Inadvertent Price supports

Minerva

New member
Inadvertent price supports are what you get when a commodity is made or grown scarce. Pot growers for years could count on the DEA or other federal or local agents to make pot scarce enough to constitute an informal net of price supports. Will pot growers now need secure systems around their devalued fields? Will they continue to booby trap their crop? Why would they? The romance, the lure of the latterday outlawry will be gone. Pot farmers will pay taxes like everybody else, show up at civic meetings and lead boy scout troops. Presumably the music and tattoos will linger to the last until some grandbaby asks about a particular scar or tattoo, or the older teen-agers forget the songs. Gramps, why did they call them the Dooby Brothers. Look Grandpa, doesn't he have the same tattoo you have? What leaf is that, anyway?

That is when the last of the drug growers will finally be gone, perhaps to become the subject of a historic novel. I suppose you could say it was colorful.And it was profitable. And it required very little capital. And it kept vice officers gainfully employed.

What other vices, major or minor, shall we choose next to outlaw?If we choose that, it will create a considerable chunk of economy, one we can tax with a clear conscience.
 
Inadvertent price supports are what you get when a commodity is made or grown scarce. Pot growers for years could count on the DEA or other federal or local agents to make pot scarce enough to constitute an informal net of price supports. Will pot growers now need secure systems around their devalued fields? Will they continue to booby trap their crop? Why would they? The romance, the lure of the latterday outlawry will be gone. Pot farmers will pay taxes like everybody else, show up at civic meetings and lead boy scout troops. Presumably the music and tattoos will linger to the last until some grandbaby asks about a particular scar or tattoo, or the older teen-agers forget the songs. Gramps, why did they call them the Dooby Brothers. Look Grandpa, doesn't he have the same tattoo you have? What leaf is that, anyway?

That is when the last of the drug growers will finally be gone, perhaps to become the subject of a historic novel. I suppose you could say it was colorful.And it was profitable. And it required very little capital. And it kept vice officers gainfully employed.

What other vices, major or minor, shall we choose next to outlaw?If we choose that, it will create a considerable chunk of economy, one we can tax with a clear conscience.

Anytime there is a large number of people that want something and the government makes it illegal, an illegal group of people get together to supply the want. hence, the government helps to not only provide price supports, but creates two criminal classes, the providers and the users :eek:
 
Inadvertent price supports are what you get when a commodity is made or grown scarce. Pot growers for years could count on the DEA or other federal or local agents to make pot scarce enough to constitute an informal net of price supports. Will pot growers now need secure systems around their devalued fields? Will they continue to booby trap their crop? Why would they? The romance, the lure of the latterday outlawry will be gone. Pot farmers will pay taxes like everybody else, show up at civic meetings and lead boy scout troops. Presumably the music and tattoos will linger to the last until some grandbaby asks about a particular scar or tattoo, or the older teen-agers forget the songs. Gramps, why did they call them the Dooby Brothers. Look Grandpa, doesn't he have the same tattoo you have? What leaf is that, anyway?

That is when the last of the drug growers will finally be gone, perhaps to become the subject of a historic novel. I suppose you could say it was colorful.And it was profitable. And it required very little capital. And it kept vice officers gainfully employed.

What other vices, major or minor, shall we choose next to outlaw?If we choose that, it will create a considerable chunk of economy, one we can tax with a clear conscience.

We could start by relegalizing organ selling so people have more incentive to help others and themselves with their organs. After all people have a right over their own body.
 
We could start by relegalizing organ selling so people have more incentive to help others and themselves with their organs. After all people have a right over their own body.

you mean it is not legal? no one told me...

illegal organ traffic already exists and is getting more common ever year

even organs that can only be 'harvested' by killing the 'donor'

of course if bush had not banned stem cell research we could have had organs from stem cells by now or at least sooner

would it not be wonderful if we could kill the illegal organ market
 
Back
Top