Karoline Leavitt Got 'Cosmetic Fillers While Pregnant?'—Social Media Throws Trump’s Bulldog Under the Bus

Number Six

Number Six

Нет, спасибо
stitchsnitches.com

Karoline Leavitt Got 'Cosmetic Fillers While Pregnant?'—Social Media Throws Trump’s Bulldog Under the Bus

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt's announcement of her second pregnancy has unexpectedly ignited a wave of online speculation and criticism,
stitchsnitches.com stitchsnitches.com

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt’s announcement of her second pregnancy has unexpectedly ignited a wave of online speculation and criticism, with social media users questioning whether she received cosmetic lip fillers while pregnant—pointing to visible marks in a recent Vanity Fair close-up portrait.

The backlash, blending health concerns with political hypocrisy accusations, highlights the intense scrutiny faced by Leavitt as a high-profile Trump administration figure.

Leavitt, 28, shared the news last week that she is expecting a baby girl in May 2026, posting ultrasound images and family photos with husband Nicholas Riccio, 60, and their 17-month-old son, Niko.

Karoline Leavitt is expecting a baby girl
Karoline Leavitt is expecting a baby girl
The announcement drew congratulations but quickly shifted focus to a Vanity Fair photoshoot from earlier in the fall, where a close-up image appeared to show injection sites around her lips.

Critics timed the pregnancy to the shoot, alleging Leavitt underwent procedures knowing she was expecting.

Did You Know?:‘A Day With Grandpa’: Karoline Leavitt, 28, Accused of Manipulating Photo to Make Her 60-Year-Old Husband Look Younger

Leavitt Faces Massive Criticism and Hypocrisy Claims

Influencer Jesus Freakin Congress posted: “If Karoline Leavitt is due in May 2026, she was already pregnant when the Vanity Fair photos were taken. Which means she appears to have gotten cosmetic fillers while pregnant. And yet, this same administration is out here warning pregnant women not to take Tylenol? So to recap: elective cosmetic injectables are apparently fine, but over-the-counter pain relief is treated like a moral hazard. Interesting…”

Liberal commentator Brian Krassenstein shared a video calling it “weird,” adding: “The crowd who doesn’t want to give newborns Hepatitis B shots are fine with putting their pregnancy in jeopardy using lip fillers.”

https://twitter.com/x/status/2004922586573266985

A user identifying as a “recovering Republican” wrote: “Karoline knew she was pregnant during that photoshoot last month. Pregnant women are NOT supposed to get lip injections yet our dumb— potus and RFK Jr. are telling them not to take Tylenol. Really?”

Anti-MAGA influencer Dittie commented: “Somebody should inform the idiot mommy-to-be that all of that filler she keeps shoving in her face is harmful to her baby. In fact, it’s even not FDA approved for pregnant women, BECAUSE IT’S POTENTIALLY HARMFUL.”

The criticism references general medical guidance cautioning against elective cosmetic procedures like dermal fillers during pregnancy due to limited safety data, though no definitive risks are established. The administration, through figures like Robert F. Kennedy Jr., has raised concerns about certain medications and vaccines.

Leavitt’s Pregnancy Announcement and What Follows

Leavitt’s post expressed gratitude for motherhood and thanked Trump and Chief of Staff Susie Wiles for a “pro-family environment.” She has balanced her demanding role with family life, previously sharing how she managed work during her first pregnancy.

The age gap with Riccio—32 years—has long drawn commentary, often resurfacing alongside personal announcements.

The controversial close-up was part of Vanity Fair’s profile on Wiles, photographed by Christopher Anderson, known for intimate portraits. Anderson defended his style as consistent across subjects, rejecting suggestions of malice.

The White House dismissed the images as intentionally unflattering.
 
AI Overview



Lip filler needle marks (tiny red spots/pinpricks) usually disappear within hours to a day, but the associated swelling and bruising peak around days 2-3 and typically resolve within
1 to 2 weeks, with significant improvement seen by day 7 as colors change from blue/purple to green/yellow. Full settling and the final result can take up to a month, but noticeable healing of marks and bruising is usually done in the first week or two.

---------------------------------------

So I am to believe that she would do this procedure right before an important photo shoot...and would fail to cover up the marks with lipstick......when optics are her job?

I tend to doubt it.
 
