INTERNATIONAL WOMENS' DAY

moon

moon

Satire for Sanity
This past year, Israel's Jews have been the reason for that stain- and American women have helped elect a brutal Zionist misogynist.


womens-day.jpg



www.presstv.ir

Women’s Day: Hamas blasts Israeli killing of 12,000 women in Gaza as ‘stain on humanity’

Hamas says the killing of more than 12,000 Palestinian women in the Gaza Strip as a result of the Israeli genocidal war on the coastal territory marks a “stain on humanity.”
www.presstv.ir www.presstv.ir
 
FastLane said:
Sign me up!!!
Click to expand...


Sign yourself up.


ildu.com.ua

Join the Brave

International Legion for the Defence of Ukraine formed by Presidential decree right after the outbreak of full-scale russian invasion, the Legion has taken part in the majority of the crucial campaigns and battles of the war. The International Legion consists of infantry and special task...
ildu.com.ua ildu.com.ua


Naturally, I'll understand if you don't, of course.
 
christiefan915 said:
A solution looking for a problem.
Click to expand...

Is that so?

There is evidence that a female volleyball player, Payton McNabb, suffered a brain injury after being struck in the head by a ball spiked by a transgender athlete during a high school match in North Carolina in September 2022.

McNabb, then a senior at Hiwassee Dam High School, was hit during a game against Highlands High School. The incident caused a traumatic brain injury, including a concussion, a brain bleed, and long-term effects such as partial paralysis on her right side, loss of peripheral vision, memory issues, severe headaches, anxiety, and depression.

Video footage of the incident exists, showing her being knocked unconscious for about 30 seconds after the spike, which some reports estimate traveled at around 70 mph—described as unusually fast for a girls’ high school game.

McNabb’s account is supported by her testimony to the North Carolina legislature in April 2023, where she advocated for the Fairness in Women’s Sports Act, which later passed, banning transgender athletes from female sports teams in the state at middle school, high school, and college levels. She has also detailed her ongoing recovery in a 2024 documentary, Kill Shot: How Payton McNabb Turned Tragedy Into Triumph.


Let the record reflect that hugely hyper-hypocritical @christiefan915 consents to men physically injuring girls, by her own standard:

christiefan915 said:

silence means consent​

"If you do not voice your objection to something, then it is assumed that you support it."

idioms.thefreedictionary.com

silence means consent

Definition of silence means consent in the Idioms Dictionary by The Free Dictionary
idioms.thefreedictionary.com idioms.thefreedictionary.com
Click to expand...
 
Diogenes said:
:nono:

Whataboutism.

Start a thread about it and post verifiable examples if it concerns you.

I'll understand if you don't, of course.
Click to expand...
Exposing hypocrisy is about highlighting a genuine contradiction between someone’s stated principles and their actions or words. It’s typically a good-faith critique aimed at revealing a lack of integrity or authenticity. For example, if someone claims to be a staunch environmentalist but regularly flies private jets, pointing that out exposes their hypocrisy. The focus is on the individual or group and their failure to align behavior with their own declared standards.

Whataboutism, on the other hand, is a rhetorical tactic—often a deflection—used to shift focus away from the issue at hand by bringing up an unrelated or loosely related counterexample. It’s less about genuine critique and more about dodging accountability or muddying the waters. For instance, if someone criticizes a politician for corruption, and the response is, “What about that other politician who did the same thing?”—that’s whataboutism. It sidesteps the original point rather than engaging with it directly.

The key difference lies in purpose and relevance: exposing hypocrisy seeks to hold someone accountable to their own standards, while whataboutism usually aims to distract or derail the conversation by pointing elsewhere. Hypocrisy critiques are inward-looking (at the subject’s own contradictions), whereas whataboutism is outward-looking (at someone else’s flaws).

Grok
 
christiefan915 said:
Whataboutism, on the other hand, is a rhetorical tactic—often a deflection—used to shift focus away from the issue at hand by bringing up an unrelated or loosely related counterexample. It’s less about genuine critique and more about dodging accountability or muddying the waters. For instance, if someone criticizes a politician for corruption, and the response is, “What about that other politician who did the same thing?”—that’s whataboutism. It sidesteps the original point rather than engaging with it directly.
Click to expand...


Like Grok said; what you tried to pull off was whataboutism, a rhetorical tactic—often a deflection—used to shift focus away from the issue at hand by bringing up an unrelated or loosely related counterexample. It’s less about genuine critique and more about dodging accountability or muddying the waters. For instance, if someone criticizes a politician for corruption, and the response is, “What about that other politician who did the same thing?”—that’s whataboutism. It sidesteps the original point rather than engaging with it directly.

:nodyes:
 
Diogenes said:
Like Grok said; what you tried to pull off was whataboutism, a rhetorical tactic—often a deflection—used to shift focus away from the issue at hand by bringing up an unrelated or loosely related counterexample. It’s less about genuine critique and more about dodging accountability or muddying the waters. For instance, if someone criticizes a politician for corruption, and the response is, “What about that other politician who did the same thing?”—that’s whataboutism. It sidesteps the original point rather than engaging with it directly.

:nodyes:
Click to expand...
Christians who demean women are hypocrites.

Exposing hypocrisy is about highlighting a genuine contradiction between someone’s stated principles and their actions or words. It’s typically a good-faith critique aimed at revealing a lack of integrity or authenticity. For example, if someone claims to be a staunch environmentalist but regularly flies private jets, pointing that out exposes their hypocrisy. The focus is on the individual or group and their failure to align behavior with their own declared standards.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top