Is anyone surprised?

archives

Verified User
"Devin Nunes Won’t Say if He Worked With White House on Anti-FBI Memo"

"The Republican chairman of the House intelligence committee refused to answer when a colleague asked him if he had coordinated his incendiary surveillance memo with the White House"

"During Monday’s contentious closed-door committee meeting, Rep. Mike Quigley, a Democrat, asked Nunes point-blank if his staffers had been talking with the White House as they compiled a four-page memo alleging FBI and Justice Department abuses over surveillance of President Trump’s allies in the Russia probe."

"According to sources familiar with the exchange, Nunes made a few comments that didn’t answer the question before finally responding, “I’m not answering.”

https://www.thedailybeast.com/devin...e-on-anti-fbi-memo?source=twitter&via=desktop

This morning on CNN Huckabee wouldn't confirm nor deny White House involvement in Nunes's memo

Did anyone really doubt that the White House authored the memo, tells one exactly what it is, which is only further endorsed considering Nunes's Committee now won't allow the release of a Democrat memo rebuking everything in the White House's memo

One thing this Administration has definitely established itself as is probably the most dishonest in American history
 
wait for the memo..there is SO MUCH SPECULATION..just wait for it..
* and release the Dem version too, and underlying docs,even if redacted *
 
wait for the memo..there is SO MUCH SPECULATION..just wait for it..
* and release the Dem version too, and underlying docs,even if redacted *

Agreed. But what is a "Dem version?" Is this the same memo with different redactions that make the FBI look better?
 
wait for the memo..there is SO MUCH SPECULATION..just wait for it..
* and release the Dem version too, and underlying docs,even if redacted *

No speculation, everyone knows what it is and what it will say, it will imply that the FBI didn't have enough evidence to seek the intial FICA nor any renewal after that, meaning the FBI plotted to bring down Trump. The key there is imply, just enough to start the innuendos and feed the conspiracies, from there it the right wing media and President's surrogates will present it as fact, and any contrary evidence will be dismissed as fake news.

There is no suspense here, it all has been carefully orchestrated, and from the topic post, seemingly in the White House

And the Democrat revision of the memo will never official see the light of day, it will get buried in "procedural" steps
 
That libs are losing their collective minds over the release of this potentially damning memo? No, I don't think anyone is surprised. :dunno:

Nah, quite the contrary, I'm looking forward to the theater, it has all been planned to either fire the assistant AG, or Mueller, both of which will go a long way for the Democrats come November, and all the while Mueller will move forward
 
Called separation of powers, in addition, displays that the White House owns the House Committee, which wasn't begun to serve as an agency to defend the President

If what you say is true then it is ok in your mind, that the Democratic party was an agency to defend Obama instead of preventing the alleged abuses for 8 years. GOT IT!
 
I agree with Paul Ryan... transparency is a great disinfectant, that’s why the Republicans want to keep the minority report secret.
 
No speculation, everyone knows what it is and what it will say, it will imply that the FBI didn't have enough evidence to seek the intial FICA nor any renewal after that, meaning the FBI plotted to bring down Trump. The key there is imply, just enough to start the innuendos and feed the conspiracies, from there it the right wing media and President's surrogates will present it as fact, and any contrary evidence will be dismissed as fake news.

There is no suspense here, it all has been carefully orchestrated, and from the topic post, seemingly in the White House

And the Democrat revision of the memo will never official see the light of day, it will get buried in "procedural" steps
I'm sure it ( Dem version)will be leaked once the Repub memo gets released.

No there isn't just a bunch of implication/speculation, there should be some solid underlying links to facts.
The problem is the underlying docs can't be released ( my preference is release it all) -but any more info we get can be looked at and evaluated
 
Back
Top