Maze said:
stitchsnitches.com

Karoline Leavitt Got 'Cosmetic Fillers While Pregnant?'—Social Media Throws Trump’s Bulldog Under the Bus

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt's announcement of her second pregnancy has unexpectedly ignited a wave of online speculation and criticism,
stitchsnitches.com stitchsnitches.com

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt’s announcement of her second pregnancy has unexpectedly ignited a wave of online speculation and criticism, with social media users questioning whether she received cosmetic lip fillers while pregnant—pointing to visible marks in a recent Vanity Fair close-up portrait.

The backlash, blending health concerns with political hypocrisy accusations, highlights the intense scrutiny faced by Leavitt as a high-profile Trump administration figure.

Leavitt, 28, shared the news last week that she is expecting a baby girl in May 2026, posting ultrasound images and family photos with husband Nicholas Riccio, 60, and their 17-month-old son, Niko.

Karoline Leavitt is expecting a baby girl
Karoline Leavitt is expecting a baby girl
The announcement drew congratulations but quickly shifted focus to a Vanity Fair photoshoot from earlier in the fall, where a close-up image appeared to show injection sites around her lips.

Critics timed the pregnancy to the shoot, alleging Leavitt underwent procedures knowing she was expecting.

Did You Know?:‘A Day With Grandpa’: Karoline Leavitt, 28, Accused of Manipulating Photo to Make Her 60-Year-Old Husband Look Younger

Leavitt Faces Massive Criticism and Hypocrisy Claims

Influencer Jesus Freakin Congress posted: “If Karoline Leavitt is due in May 2026, she was already pregnant when the Vanity Fair photos were taken. Which means she appears to have gotten cosmetic fillers while pregnant. And yet, this same administration is out here warning pregnant women not to take Tylenol? So to recap: elective cosmetic injectables are apparently fine, but over-the-counter pain relief is treated like a moral hazard. Interesting…”

Liberal commentator Brian Krassenstein shared a video calling it “weird,” adding: “The crowd who doesn’t want to give newborns Hepatitis B shots are fine with putting their pregnancy in jeopardy using lip fillers.”

https://twitter.com/x/status/2004922586573266985

A user identifying as a “recovering Republican” wrote: “Karoline knew she was pregnant during that photoshoot last month. Pregnant women are NOT supposed to get lip injections yet our dumb— potus and RFK Jr. are telling them not to take Tylenol. Really?”

Anti-MAGA influencer Dittie commented: “Somebody should inform the idiot mommy-to-be that all of that filler she keeps shoving in her face is harmful to her baby. In fact, it’s even not FDA approved for pregnant women, BECAUSE IT’S POTENTIALLY HARMFUL.”

The criticism references general medical guidance cautioning against elective cosmetic procedures like dermal fillers during pregnancy due to limited safety data, though no definitive risks are established. The administration, through figures like Robert F. Kennedy Jr., has raised concerns about certain medications and vaccines.

Leavitt’s Pregnancy Announcement and What Follows

Leavitt’s post expressed gratitude for motherhood and thanked Trump and Chief of Staff Susie Wiles for a “pro-family environment.” She has balanced her demanding role with family life, previously sharing how she managed work during her first pregnancy.

The age gap with Riccio—32 years—has long drawn commentary, often resurfacing alongside personal announcements.

The controversial close-up was part of Vanity Fair’s profile on Wiles, photographed by Christopher Anderson, known for intimate portraits. Anderson defended his style as consistent across subjects, rejecting suggestions of malice.

The White House dismissed the images as intentionally unflattering.
Click to expand...
No doubt Doctor RFK Jr. is advising her! :thup:
 
Maze said:
If she is 4 months along then she got the lip injections during the pregnancy like claimed.
Click to expand...
We dont know that she did, and even if she did there is no evidence that it is harmful to the baby. Telling pregnant women that they cant do things because of possible harm to the baby is a fetish.
 
Hawkeye10 said:
We dont know that she did, and even if she did there is no evidence that it is harmful to the baby. Telling pregnant women that they cant do things because of possible harm to the baby is a fetish.
Click to expand...
Ah, the classic 'I-have-no-proof-but-I'll-play-doctor-anyway' approach. Tell me, did you get your medical degree from the University of Pulled-It-Out-of-My-Ass, or are you just naturally gifted at being wrong with such confidence?
 
