Libya Did Not Pose Threat to U.S., Was Not 'Vital National Interest' to Intervene

Cancel 2018. 3

<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
Defense Secretary: Libya Did Not Pose Threat to U.S., Was Not 'Vital National Interest' to Intervene

Secretary of Defense Robert Gates said that Libya did not pose a threat to the United States before the U.S. began its military campaign against the North African country.

On “This Week,” ABC News’ Senior White House Correspondent Jake Tapper asked Gates, “Do you think Libya posed an actual or imminent threat to the United States?”

“No, no,” Gates said in a joint appearance with Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. “It was not -- it was not a vital national interest to the United States, but it was an interest and it was an interest for all of the reasons Secretary Clinton talked about. The engagement of the Arabs, the engagement of the Europeans, the general humanitarian question that was at stake,” he said.

...

During his campaign for the Presidency, in December, 2007, Barack Obama told The Boston Globe that “The President does not have power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation.”

Earlier in 2007, then-Senator Hillary Clinton said in a speech on the Senate floor that, “If the administration believes that any -- any -- use of force against Iran is necessary, the President must come to Congress to seek that authority.”

Tapper asked Clinton, “Why not got to Congress?”

“Well, we would welcome congressional support,” the Secretary said, “but I don't think that this kind of internationally authorized intervention where we are one of a number of countries participating to enforce a humanitarian mission is the kind of unilateral action that either I or President Obama was speaking of several years ago.”

http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalp...not-vital-national-interest-to-intervene.html

:rolleyes: why do liberals like hillary think others are so stupid they would believe her line of meadowmuffins? oh wait, people voted in obama :D
 
One has to wonder if they did it as a humanitarian mission, why not go the Ivory Coast, which is in the middle of a civil unrest that has claimed hundreds of lives and displaced 1 million people.
 
Joe Biden, 2007:

“I have written an extensive legal memorandum with the help of a group of legal scholars who are sort of a stable of people, the best-known constitutional scholars in America, because for 17 years I was chairman of the Judiciary Committee. I asked them to put together [for] me a draft, which I'm now literally riding between towns editing, that I want to make clear and submit to the United States Senate pointing out the president has no authority to unilaterally attack Iran. And I want to make it clear, I want it on the record … if he does, as chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee and former chair of the Judiciary Committee, I will move to impeach him. I think the best deterrent is for the president to know, even at the end of his term, we would move and move to follow through with that so his legacy would be marred for all time if he acted in what was clearly, clearly an impeachable offense.”
 
Is this the kind of thread you construe as "supporting" the U.S. involvement in Libya?

is it a thread that is not supporting? give it up you little liar. the other day you asked me for my stance, i gave it to you and now you're running around the board lying about what i said.

you're truly pathetic. you're beyond pathological....
 
is it a thread that is not supporting? give it up you little liar. the other day you asked me for my stance, i gave it to you and now you're running around the board lying about what i said.

you're truly pathetic. you're beyond pathological....

Show me the threads you have started in "support" or the Libyan effort. There have certainly been plenty calling people "apologists" for doing so, or for not opposing Libya "enough".

You know I'm right; that's why you're getting so shrill already. You're flat-out busted on this one....
 
nope, you made the claim, you find one post, just one onceler, where i am against or opposed to libya. you're so desperate to defend your lie you claimed this thread was a thread that did not support libya....which is a complete farce. i've gone on record saying i support the action, however, obama's handling of it seems to be troubling. you, however, have to lie in order to gain points with your liberal buddies....its pathetic.

now what are you going do? i'm sure you will still continue the lie that i am opposed to it.....:rolleyes:
 
Does having supported the invasion and occupation of Iraq preclude protesting the current intervention in Libya?
 
nope, you made the claim, you find one post, just one onceler, where i am against or opposed to libya. you're so desperate to defend your lie you claimed this thread was a thread that did not support libya....which is a complete farce. i've gone on record saying i support the action, however, obama's handling of it seems to be troubling. you, however, have to lie in order to gain points with your liberal buddies....its pathetic.

now what are you going do? i'm sure you will still continue the lie that i am opposed to it.....:rolleyes:

What are you talking about? This post, and the one in the "whatever goes" section, are exactly the kind of posts I'd start about Iraq. Because I opposed it.

If you support Libya, how are you expressing that? By calling anyone who doesn't oppose it with enough passion an "Obama apologist"?

LOL - you know you're busted. You'll just do your usual pathological thing now....
 
amazing...i expressly say AGAIN that i support it...and onceler of course says i'm opposed to it...

still can't find a single post where i'm opposed huh onceler.....you're a joke....you're also lying about WHY i call you and others obama apologists...you claim you're opposed to the action in libya, yet in every post you talk about it, you DEFEND obama at each and every turn. its amazing how you "claim" to be opposed to the action, yet you vigoriously defend obama on libya
 
amazing...i expressly say AGAIN that i support it...and onceler of course says i'm opposed to it...

still can't find a single post where i'm opposed huh onceler.....you're a joke....you're also lying about WHY i call you and others obama apologists...you claim you're opposed to the action in libya, yet in every post you talk about it, you DEFEND obama at each and every turn. its amazing how you "claim" to be opposed to the action, yet you vigoriously defend obama on libya

I predicted you'd kick in w/ your pathological thing, and you don't disappoint. That's pretty much a lie - I barely mention Obama in the posts I've made on this. I have taken more issue w/ the linear comparision posters like you & SF have made.

But you know what I'm saying is right. You have lefties pegged as apologists for not opposing Libya "enough." Meanwhile, you're a koolaid-guzzling hack for Bush on Iraq, and you roam the board starting threads like this one & the one on "whatever goes." If we're not opposing Libya "enough," you sure ain't supporting it "enough," or in a way that is overt at all.

What a colossal hypocrite. It's enjoyable to bust you in a way that is so indisputable, that really challenges your pathology...
 
Back
Top