Is Obama a two bit thug or what?

Obama is a man of the people. An idol to be exalted! Obama never does any wrong! I love Best Obama! A cult of personality is only befitting our first black president and the liberator of minorities and gays!

Say. . . that almost sounds familiar. I can't quite place where. Have this fun picture, in any case. I uploaded it awhile ago and never used it.

Putin-on-a-bear_zps38723422.jpg
 
LOL. Here's the email exchange. I'd personally shit my trousers if Gene Sperling (Double-LOLers) "threatened" me in an email like this:

Bob:

I apologize for raising my voice in our conversation today. My bad. I do understand your problems with a couple of our statements in the fall — but feel on the other hand that you focus on a few specific trees that gives a very wrong perception of the forest. But perhaps we will just not see eye to eye here.

But I do truly believe you should rethink your comment about saying saying that Potus asking for revenues is moving the goal post. I know you may not believe this, but as a friend, I think you will regret staking out that claim. The idea that the sequester was to force both sides to go back to try at a big or grand barain with a mix of entitlements and revenues (even if there were serious disagreements on composition) was part of the DNA of the thing from the start. It was an accepted part of the understanding — from the start. Really. It was assumed by the Rs on the Supercommittee that came right after: it was assumed in the November-December 2012 negotiations. There may have been big disagreements over rates and ratios — but that it was supposed to be replaced by entitlements and revenues of some form is not controversial. (Indeed, the discretionary savings amount from the Boehner-Obama negotiations were locked in in BCA: the sequester was just designed to force all back to table on entitlements and revenues.)

I agree there are more than one side to our first disagreement, but again think this latter issue is diffferent. Not out to argue and argue on this latter point. Just my sincere advice. Your call obviously.

My apologies again for raising my voice on the call with you. Feel bad about that and truly apologize.

Gene



From Woodward to Sperling on Feb. 23, 2013

Gene: You do not ever have to apologize to me. You get wound up because you are making your points and you believe them. This is all part of a serious discussion. I for one welcome a little heat; there should more given the importance. I also welcome your personal advice. I am listening. I know you lived all this. My partial advantage is that I talked extensively with all involved. I am traveling and will try to reach you after 3 pm today. Best, Bob


Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2013/...ling-emails-revealed-88226.html#ixzz2MCYav3zK
 
I can't get over the "threatened" bit. Jesus Christ, Bob, did you not think the emails would become public?

And what he wrote back? I don't get it. You write someone back "you do not ever need to apologize to me" and then go on to say you totally understand, and then on top of that write "hey I enjoyed it!"? WTF?

This guy is an old drama queen.
 
And what he wrote back? I don't get it. You write someone back "you do not ever need to apologize to me" and then go on to say you totally understand, and then on top of that write "hey I enjoyed it!"? WTF?

This guy is an old drama queen.

Unless he is ragging on a conservative, then he is genius, sniff, sniff, the double standard on here stinks!
 
yeah, I think Bob is feeling a tad neglected and wanted some attention. He lost a lot of credibility with that little stunt.

Whats your point /..do you think, or would you prefer he keep emails and threats from the WH a secret ?.....thats exactly wtf is wrong with this
admin......too much is secret and Woodward has gained creds with a lot of us by exposing this underhanded bullshit from the POTUS.
 
Whats your point /..do you think, or would you prefer he keep emails and threats from the WH a secret ?.....thats exactly wtf is wrong with this
admin......too much is secret and Woodward has gained creds with a lot of us by exposing this underhanded bullshit from the POTUS.


Wow. That's . . . I don't know. Just . . . Wow.
 
And what he wrote back? I don't get it. You write someone back "you do not ever need to apologize to me" and then go on to say you totally understand, and then on top of that write "hey I enjoyed it!"? WTF?

This guy is an old drama queen.

I respect Bob Woodward, but seriously? Unless there is more to this, people in DC must have gotten thin skinned since I left.
 
Whats your point /..do you think, or would you prefer he keep emails and threats from the WH a secret ?.....thats exactly wtf is wrong with this
admin......too much is secret and Woodward has gained creds with a lot of us by exposing this underhanded bullshit from the POTUS.

So what you are saying is: You didn't actually read what was written or you just don't care what was actually said?
 
Back
Top