Maze said:
stitchsnitches.com

Karoline Leavitt Got 'Cosmetic Fillers While Pregnant?'—Social Media Throws Trump’s Bulldog Under the Bus

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt's announcement of her second pregnancy has unexpectedly ignited a wave of online speculation and criticism,
stitchsnitches.com stitchsnitches.com

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt’s announcement of her second pregnancy has unexpectedly ignited a wave of online speculation and criticism, with social media users questioning whether she received cosmetic lip fillers while pregnant—pointing to visible marks in a recent Vanity Fair close-up portrait.

The backlash, blending health concerns with political hypocrisy accusations, highlights the intense scrutiny faced by Leavitt as a high-profile Trump administration figure.

Leavitt, 28, shared the news last week that she is expecting a baby girl in May 2026, posting ultrasound images and family photos with husband Nicholas Riccio, 60, and their 17-month-old son, Niko.

Karoline Leavitt is expecting a baby girl
Karoline Leavitt is expecting a baby girl
The announcement drew congratulations but quickly shifted focus to a Vanity Fair photoshoot from earlier in the fall, where a close-up image appeared to show injection sites around her lips.

Critics timed the pregnancy to the shoot, alleging Leavitt underwent procedures knowing she was expecting.

Did You Know?:‘A Day With Grandpa’: Karoline Leavitt, 28, Accused of Manipulating Photo to Make Her 60-Year-Old Husband Look Younger

Leavitt Faces Massive Criticism and Hypocrisy Claims

Influencer Jesus Freakin Congress posted: “If Karoline Leavitt is due in May 2026, she was already pregnant when the Vanity Fair photos were taken. Which means she appears to have gotten cosmetic fillers while pregnant. And yet, this same administration is out here warning pregnant women not to take Tylenol? So to recap: elective cosmetic injectables are apparently fine, but over-the-counter pain relief is treated like a moral hazard. Interesting…”

Liberal commentator Brian Krassenstein shared a video calling it “weird,” adding: “The crowd who doesn’t want to give newborns Hepatitis B shots are fine with putting their pregnancy in jeopardy using lip fillers.”

https://twitter.com/x/status/2004922586573266985

A user identifying as a “recovering Republican” wrote: “Karoline knew she was pregnant during that photoshoot last month. Pregnant women are NOT supposed to get lip injections yet our dumb— potus and RFK Jr. are telling them not to take Tylenol. Really?”

Anti-MAGA influencer Dittie commented: “Somebody should inform the idiot mommy-to-be that all of that filler she keeps shoving in her face is harmful to her baby. In fact, it’s even not FDA approved for pregnant women, BECAUSE IT’S POTENTIALLY HARMFUL.”

The criticism references general medical guidance cautioning against elective cosmetic procedures like dermal fillers during pregnancy due to limited safety data, though no definitive risks are established. The administration, through figures like Robert F. Kennedy Jr., has raised concerns about certain medications and vaccines.

Leavitt’s Pregnancy Announcement and What Follows

Leavitt’s post expressed gratitude for motherhood and thanked Trump and Chief of Staff Susie Wiles for a “pro-family environment.” She has balanced her demanding role with family life, previously sharing how she managed work during her first pregnancy.

The age gap with Riccio—32 years—has long drawn commentary, often resurfacing alongside personal announcements.

The controversial close-up was part of Vanity Fair’s profile on Wiles, photographed by Christopher Anderson, known for intimate portraits. Anderson defended his style as consistent across subjects, rejecting suggestions of malice.

The White House dismissed the images as intentionally unflattering.
Click to expand...
Her husband is 60?

That means when he was her age her parents likely hadn't even met, lol

That's just gross.
 
Fucking Marxists - throwing a fit because a woman dares get pregnant without asking their permission.

The vermin here are melting down because she didn't abort the child. democrats mourn each and every live birth.
 
Maze said:
Ah, the classic 'I-have-no-proof-but-I'll-play-doctor-anyway' approach. Tell me, did you get your medical degree from the University of Pulled-It-Out-of-My-Ass, or are you just naturally gifted at being wrong with such confidence?
Click to expand...
If you think there is evidence that lip fillers are bad for baby you are free to present it.
 
