JPP Chickenshi...I mean Conservatives

[zappasguitar]

And just HOW scared of honest dialogue are the usual JPP conservatives/Trumpkins?

They've dedicated an entire thread to showcasing their Clinton Derangement Syndrome, but STILL just can't stand to have a dissenting opinion distract from their mastabatory Clinton hate/Trump love!

Yes indeedy, they are most definitely a brave little clutch of Trumpkins.

 

[Life is Golden]

Do any of the Progressives thread-ban others?

 

[TTQ64]

And just HOW scared of honest dialogue are the usual JPP conservatives/Trumpkins?

They've dedicated an entire thread to showcasing their Clinton Derangement Syndrome, but STILL just can't stand to have a dissenting opinion distract from their mastabatory Clinton hate/Trump love!

Yes indeedy, they are most definitely a brave little clutch of Trumpkins.

It's almost embarrassing......almost!

 

[Русский агент]

Do any of the Progressives thread-ban others?

They do, but Zappacrite won't acknowledge that fact, yet he call others cowardly.

Zappacrite also won't engage I Love America despite numerous direct challenges, yet he call others cowardly.

Zappacrite claimed that a man was a "Trumpkin" on August 24th and despite being asked for evidence, has provided none, won't admit his error, yet he call others cowardly.

Thus, ZappasGuitar + hypocrite - Guitar = Zappacrite.

 

[zappasguitar]

Do any of the Progressives thread-ban others?

Not a laundry list of posters like some of the more cowardly JPP Righties do.

 

[Русский агент]

Not a laundry list of posters like some of the more cowardly JPP Righties do.

So now, after being cornered, cowardly Zappacrite walks back his oft-proclaimed opinion that anyone who threadbans is "chickenshit".

Now, it's suddenly a question of degree.

Tell us, O wise arbiter of all forum morality, what is the acceptable number of people that can be threadbanned with out incurring the scorn of the mighty Zappacrite?

4? 5? 6?

Or will you predictably assert that it's the "motivation" that counts?

Summon your lil ho for a good fluff, Zappacrite. Do you like it when she wears her pink pussy hat?

 

[Life is Golden]

Not a laundry list of posters like some of the more cowardly JPP Righties do.

But the ones who do are just chickenshits, right?

 

[Buckly J. Ewer]

Do any of the Progressives thread-ban others?

Only redneck racists like you.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

And just HOW scared of honest dialogue are the usual JPP conservatives/Trumpkins?

They've dedicated an entire thread to showcasing their Clinton Derangement Syndrome, but STILL just can't stand to have a dissenting opinion distract from their mastabatory Clinton hate/Trump love!

Yes indeedy, they are most definitely a brave little clutch of Trumpkins.

zappa, you're like in the top 5 list of one of the LAST people to talk about any kind of derangement syndrome and dissenting opinions. really.

 

[Ralph]

And just HOW scared of honest dialogue are the usual JPP conservatives/Trumpkins?

They've dedicated an entire thread to showcasing their Clinton Derangement Syndrome, but STILL just can't stand to have a dissenting opinion distract from their mastabatory Clinton hate/Trump love!

Yes indeedy, they are most definitely a brave little clutch of Trumpkins.

Nothing bigoted going on here folks move along. LMAO You certainly are the poster child for left wing "tolerance".

 

[PostmodernProphet]

Not a laundry list of posters like some of the more cowardly JPP Righties do.

/shrugs......its just a list of folks not worth listening to.....

 

[archives]

So now, after being cornered, cowardly Zappacrite walks back his oft-proclaimed opinion that anyone who threadbans is "chickenshit".

Now, it's suddenly a question of degree.

Tell us, O wise arbiter of all forum morality, what is the acceptable number of people that can be threadbanned with out incurring the scorn of the mighty Zappacrite?

4? 5? 6?

Or will you predictably assert that it's the "motivation" that counts?

Summon your lil ho for a good fluff, Zappacrite. Do you like it when she wears her pink pussy hat?

In your case, as in many of the other banning conservatives, it is in the thirties, and I can't even recall that many left of center posters on this Forum

 

[archives]

/shrugs......its just a list of folks not worth listening to.....

Which in several conservative posters here means anyone who could possible offer an alternative view, that's not a forum but rather talk radio

 

[PostmodernProphet]

Which in several conservative posters here means anyone who could possible offer an alternative view, that's not a forum but rather talk radio

but you're on the list because you aren't worth listening to.......

 

[USFREEDOM911]

Which in several conservative posters here means anyone who could possible offer an alternative view, that's not a forum but rather talk radio

It's not the "alternative view"; but instead all the other baggage that JPP liberal snowflakes tend to include; unless you're going to try and say that such a thing never happens.

 

[Life is Golden]

Only redneck racists like you.

Sucks 2 B Bucktard.

 

[Buckly J. Ewer]

Sucks 2 B Bucktard.

It must really suck to B a redneck racist retard in an age of enlightenment...
LOL

 

[Life is Golden]

It must really suck to B a redneck racist retard in an age of enlightenment...
LOL

Sucks 2 B Bucktard.

 

[Buckly J. Ewer]

Sucks 2 B Bucktard.

Have you ever had an original thought in your entire life, redneck racist?

That was a rhetorical question BTW...

 

[Cancel 2018.2]

Didn't Zappas originally vote for the thread ban feature and recently voted to keep it?