Leftist hypocrisy on Elon Musk's policy shifts is so amusing, isn't it?

Diogenes

Gravitic propulsion systems powered aircraft
f961cdd9-fcc5-43e6-8602-7f56abf78f6e.jpg


"Twitter is a private company and can do what it wants" reflects a narrative that was particularly prominent during discussions about Twitter's content moderation policies, especially around the time of high-profile account suspensions like that of former President Donald Trump.

This perspective was used by some to argue that Twitter, as a private entity, had the right to set and enforce its own rules regarding speech on its platform, without interference, due to the First Amendment not applying to private companies.

But now, this narrative has shifted.

Once Elon Musk acquired Twitter, some of the same leftists who previously proclaimed Twitter's autonomy as a private company began expressing concerns.

This shift has been interpreted by some as a reflection of ideological alignment rather than a consistent principle about private companies' rights over content moderation.

The fact remains that:
  • Legally, Twitter, like any private company, can establish its terms of service at any time and enforce them, though it must still comply with various laws.

@Grok
 
A regular laff riot:



iu
 
Elon's restricting responses to his posts to only the people who pay for the blue check?

I wonder what part of FREE SPEECH Elon is confused by? Apparently it's the "free" bit. LOL.

(And before you whine: Yes I know Elon is running a private business and "freedom of speech " is not applicable to it, but it IS something he sold the yokels on X being.)
 
Elon's restricting responses to his posts to only the people who pay for the blue check? I wonder what part of FREE SPEECH Elon is confused by? Apparently it's the "free" bit. LOL. (And before you whine: Yes I know Elon is running a private business and "freedom of speech " is not applicable to it, but it IS something he sold the yokels on X being.)


"Twitter is a private company and can do what it wants"....

Paid access is a thing. Try reading "member's content only" on any website without paying.

Try the failing New York Times.

Try the washed-up Washington Post.

Try the left-leaning Times of London.

You can't comment on their sites unless you meet their criteria.

Freedom of speech is not the same as freedom of reach.

You can post what you like on 𝕏. It's just not going to be promoted by the algorithm.

Cope.
 
"Twitter is a private company and can do what it wants"....

Paid access is a thing. Try reading "member's content only" on any website without paying.

Try the failing New York Times.

Try the washed-up Washington Post.

Try the left-leaning Times of London.

You can't comment on their sites unless you meet their criteria.

Freedom of speech is not the same as freedom of reach.

You can post what you like on 𝕏. It's just not going to be promoted by the algorithm.

Cope.

I love how you just skipped right over the bit in my post that addressed this point directly.

Did you feel the need to say something when nothing was needed to be said? LOL. Needin' attention now?
 
Back
Top