IS Tulsi Gabbard the "ONE"?

M

montgomery

Verified User
One very smart lady and she looks good enough to make it in the mainstream too! And tonight she put Chris Matthews in his place in a gentle way. And indication that she's ready to rise above the rabble.

As Trump's people start walking away from him, they're going to be looking for a hero who at least has intentions of delivering that which Trump promised but lied about ever delivering.

Too early obviously for any real read on the lady but a trial balloon for this forum. Judging is always much easier to do by measuring the vitriol and the mewling of the rabid right. So let's see how hard they mewl and whine about Tulsi?

Or

Their trying the silent treatment on the question is just as good an indication that it's stuck up their assholes and picking at them!
 
Hard not to like her a lot.

I do.

I expect the Dems will go with a woman in its top spot again.

My guess is Tulsi Gabbard or Kirsten Gillibrand. Perhaps even Kamala Harris...although if she is the choice, I suspect it will be for the second spot.

I'd vote for any of them.
 
Gunny2009 said:
Too old and too damaged by her own stupidity.
Click to expand...

Warren is extremely bright and knowledgeable. She is a financial expert, unlike Trump. She also is a terrific senator who questions people in front of committees with a real bite to get the facts out.
 
Nordberg said:
Warren is extremely bright and knowledgeable. She is a financial expert, unlike Trump. She also is a terrific senator who questions people in front of committees with a real bite to get the facts out.
Click to expand...

No Democratic nominee over the age of 60.

Warren should be Senate Majority Leader.
 
montgomery said:
One very smart lady and she looks good enough to make it in the mainstream too! And tonight she put Chris Matthews in his place in a gentle way. And indication that she's ready to rise above the rabble.

As Trump's people start walking away from him, they're going to be looking for a hero who at least has intentions of delivering that which Trump promised but lied about ever delivering.

Too early obviously for any real read on the lady but a trial balloon for this forum. Judging is always much easier to do by measuring the vitriol and the mewling of the rabid right. So let's see how hard they mewl and whine about Tulsi?

Or

Their trying the silent treatment on the question is just as good an indication that it's stuck up their assholes and picking at them!
Click to expand...


She not bad to look at in a Bikini either ... ;)
 

DuPv2TCU0AIAvlZ.jpg
 
Looked at her positions on Wiki.
I'd consider her.
Which means she doesn't stand a chance with dims.
Front runners are still Michael Avenatti, Hillary, Al Sharpton, David Hogg, and Occasional-Cortex. :doh:
 
Nordberg said:
So Tulsi is more qualified than Elizabeth? That makes sense?
Click to expand...

We can't have a Boomer nominee. Whoever it is has gotta be Gen X.

I love Warren, but she's most effective in the Senate. I wouldn't be opposed to her as Treasury Secretary, but I think she does her best work as a Senator, and I think she'd be a better leader than Schumer.
 
Bourbon said:
She not bad to look at in a Bikini either ... ;)
Click to expand...

Personal appearance is the number 1 prerequisite of a political candidate in the US. If a great looking candidate is put up against a noticably bad looking candidate, I believe that the attribute of good looks could even surpass the importance of party affiliation!

If Tulsi Gabbard is the ONE then the Repubs will be faced with a huge deficit to begin with, unless they run her equal in personal appearance. Never Trump of course. The Hispanic guy from Florida maybe? It would at least begin with two equal dogs in the fight, so to speak.
 
You people are backing a young inexperienced candidate over a well qualified one. Trump was inexperienced and it shows.
 
Nordberg said:
What about Bernie?
Click to expand...

Bernie is too old, in my opinion. And he is known as a socialist, which is a curse to at least half the population. The Democrats need some new blood.

A lot can happen in two years. The Dick & Bush junta was in the dumpster until 9/11 took them to something over 80%, if I recall correctly.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top