AI Overview



No, the
off-label use of a drug is not FDA-approved. The term "off-label" specifically means that the medication is being used in a way that falls outside the uses, doses, patient populations, or administration routes explicitly approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

AI Overview



Off-label prescription drug use is very common, with estimates suggesting
around 1 in 5 (20-21%) of all prescriptions, and even higher in certain groups like children (nearly 80%) or intensive care units, often for conditions not approved by the FDA but based on clinical judgment, though much of it lacks strong evidence. This practice is legal and can be vital for unique patient needs, but carries risks like unexpected side effects, making it crucial for providers to balance benefits against risks, especially when evidence is weak.
 
There is no conclusive scientific evidence or data on how lip fillers harm a fetus because clinical studies are not ethically performed on pregnant women. As a result, the FDA has not approved the use of lip fillers during pregnancy.
Most medical professionals and health organizations strongly advise against getting lip fillers while pregnant, purely out of an abundance of caution and lack of safety data.
Potential Concerns (Primarily for the Mother)
While current evidence suggests that hyaluronic acid fillers, when injected correctly, primarily stay in the local area and are unlikely to enter the maternal bloodstream in significant amounts that could reach the fetus, potential complications for the mother can pose indirect risks.
Potential risks include:
Infection Any invasive procedure carries an infection risk, which can be more dangerous during pregnancy because the immune system is altered. Infections can potentially harm both the mother and the developing fetus.
Allergic Reactions Hormonal changes may increase the likelihood or intensity of adverse reactions (swelling, redness, bruising) to the filler ingredients or the local anesthetic (like lidocaine) often mixed with it.
Complication Management If an adverse reaction or vascular issue occurs, treating it becomes difficult because many necessary medications (e.g., specific steroids, some antibiotics, or the filler-dissolving enzyme hyaluronidase) are not well-studied or recommended for use during pregnancy.
Unpredictable Results Pregnancy causes significant fluid retention and swelling, including in the lips. This makes the results of lip fillers unpredictable and potentially unnatural-looking once postpartum swelling subsides.
Key Takeaway
Due to the lack of safety data and the "do no harm" principle, the safest approach is to postpone elective cosmetic procedures like lip fillers until after you have given birth and finished breastfeeding.
If you received lip fillers before knowing you were pregnant, do not panic, as current anecdotal evidence suggests a low risk of harm, but you must inform your OB-GYN or healthcare provider at your next visit so they can monitor your pregnancy appropriately.
 
Maze said:
There is no conclusive scientific evidence or data on how lip fillers harm a fetus because clinical studies are not ethically performed on pregnant women. As a result, the FDA has not approved the use of lip fillers during pregnancy.
Most medical professionals and health organizations strongly advise against getting lip fillers while pregnant, purely out of an abundance of caution and lack of safety data.
Potential Concerns (Primarily for the Mother)
While current evidence suggests that hyaluronic acid fillers, when injected correctly, primarily stay in the local area and are unlikely to enter the maternal bloodstream in significant amounts that could reach the fetus, potential complications for the mother can pose indirect risks.
Potential risks include:
Infection Any invasive procedure carries an infection risk, which can be more dangerous during pregnancy because the immune system is altered. Infections can potentially harm both the mother and the developing fetus.
Allergic Reactions Hormonal changes may increase the likelihood or intensity of adverse reactions (swelling, redness, bruising) to the filler ingredients or the local anesthetic (like lidocaine) often mixed with it.
Complication Management If an adverse reaction or vascular issue occurs, treating it becomes difficult because many necessary medications (e.g., specific steroids, some antibiotics, or the filler-dissolving enzyme hyaluronidase) are not well-studied or recommended for use during pregnancy.
Unpredictable Results Pregnancy causes significant fluid retention and swelling, including in the lips. This makes the results of lip fillers unpredictable and potentially unnatural-looking once postpartum swelling subsides.
Key Takeaway
Due to the lack of safety data and the "do no harm" principle, the safest approach is to postpone elective cosmetic procedures like lip fillers until after you have given birth and finished breastfeeding.
If you received lip fillers before knowing you were pregnant, do not panic, as current anecdotal evidence suggests a low risk of harm, but you must inform your OB-GYN or healthcare provider at your next visit so they can monitor your pregnancy appropriately.
Click to expand...

1766969809312.png
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top