Fake News Warning. The give away is the lack of links for an outrageous story.
The Finnish Supreme Court declined to hear a case of a migrant accused of aggravated rape... so we really don't have a smoking gun of what the Finnish Supreme Court considers... (The US Supreme Court would have done exactly the same thing, because of double-jeopardy.)
The migrant was convicted of rape (statutory, not aggravated), and that conviction stands, so the Finnish legal system does in fact consider sexual abuse of a 10-year-old to be rape.
If you're not happy with the verdict, then demand the lawmakers, not the courts, strengthen rape laws. In fact, the US needs to return to stricter laws against crime, including liberal use of the rope.
Supreme Court denies appeal in sexual abuse of 10-year-old
Finland’s Supreme Court ruled that the appropriate charge was aggravated sexual abuse rather than rape...
Denying an appeal is not ruling on a case.
And, everything else I pointed out still stands.
Fake News Warning. The give away is the lack of links for an outrageous story.
Fake News Warning. The give away is the lack of links for an outrageous story.
The Finnish Supreme Court declined to hear a case of a migrant accused of aggravated rape... so we really don't have a smoking gun of what the Finnish Supreme Court considers... (The US Supreme Court would have done exactly the same thing, because of double-jeopardy.)
The migrant was convicted of rape (statutory, not aggravated), and that conviction stands, so the Finnish legal system does in fact consider sexual abuse of a 10-year-old to be rape.
If you're not happy with the verdict, then demand the lawmakers, not the courts, strengthen rape laws. In fact, the US needs to return to stricter laws against crime, including liberal use of the rope.
Desperate little twat has to resort to lies and half-truths from FINLAND, no less. What a fucking joke!
If I'd said it was "ruling on a case", you'd have a point. Since I didn't, you don't.