Libertarianism, the evil and degenerate socialist doctrine

MarcusA

Verified User
Libertarianism is an evil and degenerate socialist doctrine, which presumes that all men (and women) should have equal rights under the law, just because they exist.

Such a thing is entirely degenerate and an anathema to those with power, and attempts to subordinate those of superior traits and qualities, whether virility, intellect, charmisa, or other superior traits to the same level of those of inferior genetics, birth, character, and so forth.

For example, as someone with a post-Mensa level intelect, and in the top 1 percentile in terms of linguistc ability, it is my natural right to dominate and subordinate those of inferior intellectual and linguistic ability, such as would be the right of me and others in a proper fascist system of government, I should have and should be naturally bestowed more rights simply because I exist in a superior state of being than intellectual inferiors or other varities of defective, of whom a 1,000 could be thrown in a concentration camp, and it would still be less of a loss than the death of just 1 superior man or woman.

Hence is why the degenerate, socialist doctrine of libertarianism, which denies the will to power of the strong, the intellectual, the virile to naturally crush, dominate, and govern the weak and inferior by the force of might alone, is a cancer upon any society which values fascism, nationalism, and merit over liberal or 'progressive' notions of "equality" and should be stamped out.
 
Libertarianism is an evil and degenerate socialist doctrine, which presumes that all men (and women) should have equal rights under the law, just because they exist.

Such a thing is entirely degenerate and an anathema to those with power, and attempts to subordinate those of superior traits and qualities, whether virility, intellect, charmisa, or other superior traits to the same level of those of inferior genetics, birth, character, and so forth.

For example, as someone with a post-Mensa level intelect, and in the top 1 percentile in terms of linguistc ability, it is my natural right to dominate and subordinate those of inferior intellectual and linguistic ability, such as would be the right of me and others in a proper fascist system of government, I should have and should be naturally bestowed more rights simply because I exist in a superior state of being than intellectual inferiors or other varities of defective, of whom a 1,000 could be thrown in a concentration camp, and it would still be less of a loss than the death of just 1 superior man or woman.

Hence is why the degenerate, socialist doctrine of libertarianism, which denies the will to power of the strong, the intellectual, the virile to naturally crush, dominate, and govern the weak and inferior by the force of might alone, is a cancer upon any society which values fascism, nationalism, and merit over liberal or 'progressive' notions of "equality" and should be stamped out.

you're so lost. let go and let god.
 
Libertarianism is an evil and degenerate socialist doctrine, which presumes that all men (and women) should have equal rights under the law, just because they exist.

Such a thing is entirely degenerate and an anathema to those with power, and attempts to subordinate those of superior traits and qualities, whether virility, intellect, charmisa, or other superior traits to the same level of those of inferior genetics, birth, character, and so forth.

For example, as someone with a post-Mensa level intelect, and in the top 1 percentile in terms of linguistc ability, it is my natural right to dominate and subordinate those of inferior intellectual and linguistic ability, such as would be the right of me and others in a proper fascist system of government, I should have and should be naturally bestowed more rights simply because I exist in a superior state of being than intellectual inferiors or other varities of defective, of whom a 1,000 could be thrown in a concentration camp, and it would still be less of a loss than the death of just 1 superior man or woman.

Hence is why the degenerate, socialist doctrine of libertarianism, which denies the will to power of the strong, the intellectual, the virile to naturally crush, dominate, and govern the weak and inferior by the force of might alone, is a cancer upon any society which values fascism, nationalism, and merit over liberal or 'progressive' notions of "equality" and should be stamped out.

Marcus: "Libertarianism is an evil and degenerate socialist doctrine, which presumes that all men (and women) should have equal rights under the law, just because they exist."
Jack: 'One Law' for everyone is pretty well established. Left, Right or in the Middle. Maybe you are confused?

Marcus: "Such a thing is entirely degenerate and an anathema to those with power, and attempts to subordinate those of superior traits and qualities, whether virility, intellect, charmisa, or other superior traits to the same level of those of inferior genetics, birth, character, and so forth."
Jack: Are you trying to discuss a 'Meritocracy'?

Marcus: "For example, as someone with a post-Mensa level intelect, and in the top 1 percentile in terms of linguistc ability, it is my natural right to dominate and subordinate those of inferior intellectual and linguistic ability, such as would be the right of me and others in a proper fascist system of government, I should have and should be naturally bestowed more rights simply because I exist in a superior state of being than intellectual inferiors or other varities of defective, of whom a 1,000 could be thrown in a concentration camp, and it would still be less of a loss than the death of just 1 superior man or woman."
Jack: Maybe you could bring this to the attention of the Moderators? I'm sure they would be impressed with your superior mind. (?) Possibly setting up a separate 'Forum' for the 'Superior Intellects' amongst us?

