Like tranny freaks?
What irony?
She rails against transgender children.What irony?
Incomplete thought.It is an irony that the author of a book about a person born one thing but forced to deny that until he awakens to the reality that he isn't what he always thought he was.
I have no idea what "TERF" means. Is it an acronym for something?The whole TERF thing is a fraught topic
Women's issues ARE being subsumed... ignored (by libtards), even. Women are currently getting the ever loving shit beat out of them by gender-confused men, and libtards, who otherwise screech about "women's rights" (especially re: the abortion issue), are now actively cheering on said woman-beating (so long as it occurs during a sanctioned sporting event).since some women feel that women's issues are now being subsumed by the trans thing diluting the meaning of their identity.
No, it isn't. It's as simple as can be. Nobody is "born trans". In fact, there technically isn't even a such thing as a "trans" person. There are only two genders: male and female. All people are male or female, determined by genetics (specifically, X & Y chromosomes).This is always going to be a hard topic.
Don't lump all humans into this; this is mainly a libtard problem. I've already explained to you (in the past) why that is.I guess the best anyone can do is just to live and let live. But humans don't do that so well.
No, she rails against parents harming their children by confusing them about their gender.She rails against transgender children.
What's the difference? She advocates forcing children to be who they are not. She's not for trans children.No, she rails against parents harming their children by confusing them about their gender.
One exists; the other doesn't.What's the difference?
Wrong again. She advocates for being honest about one's gender.She advocates forcing children to be who they are not.
There's no such thing as "trans children".She's not for trans children.
Trans children exist. You'll just have to cope.One exists; the other doesn't.
Wrong again. She advocates for being honest about one's gender.
There's no such thing as "trans children".
Where? Show me an example of someone who is biologically "transgender".Trans children exist.
You'll just have to start being honest.You'll just have to cope.
I am honest.Where? Show me an example of someone who is biologically "transgender".
You'll just have to start being honest.
Here, you are assuming the existence of people who are biologically "transgender" in your attempt to prove their existence.I am honest.
MRI studies on transgender people
Here, you are confusing one's belief with one's biology.suggest they do identify as the opposite gender. That's biological.
It is not a belief. The brain is either male or female.Here, you are assuming the existence of people who are biologically "transgender" in your attempt to prove their existence.
Invalid. Try again.
Here, you are confusing one's belief with one's biology.
Incomplete thought.
In the Harry Potter series of books, magical ability is genetic, so when you say "born one thing...", you can only logically be referring to genetics.
I have no idea what "TERF" means. Is it an acronym for something?
Women's issues ARE being subsumed... ignored (by libtards), even. Women are currently getting the ever loving shit beat out of them by gender-confused men, and libtards, who otherwise screech about "women's rights" (especially re: the abortion issue), are now actively cheering on said woman-beating (so long as it occurs during a sanctioned sporting event).
Libtards HATE women, plain and simple. They only pretend to advocate for "women's rights" whenever they are attempting to off a woman's unborn child). It brings libtards pleasure to watch gender-confused men beating the ever loving SHIT out of women at sanctioned sporting events.
No, it isn't. It's as simple as can be. Nobody is "born trans". In fact, there technically isn't even a such thing as a "trans" person. There are only two genders: male and female. All people are male or female, determined by genetics (specifically, X & Y chromosomes).
Don't lump all humans into this; this is mainly a libtard problem. I've already explained to you (in the past) why that is.
So you're unwilling to help out other people? Unwilling to teach them new things? How "inclusive" of you!Ummmm, maybe if you don't know the lingo (TERF) then you might want to reconsider your points.
In order for an acronym to mean something, you need to specify what it means at the outset before using it in the future. For instance, instead of just saying WELS and expecting everyone else to know what you mean by that, you could instead say Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod (WELS) and then shorten that to WELS in your future references of the term.I find it more interesting to debate people who actually know what the fuck they are talking about.
So you're unwilling to help out other people?
Unwilling to teach them new things?
How "inclusive" of you!
In order for an acronym to mean something, you need to specify what it means at the outset before using it in the future.
For instance, instead of just saying WELS and expecting everyone else to know what you mean by that, you could instead say Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod (WELS) and then shorten that to WELS in your future references of the term.
I did look up the TERF acronym just now, because you aren't "inclusive" nor "loving" enough to help out a fellow human, and apparently it stands for 'trans-exclusive radical feminist', whatever THAT is supposed to mean. There is no such thing as a 'trans person'; the biology doesn't exist. There is no "transgender gene" or "transgender chromosome". There are only two genders; male (XY) and female (XX). Males have a Y chromosome; females don't.
IOW, you don't "practice what you preach" and you are tipping your king.Jackasses? No I don't feel the need to help them out.
Yup.
Who said I was inclusive? I don't have to be inclusive of jackasses.
But the other poster chose to respond rather than look it up. Dumbass.
I don't care what you think on this topic. Really you are less than meaningless to me.
IOW, you don't "practice what you preach"
and you are tipping your king.
I think we're done here.
This phrase is almost always followed with a statement that is completely different from the statement that I actually made. You're not willing to help out your fellow human when he has a simple question about what a particular acronym means. You HATE anyone who isn't "like you", plain and simple. How "inclusive" of you!So you're saying that
See above.because I want to be tolerant I have to be tolerant of intolerance? You do realize it doesn't work that way, right?
I'm posting under the only name that I have. "tipping your king" is a common expression, known to (and used by) anyone who is familiar with chess.Thanks IBDaMann. Why did you post under this name today?