Liberal Tactics.....Watch and Learn Dumb Democrats....

CanadianKid

New member
Well Desh, Cypress, Tianabuttugly, Darla, and all the other Democratic apologists..... This is how you fight against the Republican machine....

Not whine and cry and make up conspiracy theories like Desh.... You play hardball....Democrats only strategy is never missing an opportunity to lose an election....


This is how liberals fight back against the Republican bullshit....

Let's have some fun in Michigan
by kos

Thu Jan 10, 2008 at 01:31:01 PM PST
In 1972, Republican voters in Michigan decided to make a little mischief, crossing over to vote in the open Democratic primary and voting for segregationist Democrat George Wallace, seriously embarrassing the state's Democrats. In fact, a third of the voters (PDF) in the Democratic primary were Republican crossover votes. In 1988, Republican voters again crossed over, helping Jesse Jackson win the Democratic primary, helping rack up big margins for Jackson in Republican precincts. (Michigan Republicans can clearly be counted on to practice the worst of racial politics.) In 1998, Republicans helped Jack Kevorkian's lawyer -- quack Geoffrey Feiger -- win his Democratic primary, thus guaranteeing their hold on the governor's mansion that year.

With a history of meddling in our primaries, why don't we try and return the favor. Next Tuesday, January 15th, Michigan will hold its primary. Michigan Democrats should vote for Mitt Romney, because if Mitt wins, Democrats win. How so?

For Michigan Democrats, the Democratic primary is meaningless since the DNC stripped the state of all its delegates (at least temporarily) for violating party rules. Hillary Clinton is alone on the ballot.

But on the GOP side, this primary will be fiercely contested. John McCain is currently enjoying the afterglow of media love since his New Hamsphire victory, while Iowa winner Mike Huckabee is poised to do well in South Carolina.

Meanwhile, poor Mitt Romney, who’s suffered back-to-back losses in the last week, desperately needs to win Michigan in order to keep his campaign afloat. Bottom line, if Romney loses Michigan, he's out. If he wins, he stays in.

And we want Romney in, because the more Republican candidates we have fighting it out, trashing each other with negative ads and spending tons of money, the better it is for us. We want Mitt to stay in the race, and to do that, we need him to win in Michigan.

Two polls the last couple of days show a tight race: Strategic Vision (R) shows Romney within striking distance with 20 percent to McCain's 29 (Huckabee is third with 18), while Rossman Group shows Huckabee with the lead -- 23 percent to Romney's 22 and McCain's 18.

Now here's the thing -- without a real Democratic contest on the ballot, and a lack of party registration in Michigan, this is an open primary. Anyone can pick up a Republican ballot. So Michigan Democrats and independents who want to see the Republican battle royale continue should just take a few minutes on Tuesday, January 15th to cast a ballot for Mitt Romney in the Republican primary.

If you know someone in Michigan, send them the email I've included below the fold. If you don't know someone in Michigan, send the email to your liberal friends and see if THEY have friends in Michigan. Get the word out, whether by blog, mailing list, MySpace or Facebook page, or whatever.

If we can help push Mitt over the line, not only do we help keep their field fragmented, but we also pollute Romney's victory. How "legitimate" will the Mittster's victory look if liberals provide the margin of victory? Think of the hilarity that will ensue. We'll simply be adding fuel to their civil war, never a bad thing from our vantage point.

Michigan Democrats helped deliver their state to McCain in 2000 to spite their hated governor, John Engler, who had "guaranteed" his state to Bush. To prevent such future mischief, Michigan Republicans helped push through a unified tax-payer funded primary date to supposedly keep Democrats focused on their own race (prior to this year, party contests were funded by the parties). Let's make sure their meddling with the Democratic primary and their misuse of taxpayer funds backfires on them.

Michigan is Romney’s last stand. He has pulled all advertising from other states for a last-ditch effort there. It’s sink or swim time for Romney, and we’re going to throw him a lifesaver.

So why are we doing this? Because we can. Because it'll be fun. And because we've suffered Republican meddling, stealing, and disenfranchisement in our elections for far too long.

So get the word out and get out the vote!.
 
While Rome burns Democrats play musical chairs....

Democrats like to bring waterguns to a shootout....No wonder Republicans always win the elections....

CK
 
Edwards the dumbass telling his supporters to write Uncommited in the Democratic Primary.....to embarass Hillary....

Why doesnt he do something productive like try and fuck up the Republicans.....

God Democrats are stupid...

CK
 
Compared to where Huckabee was 1 month ago....

he is doing amazingly well....Even his national numbers are right up there....

CK
 
The idea isn't necessarily to have Romney beat McCain overall (although that is preferable), but to prolong the campaign, the infighting, the spending and the negative attacks.
Prolonging the pimary doesn't hurt the GOP, as the candiates need to get their message out anyway. Regards to spending, on average Americans spend the equivalent of a McDonald's Happy Meal on Presidential campaigns.
 
