Lefty Gun Threshold

Evmetro

New member
I see a lot of lefties here who feel that there is a connection between availability of guns and shooting deaths. I would like to know just how many guns would need to fall into the hands of one of you lefties to make you shoot somebody. Would being able to freely cross a state line with a gun be the last straw before you just had to go find a school? I do not understand the lefty concept of how the type and quantity of guns people have causes them to shoot somebody, so it would really help if some of you guys would define the threshold where the gun compels the person to shoot.
 
This is really tricky. If Americans were not allowed to have guns, would we have less gun deaths. Think about it. Why, we would have zero. Amazing logic isn't it. Countries that don't allow the masses to have guns don't have many gun deaths. Logic is pretty tough for rightys.
 
This is really tricky. If Americans were not allowed to have guns, would we have less gun deaths. Think about it. Why, we would have zero. Amazing logic isn't it. Countries that don't allow the masses to have guns don't have many gun deaths. Logic is pretty tough for rightys.

And how would you go about collecting the 350 million guns now in the hands of private citizens? And how would you get around the Constitution to do it?
 
This is really tricky. If Americans were not allowed to have guns, would we have less gun deaths. Think about it. Why, we would have zero. Amazing logic isn't it. Countries that don't allow the masses to have guns don't have many gun deaths. Logic is pretty tough for rightys.

Based on what you call logic, if we made a law where people were told not to murder, there would be zero murders. If we made a law where people were told not to steal from others, there would be no theft. Maybe that's what we should do. Wait, we have done that.

If you don't thing someone should own guns, get off your leftist ass and try to take them. Wait, that would be stealing on your part and we have laws against that, therefore, according to your logic stealing won't take place.
 
This is really tricky. If Americans were not allowed to have guns, would we have less gun deaths. Think about it. Why, we would have zero. Amazing logic isn't it. Countries that don't allow the masses to have guns don't have many gun deaths. Logic is pretty tough for rightys.

so you're saying that the left doesn't really give a fuck about rape, robbery, and murder when it's done with any other weapon, just get rid of guns. it's almost like they are quietly advocating for might makes right.
 
This is really tricky. If Americans were not allowed to have guns, would we have less gun deaths. Think about it. Why, we would have zero. Amazing logic isn't it. Countries that don't allow the masses to have guns don't have many gun deaths. Logic is pretty tough for rightys.

Why do you feel the need to differentiate gun deaths from others? Is it more acceptable to be stabbed than shot?
 
I see a lot of lefties here who feel that there is a connection between availability of guns and shooting deaths. I would like to know just how many guns would need to fall into the hands of one of you lefties to make you shoot somebody. Would being able to freely cross a state line with a gun be the last straw before you just had to go find a school? I do not understand the lefty concept of how the type and quantity of guns people have causes them to shoot somebody, so it would really help if some of you guys would define the threshold where the gun compels the person to shoot.

One (1)

BTW, are all the "lefties" you know anti-gun?

Just curious, I haven't come across one in any of my circles.
 
This is really tricky. If Americans were not allowed to have guns, would we have less gun deaths. Think about it. Why, we would have zero. Amazing logic isn't it. Countries that don't allow the masses to have guns don't have many gun deaths. Logic is pretty tough for rightys.

Americans are not allowed to have heroin. Are there zero deaths from heroin?

Logic seems to be tough for you.
 
So you say. Can you think of any reason I should believe you?


Don't get me wrong, there's Law that says you have to believe me.

BTW, just got my Stainless Kimber Pro Carry II yesterday to join the family of Fire Arms.

Now it could be a Lie, but I wouldn't let that unlocked door and welcome mat fool yea ... :clink:
 
I see a lot of lefties here who feel that there is a connection between availability of guns and shooting deaths. I would like to know just how many guns would need to fall into the hands of one of you lefties to make you shoot somebody. Would being able to freely cross a state line with a gun be the last straw before you just had to go find a school? I do not understand the lefty concept of how the type and quantity of guns people have causes them to shoot somebody, so it would really help if some of you guys would define the threshold where the gun compels the person to shoot.

Facts are difficult for you, aren't they?
 
I'll let you answer it yourself, you stupid fuck.

Differentiate 58 killed and 550 injured in a 10 minute period.

1) Gun
2) Knife

Fucking idiot barrel-stroker.

so you're confirming that you don't care about people dying, just how they're being killed. thanks. all you had to say.
 
I see a lot of lefties here who feel that there is a connection between availability of guns and shooting deaths. I would like to know just how many guns would need to fall into the hands of one of you lefties to make you shoot somebody. Would being able to freely cross a state line with a gun be the last straw before you just had to go find a school? I do not understand the lefty concept of how the type and quantity of guns people have causes them to shoot somebody, so it would really help if some of you guys would define the threshold where the gun compels the person to shoot.

mentally ill people with access to guns



why do you think its a great idea?
 
Back
Top