Ignorance and the Bible

Blind guess is making a random, uninformed, without evidence nor knowledge. The Biblical scholars, those atheists I refer to, are more knowledgeable, more informed, more intellectual and have studied the evidence more than you and I ever will.

Your “blind guess” mantra fails on all accounts.
It doesn't, but I see you have a problem with that.

That is your problem...not mine.
 
Pascals
Your choice to disregard logic in favor of your emotional attachment to atheism. :) As for Pascal, there's the man and there's the decision tree. The decision tree is logical. Human beings, by their very nature, are flawed.

FWIW, Christian nationalists are not Christians. It's an oxymoron with an emphasis on moron.

You never heard of the Four Horsemen of New Atheism? Let me help you:
Major figures of New Atheism include Sam Harris, Richard Dawkins, Daniel Dennett, and Christopher Hitchens,[3] collectively referred to as the "Four Horsemen" of the movement.[5] Proponents of the New Atheist movement have experienced some controversy and criticisms from academics and other atheists.


https://cnyepiscopal.org/2024/08/01...w-does-it-distort-the-gospel-of-jesus-christ/
Rather than seeing beauty in the wide variety of humanity in America, Christian nationalists single out one segment of society and hold up those who espouse an abridged version of Christianity as the exemplar for all. And while Christian nationalists overtly focus on religion, racist, sexist, and anti-LGBTQIA rhetoric often is employed.

Christian nationalism truncates the Gospel of Jesus Christ. The emphasis is on personal salvation and often downplays or ignores the social responsibilities of the Gospel.


The roots of Christian nationalism are not biblical—they are theosophical, political and ethnocentric.

Throughout Western history, Christian nationalism has been used as a veneer to justify imperialism, colonialism and ethnic domination. If that sounds like a fascist regime, it should. The idea emerged during Constantine’s era when the Roman Empire insisted on the Christian faith as a civic identity. Centuries of political Christianity followed through crusades, inquisitions and enemies of the state. Power became a sacrament and force masquerading as theology.

Consider this: Just because the emperor was an advocate for Christianity doesn’t make what he did to force the issue any less fascist.


The American version of Christian nationalism dates back to colonial Puritanism, which saw the New World as a “city on a hill.” Yet the Constitution of the United States directly opposes any such union, with the First Amendment forbidding the establishment of religion. Despite this, figures throughout American history have continued to equate patriotism with Christianity.
Pascals Wager fails from the beginning with his failed premise and over simplification. Simple logic says when the premise is false, the conclusions are invalid.

Who are you to define whether Christian nationalists are Christian or not? They define themselves that way. They adhere to the basic Christian dogma, don’t they? The Trinity. Resurrection. All that bullshit, right?

I know full well those 4 atheists. Don’t much give a shit about Dawkins. Dennett and Hitchens were two forces to be reckoned with, but are dead now. Harris? A shit load smarter than the apologists he destroys.
 
Pascals

Pascals Wager fails from the beginning with his failed premise and over simplification. Simple logic says when the premise is false, the conclusions are invalid.

Who are you to define whether Christian nationalists are Christian or not? They define themselves that way. They adhere to the basic Christian dogma, don’t they? The Trinity. Resurrection. All that bullshit, right?

I know full well those 4 atheists. Don’t much give a shit about Dawkins. Dennett and Hitchens were two forces to be reckoned with, but are dead now. Harris? A shit load smarter than the apologists he destroys.
Sam Harris is blithering Nazi moron.

:truestory:
 
Back
Top