liberal media bias is real

translation....i lied and only i debunked it.....

you falsely made it sound as if its debunking was common knowledge and absolutely accepted...you're full of shit, your debunking is worthless
 
I have seen both sides of the great American divide blame the press or, as some of them prefer to label it, the main stream media.
The truth is that news reporting has changed so much since the introduction of the internet that no conclusion regarding bias can possibly be made. Every blogger now has as much chance of his story being read as the most respected hack.
The onus has now swung to the shoulders of the reader. If one says that news reporting is biased it simply means that they havent read sufficiently. Where the right wing is concerned they have done as well as their mental capacity allows.
 
Yurt said:
translation....i lied and only i debunked it.....

you falsely made it sound as if its debunking was common knowledge and absolutely accepted...you're full of shit, your debunking is worthless
Click to expand...


Sorry, but i wasn't the only one who debunked this study, but that is irrelevant. You apparently don't understand that factual premises plus valid logic leads to the truth, and requires no appeal to authority. The argument stands or falls on its own merit or lack thereof, and that study does not stand on its own. Its very premise is invalid. The study found Matt Drudge to be liberal and the ACLU was not. How much more evidence do you need that this "study" was bogus? If you insist on more, go to Google and type in "UCLA study of media bias debunked."

If you have a problem with the rules of logic, don't bitch to me. I didn't make them up.

Aristotle did.
 
zoombwaz said:
Sorry, but i wasn't the only one who debunked this study, but that is irrelevant. You apparently don't understand that factual premises plus valid logic leads to the truth, and requires no appeal to authority. The argument stands or falls on its own merit or lack thereof, and that study does not stand on its own. Its very premise is invalid. The study found Matt Drudge to be liberal and the ACLU was not. How much more evidence do you need that this "study" was bogus? If you insist on more, go to Google and type in "UCLA study of media bias debunked."

If you have a problem with the rules of logic, don't bitch to me. I didn't make them up.

Aristotle did.
Click to expand...

^lol^

did you actually type it in....there is zero debunking, just a few LEFT wing media sites "claiming" to debunk it....

thank for the morning chuckle
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top