Insurrection: Revolting Against Civil Authority Or Government

PoliTalker

Diversity Makes Greatness
There seems to be a misunderstanding of what an insurrection is.

Let us review the definition of the word:

Merriam Webster: "an act or instance of revolting against civil authority or an established government"

Seems pretty clear.

January 6th meets the definition.

But the Trump Party is struggling with this.

If they are going to embrace the act, at least own the word.
 
"Following the insurrection and attack on the Capitol on January 6, 2021, the American public was left with countless questions about how such a violent assault on our democracy could have happened. Since then, CREW has taken legal, investigative and policy action to get answers and accountability.

The ongoing work includes:

-Criminal complaints against President Trump and senior Trump administration officials

-A Freedom of Information Act lawsuit against the Department of Justice, Department of Homeland Security, Department of Defense, Department of the Army and Department of the Interior

-Analysis and publication of documents obtained through records requests and lawsuits

-Live tracking of corporate donations to members of the Sedition Caucus—the 147 members of Congress who voted to reject one or more states’ election results

-Advocacy for a strong and thorough investigation in the House of Representatives"

Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington
 
There seems to be a misunderstanding of what an insurrection is.

Let us review the definition of the word:

Merriam Webster: "an act or instance of revolting against civil authority or an established government"

Seems pretty clear.

January 6th meets the definition.

But the Trump Party is struggling with this.

If they are going to embrace the act, at least own the word.

Disingenuous Deplorables are going to cling by the fingernails to the assertion insurrection cannot be real unless a criminal conviction is made in court.

Which is like saying infidelity cannot be real unless it is documented in a divorce proceeding.
 
There seems to be a cognitive disconnect by Democrats, and those on the Left. Insurrection requires insurrectionists, and given the number of people arrested for the Jan 6 riot, if it were an "insurrection" you'd think at least a few of those would have been charged with that, but none have.

What if you held an insurrection and no insurrectionists showed up...?
 
Hello Cypress,

Disingenuous Deplorables are going to cling by the fingernails to the assertion insurrection cannot be real unless a criminal conviction is made in court.

Which is like saying infidelity cannot be real unless it is documented in a divorce proceeding.

What an excellent point.
 
There seems to be a misunderstanding of what an insurrection is.

Let us review the definition of the word:

Merriam Webster: "an act or instance of revolting against civil authority or an established government"

Seems pretty clear.

January 6th meets the definition.

But the Trump Party is struggling with this.

If they are going to embrace the act, at least own the word.

That's the dumbest shit I have seen on the protest. Trying to re-define the true meaning only makes leftists look dumber and less honest.

Essential Meaning of insurrection : a usually violent attempt to take control of a government He led an armed insurrection [=rebellion, uprising] against the elected government. acts of insurrection Full Definition of insurrection : an act or instance of revolting against civil authority or an established government

Let's be clear; the ONLY people who got killed that day were UNARMED protestors. One, a military veteran, was shot by a black police officer while UNARMED.

There was no insurrection. There was no real effort to overturn the Government. Making claims like this diminish the real meaning and make the morons who suggest such stupidity look dumber.

It's similar to labeling anyone who you disagree with a racist or White Supremacist. After a while, people point at you and laugh.
 
"Following the insurrection and attack on the Capitol on January 6, 2021, the American public was left with countless questions about how such a violent assault on our democracy could have happened. Since then, CREW has taken legal, investigative and policy action to get answers and accountability.

The ongoing work includes:

-Criminal complaints against President Trump and senior Trump administration officials

-A Freedom of Information Act lawsuit against the Department of Justice, Department of Homeland Security, Department of Defense, Department of the Army and Department of the Interior

-Analysis and publication of documents obtained through records requests and lawsuits

-Live tracking of corporate donations to members of the Sedition Caucus—the 147 members of Congress who voted to reject one or more states’ election results

-Advocacy for a strong and thorough investigation in the House of Representatives"

Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington

This commentary begs the question, why is Ray Epps still a free man?

https://www.justplainpolitics.com/showthread.php?178792-Who-is-Ray-Epps-Why-has-he-not-been-arrested
 
Disingenuous Deplorables are going to cling by the fingernails to the assertion insurrection cannot be real unless a criminal conviction is made in court.

Which is like saying infidelity cannot be real unless it is documented in a divorce proceeding.

Wrong again; we are pointing at jackasses like you and laughing at how gullible, dishonest and stupid you are. :laugh:
 
There seems to be a cognitive disconnect by Democrats, and those on the Left. Insurrection requires insurrectionists, and given the number of people arrested for the Jan 6 riot, if it were an "insurrection" you'd think at least a few of those would have been charged with that, but none have.

What if you held an insurrection and no insurrectionists showed up...?

:laugh:

:thumbsup:
 
Only one thing will free some of their minds from this evil
GOVERNMENT BULLETS

There you have it from the Government Fascist dipshit. Any questions?

th


"When government fears the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny."
 
Lying about on the internets about what happened on J6 will line you up for government bullets


Reap what you have sowed
 
Who do you have to now fight for your new Tucker lie fool?



Government bullets


Tucker won’t be protecting you when you idiots start your little dreamed of race war


He will be in hiding


You will be catching the government bullets for him
 
That's the dumbest shit I have seen on the protest. Trying to re-define the true meaning only makes leftists look dumber and less honest.

Essential Meaning of insurrection : a usually violent attempt to take control of a government He led an armed insurrection [=rebellion, uprising] against the elected government. acts of insurrection Full Definition of insurrection : an act or instance of revolting against civil authority or an established government

Let's be clear; the ONLY people who got killed that day were UNARMED protestors. One, a military veteran, was shot by a black police officer while UNARMED.

There was no insurrection. There was no real effort to overturn the Government. Making claims like this diminish the real meaning and make the morons who suggest such stupidity look dumber.

It's similar to labeling anyone who you disagree with a racist or White Supremacist. After a while, people point at you and laugh.




Your argument is not with politalker


It’s with every dictionary and encyclopedia that exists
 
Back
Top