetoric often is employed.
Christian nationalism truncates the Gospel of Jesus Christ. The emphasis is on personal salvation and often downplays or ignores the social responsibilities of the Gospel.
Two of the worst words in the Church today is "Christian Nationalism." Neither are Christian or from this nation. Both should be understood!
www.patheos.com
The roots of Christian nationalism are not biblical—they are theosophical, political and ethnocentric.
Throughout Western history, Christian nationalism has been used as a veneer to justify imperialism, colonialism and ethnic domination. If that sounds like a fascist regime, it should. The idea emerged during Constantine’s era when the Roman Empire insisted on the Christian faith as a civic identity. Centuries of political Christianity followed through crusades, inquisitions and enemies of the state. Power became a sacrament and force masquerading as theology.
Consider this: Just because the emperor was an advocate for Christianity doesn’t make what he did to force the issue any less fascist.
The American version of Christian nationalism dates back to colonial Puritanism, which saw the New World as a “city on a hill.” Yet the Constitution of the United States directly opposes any such union, with the First Amendment forbidding the establishment of religion. Despite this, figures throughout American history have continued to equate patriotism with Christianity.