Is this the new weapon in the arms race?

cancel2 2022

Canceled
Lead test engineer Peter Finlay said: ‘We’re not quite at the place where the Star Trek and Star Wars movies are but this is definitely an advancement in technology able to give us an opportunity to do things we could not do before.’ James Dodd, vice-president of Advanced Boeing Military Aircraft, said there was a real need for a weapon that could knock out a target but not cause harm to people and structures.

He said: ‘We know this has capabilities and impact. We’re trying to see if we can get it implemented sooner rather than later.’
However, experts fear that the project could create an arms race, with countries scrambling to build their own electromagnetic pulse weapons.

Professor Trevor Taylor, Professorial Fellow at the Royal United Services Institute, said the Western world would be much more vulnerable to such an attack because of our increased reliance on electronics. He added: ‘This is a challenging area in political and military terms. Ideally there would have been an arms-control agreement to cover this field, because once technology is actually developed, control becomes harder.

‘The historical record shows that important technologies developed in one country are developed elsewhere within a relatively short period – look what happened with regard to the USSR and nuclear weapons. ‘Should the US be known to have developed such a technology to the production stage, it would drive others to try to act similarly. ‘Western countries are more dependent on electronics-based IT than others and would be vulnerable to extensive disruption.’


article-2241525-164DF87B000005DC-239_634x587.jpg



http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencet...itzing-drone-cripple-nations-electronics.html
 
Lead test engineer Peter Finlay said: ‘We’re not quite at the place where the Star Trek and Star Wars movies are but this is definitely an advancement in technology able to give us an opportunity to do things we could not do before.’ James Dodd, vice-president of Advanced Boeing Military Aircraft, said there was a real need for a weapon that could knock out a target but not cause harm to people and structures.

He said: ‘We know this has capabilities and impact. We’re trying to see if we can get it implemented sooner rather than later.’
However, experts fear that the project could create an arms race, with countries scrambling to build their own electromagnetic pulse weapons.

Professor Trevor Taylor, Professorial Fellow at the Royal United Services Institute, said the Western world would be much more vulnerable to such an attack because of our increased reliance on electronics. He added: ‘This is a challenging area in political and military terms. Ideally there would have been an arms-control agreement to cover this field, because once technology is actually developed, control becomes harder.

‘The historical record shows that important technologies developed in one country are developed elsewhere within a relatively short period – look what happened with regard to the USSR and nuclear weapons. ‘Should the US be known to have developed such a technology to the production stage, it would drive others to try to act similarly. ‘Western countries are more dependent on electronics-based IT than others and would be vulnerable to extensive disruption.’


article-2241525-164DF87B000005DC-239_634x587.jpg



http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencet...itzing-drone-cripple-nations-electronics.html

I suppose a bag of microwave popcorn could be used as an early warning device. :dunno: :D
 
Isn't this like the Neutron bomb or a Nuclear EMP producing weapon ?

A Neutron Bomb to kill people with little damage to buildings
Nuclear explosions produce an EMP that destroys electronic components...

I was under the impression that weapons capable of these results were already in the arsenal....weere testing them in 1962


Knocking out a target without hurting people is totally dependent on the target in essence....
 
Last edited:
Isn't this like the Neutron bomb or a Nuclear EMP producing weapon ?

A Neutron Bomb to kill people with little damage to buildings
Nuclear explosions produce an EMP that destroys electronic components...

I was under the impression that weapons capable of these results were already in the arsenal....weere testing them in 1962


Knocking out a target without hurting people is totally dependent on the target in essence....

Yup, this stuff has been around for awhile. They dont use them because the banks make a killing in reconstruction.....What I find more disturbing is the 30,000 drones the Americans have authorized to fly over the USA. They know a civilian uprising is coming due to the economic situation and they are preparing......They have made many other laws to further the police state.
 
Isn't this like the Neutron bomb or a Nuclear EMP producing weapon ?

A Neutron Bomb to kill people with little damage to buildings
Nuclear explosions produce an EMP that destroys electronic components...

I was under the impression that weapons capable of these results were already in the arsenal....weere testing them in 1962


Knocking out a target without hurting people is totally dependent on the target in essence....

This is designed to target individual buildings not a whole city and it is carried by a drone.
 
Yup, this stuff has been around for awhile. They dont use them because the banks make a killing in reconstruction.....What I find more disturbing is the 30,000 drones the Americans have authorized to fly over the USA. They know a civilian uprising is coming due to the economic situation and they are preparing......They have made many other laws to further the police state.
careful, you might be thought a lunatic soon as well. :cool:
 
What do Americans think about this? Have you guys heard about it?

http://www.naturalnews.com/034919_spy_drones_America_surveillance.html

Congress OKs 30,000 flying drones spying on Americans across U.S. cities

Thursday, February 09, 2012 by: J. D. Heyes

Now they can have targeted assassinations of political dissenters err......I mean terrorists in America.....

And why not? Obama was elected. Period. Case closed. Are the citizens supposed to be terrorized by the malcontents? By the people who believe they have no moral obligation to help others? By those who, due to luck and circumstance, believe it's fine to watch others go hungry while they enjoy the benefits the country offered? By greedy and selfish people who would see the country split and decline rather than share their bounty? By the people who encouraged youth to go to war and fight for their country while they stayed home and piled up the money and when the soldiers returned they are told to "take responsibility. Sorry, while you were gone we financially raped widows using predatory loans and bankrupted small businesses and then we bought shares of the large corporations who did that and we're sititng on a sh!tload of money and you have none. Maybe we can lower the minumum wage, build a brush factory and there will a boom in toilet cleaning jobs."

While Obama is trying to at least get medical coverage for the people the very ones who would suffer without it are yelling, "Socialist".

Political dissenters are one thing. Those who can only be described as idiots are another. When it's obvious to even a child that change is coming and a comprehensive plan has to be put in place to benefit the most there are a few who are not only dissenting but threatening violence. Their idea of liberty is to hell with the people and the country. Selfishness is an understatement. They function using only their reptilian brain devoid of empathy and compassion. They have no understanding of community and like animals they scatter and hunt alone and, eventually, are sought out and eliminated.

Of course it's nothing new. "Outlaw" is a familiar word in our language. Whether it's Bonnie and Clyde or Al Capone or Bernie Madoff or........nothing new here. Whether it's government with six-guns (Clanton Gang) or forensic accountants (Bernie Madoff) the old adage is, "They always get their man".

Like the Republican politicians and pundits who erroneously believed the public was behind them the same illusion affects those "political dissesnters". They think the public will support their cause. The problem is their cause does nothing for the general public. Their cause is to hell with the public. And their idiocy shows by them choosing this time to make a stand, a stand when more and more people realize working together is imperative during tough times. Not only are fewer and fewer people in a position to "go it alone" the immediate future is not exactly rosy.

Once, again, they're on a one way street going the wrong way.
 
Back
Top