Krugman

Cancel7

Banned
Here is a really great Krugman column, but only 1/3 of it. The entire column is at the link below. He makes such great points, and he has a tidbit in there about Hillary Clinton and Al Gore that I was unaware of.

Paul Krugman

"Rich liberals who claim they’ll help America’s less fortunate are phonies.

Let me give you one example — a Democrat who said he’d work on behalf of workers and the poor. He even said he’d take on Big Business. But the truth is that while he was saying those things, he was living in a big house and had a pretty lavish summer home too. His favorite recreation, sailing, was incredibly elitist. And he didn’t talk like a regular guy.

Clearly, this politician wasn’t authentic. His name? Franklin Delano Roosevelt.

Luckily, that’s not how the political game was played 70 years ago. F.D.R. wasn’t accused of being a phony; he was accused of being a “traitor to his class.” But today, it seems, politics is all about seeming authentic. A recent Associated Press analysis of the political scene asked: “Can you fake authenticity? Probably not, but it might be worth a try.”

What does authenticity mean? Supposedly it means not pretending to be who you aren’t. But that definition doesn’t seem to fit the way the term is actually used in political reporting.

For example, the case of F.D.R. shows that there’s nothing inauthentic, in the normal sense of the word, about calling for higher taxes on the rich while being rich yourself. If anything, it’s to your credit if you advocate policies that will hurt your own financial position. But the news media seem to find it deeply disturbing that John Edwards talks about fighting poverty while living in a big house.

On the other hand, consider the case of Fred Thompson. He spent 18 years working as a highly paid lobbyist, wore well-tailored suits and drove a black Lincoln Continental. When he ran for the Senate, however, his campaign reinvented him as a good old boy: it leased a used red pickup truck for him to drive, dressed up in jeans and a work shirt, with a can of Red Man chewing tobacco on the front seat.

http://welcome-to-pottersville.blogspot.com/2007/06/paul-krugman-authentic-never-mind.html
 
So freddy was a lobbyist for 18 years ......hmm did not know that.

Why would you know that usc? The msm never mentions it. Chris Matthews can barely control himself when he's talking about Thompson. "He's so big, and large, and commanding, and fierce...I've noticed". Yes Chris, and it's a good thing you are sitting behind that desk so we can all not notice your erection!

Something else in here that is little known, and that I didn't know. One of Hillary's major advisers on her staff also works for a company who is hired to union-bust. Al Gore fired this guy in 2000. But the talking heads are so busy speculating on how often Bill and her have sex, this is another thing that nobody knows.
 
Why would you know that usc? The msm never mentions it. Chris Matthews can barely control himself when he's talking about Thompson. "He's so big, and large, and commanding, and fierce...I've noticed". Yes Chris, and it's a good thing you are sitting behind that desk so we can all not notice your erection!

Something else in here that is little known, and that I didn't know. One of Hillary's major advisers on her staff also works for a company who is hired to union-bust. Al Gore fired this guy in 2000. But the talking heads are so busy speculating on how often Bill and her have sex, this is another thing that nobody knows.
Oh Please... They chose Denver and a venue that is seriously anti-union over a city with a stadium fully staffed by union reps. Unions are fools if they think the D Party has any real love for them other than their secksi phone banks...

They squeeze the banks and dream about votes, then when it comes time to commit they just leave them sitting there saying, "Why did they do that?"
 
Oh Please... They chose Denver and a venue that is seriously anti-union over a city with a stadium fully staffed by union reps. Unions are fools if they think the D Party has any real love for them other than their secksi phone banks...

They squeeze the banks and dream about votes, then when it comes time to commit they just leave them sitting there saying, "Why did they do that?"

Damo, don't act like the Democrats are monolithic.

"her chief strategist heads a public relations company that helps corporations fight union organizing drives."

I'm sure that all Democrats have someone like that on their campaigns, and so high up too. She is DLC. Big business Democrat. There are other kinds of Dems who are friendly to unions.
 
Damo, don't act like the Democrats are monolithic.

"her chief strategist heads a public relations company that helps corporations fight union organizing drives."

I'm sure that all Democrats have someone like that on their campaigns, and so high up too. She is DLC. Big business Democrat. There are other kinds of Dems who are friendly to unions.
LOL. My descriptions were fun. I enjoyed it.