Marcus: "Hence is why the degenerate, socialist doctrine of libertarianism, which denies the will to power of the strong, the intellectual, the virile to naturally crush, dominate, and govern the weak and inferior by the force of might alone, is a cancer upon any society which values fascism, nationalism, and merit over liberal or 'progressive' notions of "equality" and should be stamped out.'
Jack: Mmmmmm ... this looks like an excuse. No offense, but this looks like you are trying to blame 'Libertarianism' for your inability to move out of your mom's house, find a job, and get a girlfriend.

Also ... try learning what words actually mean:

"Libertarianism is a political philosophy and movement that upholds liberty as a core principle. Libertarians seek to maximize political freedom and autonomy, emphasizing individualism, freedom of choice and voluntary association. Wikipedia"
 
"The Following User Groans At Jack For This Awful Post:
MarcusA (Today)"

Don't 'Groan' me, Marcus.
 
Stay tuned for a sneak preview of the next exciting thread title!

Anarchy, the evil and degenerate socialist doctrine
Anarchy based on the notion of individual "rights" is degenerate and socialist.

Anarchy based on "survival of the fittest", or the strong being allowed to naturally dominate and crush the weak and defective without being burdened by degenerate, liberal laws, rights, protection, and so forth is conductive to the fascist cause.
 
Anarchy based on the notion of individual "rights" is degenerate and socialist.

Anarchy based on "survival of the fittest", or the strong being allowed to naturally dominate and crush the weak and defective without being burdened by degenerate, liberal laws, rights, protection, and so forth is conductive to the fascist cause.

Anarchy is neither liberal, fascist, or socialist.
 
Libertarianism is an evil and degenerate socialist doctrine, which presumes that all men (and women) should have equal rights under the law, just because they exist.

Such a thing is entirely degenerate and an anathema to those with power, and attempts to subordinate those of superior traits and qualities, whether virility, intellect, charmisa, or other superior traits to the same level of those of inferior genetics, birth, character, and so forth.

For example, as someone with a post-Mensa level intelect, and in the top 1 percentile in terms of linguistc ability, it is my natural right to dominate and subordinate those of inferior intellectual and linguistic ability, such as would be the right of me and others in a proper fascist system of government, I should have and should be naturally bestowed more rights simply because I exist in a superior state of being than intellectual inferiors or other varities of defective, of whom a 1,000 could be thrown in a concentration camp, and it would still be less of a loss than the death of just 1 superior man or woman.

Hence is why the degenerate, socialist doctrine of libertarianism, which denies the will to power of the strong, the intellectual, the virile to naturally crush, dominate, and govern the weak and inferior by the force of might alone, is a cancer upon any society which values fascism, nationalism, and merit over liberal or 'progressive' notions of "equality" and should be stamped out.

You're "post-MENSA" eh? Someday you might wanna get around to providing some proof.
 
I've had many interesting discussions with people who promote anarchist societies.
 
It doesn't sound at all good on the surface, but, the discussions often are interesting. Home, WA was a pretty interesting case study.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Home,_Washington

That's pretty interesting. Thanks for the link. You should have read what those anarchists I've talked to.

For example, police? That's an individual business competing with others. It's a person's choice, not the government.
 
That's pretty interesting. Thanks for the link. You should have read what those anarchists I've talked to.

For example, police? That's an individual business competing with others. It's a person's choice, not the government.

Police are a function of government, as is "corrections." There should never be privatised police forces or prisons, as the function of both is to uphold order and civilized society. Private security has an actual commercial purpose.
 
Police are a function of government, as is "corrections." There should never be privatised police forces or prisons, as the function of both is to uphold order and civilized society. Private security has an actual commercial purpose.

I get it. But like I said, I understand the concept. Which is why I think it wouldn't work because of retarded people. It isn't a Star Trek world yet.
 
I get it. But like I said, I understand the concept. Which is why I think it wouldn't work because of retarded people. It isn't a Star Trek world yet.

Home, WA assumed that everything could be reduced to contracts. Interestingly, that is a somewhat classically liberal view, but, the role of government to enforce contracts is very much recognized. Home never could reconcile that problem.
 
It does sound good on the surface. But the problem is there are too many dumb and low IQ folks.

The problem is that everyone who ever talked to me about anarchy dropped out of community college because solving for X and English paper certifications were too hard for them.
 
The problem is that everyone who ever talked to me about anarchy dropped out of community college because solving for X and English paper certifications were too hard for them.

LOL. I know those types of people. I've talked with people who supported Castro and Che and wore those t-shirts. One guy in particular I've talked to said he'd be a president of a country like Castro. I laughed so hard and told him good luck because he'd be assassinated.

He wasn't even close to the same league. :laugh:
 
"The Following User Groans At Jack For This Awful Post:
MarcusA (Today)"

Don't 'Groan' me, Marcus.
I’d like to thank and groan this post simultaneously but the site won’t let me. Guess I need to take this up with grind in the complaint dept.:|
 
Back
Top