Liberalism Without Illusions

[T. A. Gardner]

"if all else fails, punch him in the balls" is a call for violence. The UK law is clear.

So, you're fine with someone in the US saying something like that flippantly and ending up in prison hum? That's what's happening in the UK.

 

[AProudLefty]

So, you're fine with someone in the US saying something like that flippantly and ending up in prison hum? That's what's happening in the UK.

There are laws against threatening and encouraging violence in the US.

 

[T. A. Gardner]

There are laws against threatening and encouraging violence in the US.

They require more than just talking shit. In the UK smack and shit talk gets you arrested.

 

[LichGold]

There are laws against threatening and encouraging violence in the US.

This extreme? No there isn't.

 

[AProudLefty]

There are laws against threatening and encouraging violence in the US.

They require more than just talking shit. In the UK smack and shit talk gets you arrested.

Give examples. Make sure to include the entire tweets, not edited.

 

[AProudLefty]

They require more than just talking shit. In the UK smack and shit talk gets you arrested.

BTW J. K. Rowling hasn't been arrested.

 

[LichGold]

BTW J. K. Rowling hasn't been arrested.

Why would she be? All she said were eunuchs are not something new just because they're gender confused and that transies are a mental disorder.

 

[AProudLefty]

Why would she be? All she said were eunuchs are nothing new just be ause they're gender confused

She hasn't called for violence against the transgender people.

 

[LichGold]

She hasn't called for violence against the transgender people.

Yes but that's only because you can't punch a eunuch in the nuts.

 

[T. A. Gardner]

BTW J. K. Rowling hasn't been arrested.

I never said she has been.

 

[AProudLefty]

I never said she has been.

According to your narrative, she would have been arrested.

 

[LichGold]

According to your narrative, she would have been arrested.

For? Offending eunuchs cant be considered dangerous in a nation with virtually no weapons rights. And don't think there weren't even one knife attack about it. You need the admission of guilt that the offended persons are unhinged dirt farmers that you are personally responsable for being present.

 

[AProudLefty]

For? Offending eunuchs cant be considered dangerous in a nation with virtually no weapons rights.

She didn't threaten or encourage violence against transgender people.

 

[LichGold]

She didn't threaten or encourage violence against transgender people.

And don't think there weren't even one knife attack about it. You need the admission of guilt that the offended persons are unhinged dirt farmers for whom you are personally responsable for being present.

False equivalency fallacy

 

[AProudLefty]

And don't think there weren't even one knife attack about it. You need the admission of guilt that the offended persons are unhinged dirt farmers for whom you are personally responsable for being present.

False equivalency fallacy

@Into the Night, this is an example of random post.

 

[LichGold]

@Into the Night, this is an example of random post.

Into the night doesn't give the basic courtesy in discourse to show basis for citing a fallacy. It's your own fault you let him post like that. He's example of nothing.