Judge strikes down parts of the patriot act

evince

Truthmatters
http://tinyurl.com/2rr8jr

E-Mail * Comments * E-Mail Newsletters * RSS



Associated Press
Judge Strikes Down Part of Patriot Act
By LARRY NEUMEISTER 09.06.07, 10:54 AM ET

NEW YORK - A federal judge struck down parts of the revised USA Patriot Act on Thursday, saying investigators must have a court's approval before they can order Internet providers to turn over records without telling customers.

U.S. District Judge Victor Marrero said the government orders must be subject to meaningful judicial review and that the recently rewritten Patriot Act "offends the fundamental constitutional principles of checks and balances and separation of powers."

The American Civil Liberties Union had challenged the law, complaining that it allowed the FBI to demand records without the kind of court order required for other government searches.

The ACLU said it was improper to issue so-called national security letters, or NSLs - investigative tools used by the FBI to compel businesses to turn over customer information - without a judge's order or grand jury subpoena.
 
NEW YORK - A federal judge struck down parts of the revised USA Patriot Act on Thursday, saying investigators must have a court's approval before they can order Internet providers to turn over records without telling customers.

I agree 1000%!
 
http://tinyurl.com/2rr8jr

E-Mail * Comments * E-Mail Newsletters * RSS



Associated Press
Judge Strikes Down Part of Patriot Act
By LARRY NEUMEISTER 09.06.07, 10:54 AM ET

NEW YORK - A federal judge struck down parts of the revised USA Patriot Act on Thursday, saying investigators must have a court's approval before they can order Internet providers to turn over records without telling customers.

U.S. District Judge Victor Marrero said the government orders must be subject to meaningful judicial review and that the recently rewritten Patriot Act "offends the fundamental constitutional principles of checks and balances and separation of powers."

The American Civil Liberties Union had challenged the law, complaining that it allowed the FBI to demand records without the kind of court order required for other government searches.

The ACLU said it was improper to issue so-called national security letters, or NSLs - investigative tools used by the FBI to compel businesses to turn over customer information - without a judge's order or grand jury subpoena.

Alright! There is someone on the bench who understands the Constitution!
 
What do AntiAmerican turbolibs have to hide ?
That book on Kuma Sutra you checked out at the library ?
Shame on you.
 
What is wrong with Karma Sutra?

Well, you can tell by some of the positions that it was written by a man. I always like to say, ok, you try it first and after I watch you stay in that position for a half an hour, then I will try it.
 
Well, you can tell by some of the positions that it was written by a man. I always like to say, ok, you try it first and after I watch you stay in that position for a half an hour, then I will try it.

LOL, if I can hold that position for 30 minutes you will too? Well then....
 
Well, you can tell by some of the positions that it was written by a man. I always like to say, ok, you try it first and after I watch you stay in that position for a half an hour, then I will try it.

I know, you are definitely taking some big chances.
An Olympic ringnist(?) could probably pull them off...
 
NEVER! I would like to strangle him. The only animosity I have ever felt towards a TV character, well, the Tellatubbies sort of bother me!
Sort of? The way the kid would stare at the TV during teletubbies made me ban them from the house.
 
Back
Top