In a biblical sense…

Jarod

Well-known member
Contributor
In a biblical sense…

Is Rump’s third marriage, the one to the ”First Lady” valid? Can a fundamental consider them legally married, or are they committing adultery in the White House?
 
In a biblical sense…

Is Rump’s third marriage, the one to the ”First Lady” valid? Can a fundamental consider them legally married, or are they committing adultery in the White House?

If God abhors homosexuals, does he not abhor adulterers?

The 10commandments.
 
In a biblical sense…

Is Rump’s third marriage, the one to the ”First Lady” valid? Can a fundamental consider them legally married, or are they committing adultery in the White House?

[h=2]Luke 16:18[/h]“Whoever divorces his wife and marries another commits adultery; and whoever marries her who is divorced from her husband commits adultery.”
 
[h=2]Luke 16:18[/h]“Whoever divorces his wife and marries another commits adultery; and whoever marries her who is divorced from her husband commits adultery.”

Trump is actively committing adultery in the White House. The same people who support him hate homosexuals. Adultery is against the 10 Commandments.

Hypocrisy abounds.
 
Funny... They let an active adulterer live in the White House while actively campaigning to discriminate against homosexuals.
 
Why did you let Bill Clinton in the White House Jarod?

He was not an active adulterer, he did it once and apologized. Rump is living with his mistress, in a biblical sense. They want to discriminate against homosexuals because of the Bible.... but ignore what Rump is doing even if what he is doing is against the 10 Commandments.
 
He was not an active adulterer, he did it once and apologized. Rump is living with his mistress, in a biblical sense. They want to discriminate against homosexuals because of the Bible.... but ignore what Rump is doing even if what he is doing is against the 10 Commandments.

El Oh Elle, cheating with Lewinski wasn’t adultry? Signing the defense of marriage act was discrimstion?

FFS, do you have any principles other being against Trump?
 
He was not an active adulterer, he did it once and apologized. Rump is living with his mistress, in a biblical sense. They want to discriminate against homosexuals because of the Bible.... but ignore what Rump is doing even if what he is doing is against the 10 Commandments.

Then there's those other easily-forgotten-by-the-Reichtard-evangelists commandments: Coveting your neighbor's wife and/or possessions, bearing false witness (i.e. lying your large orange ass off constantly), forgetting to keep the Sabbath holy, worshiping false idols (money, gold calves, etc.), stealing (i.e. not paying his debts).
 
Then there's those other easily-forgotten-by-the-Reichtard-evangelists commandments: Coveting your neighbor's wife and/or possessions, bearing false witness (i.e. lying your large orange ass off constantly), forgetting to keep the Sabbath holy, worshiping false idols (money, gold calves, etc.), stealing (i.e. not paying his debts).

Take it from me, I would say that "bearing false witness" is by far the most common sin on this forum by reichwingers, and almost always done without a hint of remorse or conscience.

I would say my most common infraction of the commandments, is my God-damned tendency to use the lord's name in vain.
 
He was not an active adulterer, he did it once and apologized. Rump is living with his mistress, in a biblical sense. They want to discriminate against homosexuals because of the Bible.... but ignore what Rump is doing even if what he is doing is against the 10 Commandments.

He did it once???? That’s such a blantantly false lie. He’s been accused of rape but it’s ok because he apologized? You’re a perfect example of why the #metoo movement is a joke. It’s all about political power. You don’t care about anything else
 
In a biblical sense…

Is Rump’s third marriage, the one to the ”First Lady” valid? Can a fundamental consider them legally married, or are they committing adultery in the White House?

What do know, or care about, "muh Biblical sense"? STFU
 
El Oh Elle, cheating with Lewinski wasn’t adultry? Signing the defense of marriage act was discrimstion?

FFS, do you have any principles other being against Trump?

He was not openly living with Lewinski. Anyway Clinton was 20 years ago. And I’m not the one using the Bible as justification for discriminating against Homosexuals.
 
He did it once???? That’s such a blantantly false lie. He’s been accused of rape but it’s ok because he apologized? You’re a perfect example of why the #metoo movement is a joke. It’s all about political power. You don’t care about anything else

Oh, so if you have been accused of something, that means you did it?
 
The evangelicals who use the Bible to justify discrimination against homosexuals but accept Trumps third marriage are hypocrites wh do not believe in the Bible.
 
I think that's allowed as long as it's not under oath. Anyway they don't seem to mind.

Nope, not in the slightest. Their entire rationalization seems to be something along the lines of "God uses even the worst ppl doing the worst things in order to promote his agenda." In other words, as long as the evil-doer is someone whose politics they approve of, he gets a pass. Hitler is a good example of this. Guess who else is?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top