Edwards the dumbass telling his supporters to write Uncommited in the Democratic Primary.....to embarass Hillary....

Why doesnt he do something productive like try and fuck up the Republicans.....

God Democrats are stupid...

CK

They think emotionally, not stategically.
 
Prolonging the pimary doesn't hurt the GOP, as the candiates need to get their message out anyway. Regards to spending, on average Americans spend the equivalent of a McDonald's Happy Meal on Presidential campaigns.


No, it doesn't hurt the GOP, but it hurts the eventual nominee. The primaries, wherein potential candidates of the same party fight each other often using negative attacks, are harmful to the candidate than manages to make it out as the nominee.

Additionally, what the fuck is that Happy Meal nonsense? I think you miss the point here as well. Primaries force candidates to spend money to make it to the general that may otherwise have been spent in the general. Additionally, candidates may tap out donors on primary campaign expenditures that would otherwise have contributed to the general election fund.
 
No, it doesn't hurt the GOP, but it hurts the eventual nominee. The primaries, wherein potential candidates of the same party fight each other often using negative attacks, are harmful to the candidate than manages to make it out as the nominee.

Additionally, what the fuck is that Happy Meal nonsense? I think you miss the point here as well. Primaries force candidates to spend money to make it to the general that may otherwise have been spent in the general. Additionally, candidates may tap out donors on primary campaign expenditures that would otherwise have contributed to the general election fund.


I don't agree with either point.

1. negative attacks during the primary will vet out the potentail mine fields. Better to deal with the bad issues early on then at the last minute. Remember Gore's last minute attacks on Bush in 2000? I don't reacll the exact issue (maybe drunk driving as a kid?), but when Kerry drug that up it was brushed off as old news.

2. Campaigns are mainly name recognition and have you been personally contacted. Efforts spent during the primary feed directly into the general. And contact by a GOP opponent will carry over to the eventual primary winner to a certain extent.
 
I don't agree with either point.

1. negative attacks during the primary will vet out the potentail mine fields. Better to deal with the bad issues early on then at the last minute. Remember Gore's last minute attacks on Bush in 2000? I don't reacll the exact issue (maybe drunk driving as a kid?), but when Kerry drug that up it was brushed off as old news.

2. Campaigns are mainly name recognition and have you been personally contacted. Efforts spent during the primary feed directly into the general. And contact by a GOP opponent will carry over to the eventual primary winner to a certain extent.

I really can’t stand republicans, this guy is just another example of why.
Kerry didn’t “attack” him. Bush desperately tried to keep his youthful drunk driving bust under cover, but it finally surfaced. If he wasn’t such a shit face liar, it would have come out much earlier.
And by the way dickwad, maybe you think a 30 year old is a “kid”, but very few people agree.

And that’s how old the “kid” was when he was popped. And, let’s put to rest another republican lie right here before someone tries to bring it up. Regardless of what paid bush liar Karen Hughes tried to peddle to the press, and they actually swallowed it without bothering to check, the 30 year old kid wasn’t pulled over for cautiously “driving too slow”…the drunken fool hit a tree.

Think of all the kids who would be alive today if he had just hit a little bit harder huh?
 
I really can’t stand republicans, this guy is just another example of why.
Kerry didn’t “attack” him. Bush desperately tried to keep his youthful drunk driving bust under cover, but it finally surfaced. If he wasn’t such a shit face liar, it would have come out much earlier.
And by the way dickwad, maybe you think a 30 year old is a “kid”, but very few people agree.

And that’s how old the “kid” was when he was popped. And, let’s put to rest another republican lie right here before someone tries to bring it up. Regardless of what paid bush liar Karen Hughes tried to peddle to the press, and they actually swallowed it without bothering to check, the 30 year old kid wasn’t pulled over for cautiously “driving too slow”…the drunken fool hit a tree.

Think of all the kids who would be alive today if he had just hit a little bit harder huh?

Tim Russert asks Hillary a simple question in a primary debate and she's "attacked", but Kerry exposes an unfortunate incident that Bush was involved with 25 years prior 4 days before election day and its not an attack. :)

No a 30 year old is not a kid. As I said before I did not recall the details of the incident.
 
Tim Russert asks Hillary a simple question in a primary debate and she's "attacked", but Kerry exposes an unfortunate incident that Bush was involved with 25 years prior 4 days before election day and its not an attack. :)

No a 30 year old is not a kid. As I said before I did not recall the details of the incident.


I think you meant Gore, but even then you are way off base. I'd enlighten you to how the story came out but I bet you just don't give a shit.
 
Tim Russert asks Hillary a simple question in a primary debate and she's "attacked", but Kerry exposes an unfortunate incident that Bush was involved with 25 years prior 4 days before election day and its not an attack. :)

No a 30 year old is not a kid. As I said before I did not recall the details of the incident.


He got drunk, drove his car off the road, and into a tree.

Which is kind of a metaphor for how he's led the country.
 
Back
Top