The D Party as a whole chose that venue, not the HillBilly Campaign.
 
I highly doubt the choice had anything to do with unions though.
No, but it did ignore them. The union that was broken by the addition of the chosen venue begged them to reconsider, they ignored them and rejected the city with the union.

And you know what? I bet those phone banks will be all hot and secksi anyway...
 
Oh Please... They chose Denver and a venue that is seriously anti-union over a city with a stadium fully staffed by union reps. Unions are fools if they think the D Party has any real love for them other than their secksi phone banks...

They squeeze the banks and dream about votes, then when it comes time to commit they just leave them sitting there saying, "Why did they do that?"


the primary reason they chose Denver, is because the rocky mountain west is fast becoming blue territory. Not because they hate unions. It's all about realpolitik and pragmatic strategy.

The rocky mountain west is fertile Democratic territory, in the presidential electoral calculus for Dems.
 
the primary reason they chose Denver, is because the rocky mountain west is fast becoming blue territory. Not because they hate unions. It's all about realpolitik and pragmatic strategy.

The rocky mountain west is fertile Democratic territory, in the presidential electoral calculus for Dems.
But at the same time they get to screw the union.

Let me see. Reagan's amnesty kills Chavez' union. Which one are they after with this one?

Seriously, I'm not saying they "hate" unions, just that they aren't particularly focused on them. Unions believe that they have support, they are one of the "sure" groups you can ignore and still get their vote.

As I said, they love them when they are setting up their secksi phone banks, and pretty much ignore them otherwise, unless it really doesn't take much effort.
 
But at the same time they get to screw the union.

Let me see. Reagan's amnesty kills Chavez' union. Which one are they after with this one?

Seriously, I'm not saying they "hate" unions, just that they aren't particularly focused on them. Unions believe that they have support, they are one of the "sure" groups you can ignore and still get their vote.

As I said, they love them when they are setting up their secksi phone banks, and pretty much ignore them otherwise, unless it really doesn't take much effort.

"But at the same time they get to screw the union."


WIKI: "The head of the International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employes Local No. 7, Jim Taylor, has refused to sign a no-strike agreement for the convention. The Pepsi Center normally uses non-union labor, but will use Taylor's union during the convention, and Taylor wants the Pepsi Center to use his union for all events."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2008_Democratic_National_Convention#Labor_issues
 
"But at the same time they get to screw the union."


WIKI: "The head of the International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employes Local No. 7, Jim Taylor, has refused to sign a no-strike agreement for the convention. The Pepsi Center normally uses non-union labor, but will use Taylor's union during the convention, and Taylor wants the Pepsi Center to use his union for all events."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2008_Democratic_National_Convention#Labor_issues
LOL. Seriously, the Pepsi Center is owned by the Walmart family, the union in Denver was killed, and they are not using a Union. Seriously, you should verify everything in Wiki before posting it as fact.

There is story after story of angry ex-union members pissed at the party for ignoring them going on locally here.

I'm telling you, they are not using union labor at the Pepsi Center during this convention, the Union was shut out.
 
Damo is correct.

They WERE going to use the union for the event... but this changed their minds....

"The head of the International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employes Local No. 7, Jim Taylor, has refused to sign a no-strike agreement for the convention. "
 
We're still two years away sfreak. I read they are still trying to iron out the union issue. Prior to the convention in two years.


The important thing is this: The road to a permanent democratic majority runs through the Mountain West.
 
Cypress....

1) I seriously doubt there will EVER be a "permanent majority" for EITHER party. Just not going to happen.

2) I did not say they could not change their minds on the union. I think they would go with the union in a heartbeat if the union signs the no-strike clause. Otherwise, I don't see it happening.
 
As for the mountain west.... you put up national leaders going forward the likes of Clark, Richardson, Lieberman, or our own Salazar and you stand to gain a much longer tenure in control than you do putting up the likes of Hitlary, Munster and Bore.
 
As for the mountain west.... you put up national leaders going forward the likes of Clark, Richardson, Lieberman, or our own Salazar and you stand to gain a much longer tenure in control than you do putting up the likes of Hitlary, Munster and Bore.

I've been extremely impressed by Clark from the first time he declared. I haven't heard that he might be willing to run again, but I agree with you that he would probably be a far better president than anyone so far who has jumped into the contest.
 
Back
Top