APP - I've Begun the Solar Investigation

Haiku

Makes the ganglia twitch.
I want to put solar on my south facing roof and this is a pretty good article by someone who is interested in doing the same thing. We need to move over to renewable resources in this country and around the world. It's doable and Germany is a good example of what can and has been done in this area. Google it.

During the past year, southern Maryland has had several power outages, most recently one at the beginning of July which lasted 4 days. A handful of the neighbors have invested in ginormous diesel backup generators which cost $30,000 and burn 30 gal of fuel per day.

So I wondered aloud if solar couldn't be an optimal solution. And thus began my journey.

The Clift notes version goes: PV Panels go for about $1 to $1.50 per watt. Tesla makes a battery backup system. Credits and rebates are a minimum of 30% credit for all materials and labor, in addition to state rebates and energy credits. In Washington DC you could almost break even in the first year.

The first thing I noticed was that NO solar installation company posts their prices on their website. It's as frustrating as it is transparent, and probably accounts for the reason why panels cost $1 per watt but final installations go for $6 per watt. That just isn't right. Two master electricians each making $100 an hour for two days would only cost $3,200. My gut tells me this markup is because 95% of the people who start out researching this kind of project (myself included) don't have the necessary electrical knowledge to effectively comparison shop, become overwhelmed, and go with the first qualified contractor who gives us an estimate. That doesn't mean you shouldn't arm yourself with knowledge. If you want to be as hands on in the decision making process as possible, demand that you be able to separate the materials bid from the labor.

Solar panels (a.k.a. pv modules) are made up of solar cells (a.k.a. wafers) arranged in an array and encapsulated in glass. Most panel manufacturers are not cell manufacturers, the latter falling into the realm of semiconductor nano technology. Most cells are at least 14% efficient, with 19% being the new bar. Some run 30% efficient and one claims to have hit the 50% mark.

Soaring efficiency has led to plummeting prices. I don't know if this is a good place to buy solar panels, but it's a great place to shop for them. Keep in mind that in 10 years, you'll probably be able to buy twice the wattage at half the price, which is why most consumers are dragging their feet on early adoption.

Enter the credits and rebates. Until 2016, a tax credit of 30% the total cost of materials and labor is available for all residential solar installations, even those not on your primary residence.
Read the rest here.. http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/08/08/1117847/-I-ve-Begun-the-Solar-Investigation
 
I want to put solar on my south facing roof and this is a pretty good article by someone who is interested in doing the same thing. We need to move over to renewable resources in this country and around the world. It's doable and Germany is a good example of what can and has been done in this area. Google it.


Read the rest here.. http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/08/08/1117847/-I-ve-Begun-the-Solar-Investigation

That article is incorrect about PV panel efficiency. The theoretical maximum efficiency for silicon based panels is 29% so any claims above that are pure bullshit. I am also posting an article from the treehugger's bible the Guardian by George Monbiot about the experiences of the UK and Germany with solar panels. IT points out that for the individual it is a very good idea but only at the expense of other energy users.



http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/10/081023100536.htm

http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/georgemonbiot/2010/mar/11/solar-power-germany-feed-in-tariff
 
Last edited:
Back
Top