Jordan Peterson vs 20 atheist

Sammy Jankis said:
that's right.

blame the victim.

they don't pay even when they should because they rely on people not being able to afford lawyers.


you're in no way Christian.

you worship Satan.

go fuck yourself in your vile face.
Click to expand...
Be honest, it's the drugs that make you cranky, isn't it, Fredo?
 
Phantasmal said:
They’re turning on each other

theworldwatch.com

Nick Fuentes Roasts Charlie Kirk, Ben Shapiro and Jordan Peterson.. "They're Grift is Over"

Nick Fuentes states the era of the Conservative Grifter is over. Only Andrew Tate & the Groypers have the energy now. "If Ben Shapiro, Charlie Kirk & Jordan Peterson can't annihilate the SJWs anymore, then what can they do?"
theworldwatch.com theworldwatch.com
Click to expand...
Fuentes: "They're grift is over."

"They are grift is over?" :rolleyes:

I'll take Shapiro vs Fuentes in a debate, IQ test, spelling bee etc all day, every day.
 
Jordans "I live as if God exists" explanation tracked with Zen and Joseph Campbell's The Power of Myth.....it was fine.
 
Hawkeye10 said:
No......he is a dissident who has been under relentless attack for many years, and has generally handled it well.
Click to expand...
Per Merriam-Webster: Dissident - disagreeing especially with an established religious or political system, organization, or belief

Given that his video shows junior getting his butt handed to him, I would like to know from you EXACTLY what he has been disagreeing about over the years. I'll wait.
 
It's hysterical to watch all the MAGA/Alt-Right bull horns do the classic "pot calling the kettle black". They're like a bunch of crabs trying to crawl out of a bucket.
ZenMode said:
Fuentes: "They're grift is over."

"They are grift is over?" :rolleyes:

I'll take Shapiro vs Fuentes in a debate, IQ test, spelling bee etc all day, every day
Click to expand...
 
Phantasmal said:
They destroyed him and his credibility

www.newsweek.com

Testy Jordan Peterson exchange during Christianity debate viewed 3.4M times

The Canadian psychologist and author refused to say whether he was a Christian in a debate with 20 atheists.
www.newsweek.com www.newsweek.com

When a debater who introduced himself as Danny said to Peterson, "You're a Christian," Peterson answered: "You say that, I haven't claimed that."

"What is this?" Danny asked, "Christians versus atheists," referring to the title of the debate.

“While the video is now entitled Jordan Peterson vs 20 atheists, it is was originally called 1 Christian vs 20 atheists, according to an archived version of the page on WaybackMachine.”

cdn.jwplayer.com

Jordan Peterson refuses to identify as a 'Christian' in viral atheist debate

Jordan Peterson refuses to identify as a 'Christian' in viral atheist debate Jubilee
cdn.jwplayer.com
Click to expand...
Typical of Peterson. Classic 'agnostic' who is actually a Christian. No integrity.
 

Is Jordan Peterson Just Making It Up as He Goes?​

​


The incredible thing about Peterson is that, in writing and speech, he somehow manages to be both a sententious reactionary and a purveyor of postmodern gobbledygook. He is a master of faux-Confucian aphorisms—“There is no being without imperfection”—and spouts kindergarten morality with the self-serious gravitas of a bearded prophet who has just been handed stone tablets by the Almighty.

thewalrus.ca

Is Jordan Peterson Just Making It Up as He Goes? | The Walrus

The culture war’s favourite prophet can’t finish a straight thought
thewalrus.ca thewalrus.ca
 
Hume said:

Is Jordan Peterson Just Making It Up as He Goes?​

​


The incredible thing about Peterson is that, in writing and speech, he somehow manages to be both a sententious reactionary and a purveyor of postmodern gobbledygook. He is a master of faux-Confucian aphorisms—“There is no being without imperfection”—and spouts kindergarten morality with the self-serious gravitas of a bearded prophet who has just been handed stone tablets by the Almighty.

thewalrus.ca

Is Jordan Peterson Just Making It Up as He Goes? | The Walrus

The culture war’s favourite prophet can’t finish a straight thought
thewalrus.ca thewalrus.ca
Click to expand...


at a convenient remove from anything tangible or concrete.
Click to expand...
Ironic projection from the author, I failed to find an argument. It was a rhetorical fluffy way to point and say "wierdo!"


kindergarten morality
Click to expand...
I live in a society where 1/3 of people on debate sites immediately rush to tell me "there is no such thing as objective reality, truth is subjective and morality is doubly subjective".

Whatever kindergarten morality is, that would be an improvement over what people make it to adults thinking.


That Peterson is, at this point, quite obviously a charlatan is beyond dispute.
Click to expand...
Talking past each other worse than that happens on this forum daily. Dragons are imaginary manifestations of an abstraction. The end. The only reason this author is poking at this is because he WANTS Peterson to say "dragons were flesh and blood" because he/she is not an honest actor.


Q: “Do you believe in an all-knowing, all-powerful, all-good notion of God?
Peterson: “What do you mean by ‘believe’?”

Q: “Do you think it to be true?”
Peterson: “That’s a circular definition. What do you mean when you say you ‘believe’?”

Q: “How is that circular?”
Peterson: “Because you added no content to the answer by substituting the words ‘true’ and ‘believe.’”
Click to expand...
That's evasiveness, which you could argue destroys credibility; but it doesn't make him a christian. If anything it supports "lying to his christian followers by refusing to admit he doesn't believe".
 
ADreamOfLiberty said:
Ironic projection from the author, I failed to find an argument. It was a rhetorical fluffy way to point and say "wierdo!"



I live in a society where 1/3 of people on debate sites immediately rush to tell me "there is no such thing as objective reality, truth is subjective and morality is doubly subjective".

Whatever kindergarten morality is, that would be an improvement over what people make it to adults thinking.



Talking past each other worse than that happens on this forum daily. Dragons are imaginary manifestations of an abstraction. The end. The only reason this author is poking at this is because he WANTS Peterson to say "dragons were flesh and blood" because he/she is not an honest actor.



That's evasiveness, which you could argue destroys credibility; but it doesn't make him a christian. If anything it supports "lying to his christian followers by refusing to admit he doesn't believe".
Click to expand...
I never read posts with multiple responses.
 
Hume said:
I never read posts with multiple responses.
Click to expand...
uzd2Jbf.jpeg
 
Hawkeye10 said:
I dont agree with Peterson re the Zionist Bastards, and I question his relationship with Daily Wire, but I dont have any major problems with him. Re whether he is a Christian or not I have seen him talk about that a few times.....I have not seen him do it this time.....I have not been listening to him much for about a year.

People come and go on my grapevine.
Click to expand...
Taichiliberal

Post in thread 'Jordan Peterson vs 20 atheist'

He's such a pompous ass. He should have stayed in his academic/professional wheelhouse. The nano-second he starts pontificating right wing rhetoric, he's toast .... as this debate clearly shows.

The Maga mooks that actually have the mental capacity to understand the exchange will just cover their ears and bleat the SOS as they do for their Cheeto Jeezus and cohorts. Pathetic.
  • Like
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top