Is Britian a real democracy?? or something else??

Bill said:
HOUSE OF LORDS, never elected, parliament for life......:| ??
Click to expand...

Ask yourself, is globalist crime organization or lobbyist dictatorship a democracy?!


like in Canada ...

unmasked-101.jpg
 
Why don't you ask that in your own thread??

My thread is about the House of Lords.. You have a comment about that?? thanks..
 
Do you have an opinion specifically on the House of Lords??


IMHO that seems rather archaic..
 
Jack said:
How can it be a real democracy if they don't have the Electoral College?
Click to expand...

They serve kinda the same purpose.. The Lords are there to look out for the Lords interest (not carrying that the peons didn't vote for them) & the Electoral is to insure against MOB RULE, aka the will of the majority...

Kinda odd that you can call the will of 63,000,000 Americans a mob, but it works for some folks rationalizations..:rolleyes:
 
Constitutional monarchy, which is certainly a type of representative democracy.

The only people I am aware of that detest democracy are Vladimir Putin, Latin American dictators, and American conservatives.
 
Great Britain must be a real Democracy or a non fascist State at apparently giving May the boot and for the most part giving tRump, his criminal family and lawless and treasonous free loading cronies the greeting they deserve as in "we despise a Russian puppet, we despise traitors, we despise a hypocrite, we despise a demagogue and we despise his fellow criminals against humanity".
 
AssHatZombie said:
the u.s. senate was actually conceived as a body to represent the state governments. kinda similar.
Click to expand...

True, but I think the Lords are there for their own interests, not the counties, municipalities etc..

Senators Elected by State Legislatures
Cartoon portraying the time it took to pass the Seventeenth Amendment allowing the direct election of U.S. senators

In 1913 the Seventeenth Amendment officially became a part of the U.S. Constitution, providing for the direct popular election of senators. This was a major departure from the plan adopted by the framers in 1787. According to Article I, Section 3 of the Constitution, “The Senate of the United States shall be composed of two Senators from each state, chosen by the legislature thereof for six Years.” The framers believed that in electing senators, state legislatures would cement their ties with the national government. They also expected that senators elected by state legislatures would be freed from pressures of public opinion and therefore better able to concentrate on legislative business and serve the needs of each state. In essence, senators would serve as “states’ ambassadors” to the federal government. Unfortunately, problems with this system soon arose, particularly when state legislators failed to agree on a Senate candidate, causing frequent Senate vacancies. By 1826 proposals for direct election of senators began appearing, but it took reformers nearly a century to achieve this constitutional change.
 
Bill said:
They serve kinda the same purpose.. The Lords are there to look out for the Lords interest (not carrying that the peons didn't vote for them) & the Electoral is to insure against MOB RULE, aka the will of the majority...

Kinda odd that you can call the will of 63,000,000 Americans a mob, but it works for some folks rationalizations..:rolleyes:
Click to expand...

The House of Lords essentially performs the same kind of function as the Senate in the United States originally did. It's original purpose was to give the States representation as States.
However, the UK is not a republic. It is an oligarchy (dictatorship by committee). There is no functional constitution of any kind in the UK.
 
Cypress said:
Constitutional monarchy, which is certainly a type of representative democracy.

The only people I am aware of that detest democracy are Vladimir Putin, Latin American dictators, and American conservatives.
Click to expand...

WRONG. A democracy is government by common vote of the people. There are no representatives in a democracy. It is mob rule. It is an unstable form of government. There are currently no democracies in the world today.
The UK is an oligarchy. It has no functioning constitution. The United States is organized as a federated republic. It is not a democracy. It has constitutions.
 
gemini104104 said:
Great Britain must be a real Democracy or a non fascist State at apparently giving May the boot and for the most part giving tRump, his criminal family and lawless and treasonous free loading cronies the greeting they deserve as in "we despise a Russian puppet, we despise traitors, we despise a hypocrite, we despise a demagogue and we despise his fellow criminals against humanity".
Click to expand...

The UK is organized as an oligarchy (dictatorship by committee).
 
Speaking of the so-called House of Lords, tRump, his Miller lap b!tch of atrocities and felonies and other vermin that exist in the White House that was built by freed and slaves of America, and yet to become occupied by deplorable and rancid vagrants who should be evicted, and for the White House to be refurbished. This includes being fumigated and purged of all the dirty spies and other vermin that resides there currently.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top