Life in Bush Economy (part 2 - no talk about median, back to economics)

ib1yysguy

Junior Member
Some facts about Bush's economy:

1) More than half of the tax breaks Bush gave in 2003 went to people making $1 million or more. The idea was that this would "trickle" down. You'll see shortly why that clearly hasn't happened.

2) Friday's jobs report was pretty damn bad. We've added eight million jobs since the bush tax cuts, which sounds good until you remember that much of that was just making up for job losses under Bush (he's the only president since Hoover to end his term with less jobs than he started with) and that Clinton added 21 million jobs after raising taxes on the rich, not lowering them.

3) Four years of the Bush economy have done just about nothing for the average joe. Wages, adjusted for inflation, have stagnated: the real hourly earnings of nonsupervisory workers, the most widely used measure of how typical workers are faring, were no higher in July 2007 than they were in July 2003.

4) Along with employment disappearing, so too did health coverage decline early in the Bush administration. So loss of benefits and stagnant wages.

5) Housing market, one of the Bush economy's few bright spots, turned out to be a house of cards.

6) 66 percent of Americans rate the economy as fair or poor.

At the same time:

7) Corporate profits rose from 2003 to 2007.

8) Real income of the 0.1 percent of richest Americans rose 51 percent between 2003 and 2005, with no data available for 2006.


How much more evidence does one need to know that "trickle down" really is "voodoo" economics? Rising tides haven't raised boats for most people. It's drowned a few, in fact.

The "Bush Boom" has ended. Time to pick up the mess.

(facts contained within were pulled from a NY Times op ed this morning)
 
Some facts about Bush's economy:

1) More than half of the tax breaks Bush gave in 2003 went to people making $1 million or more. The idea was that this would "trickle" down. You'll see shortly why that clearly hasn't happened.

2) Friday's jobs report was pretty damn bad. We've added eight million jobs since the bush tax cuts, which sounds good until you remember that much of that was just making up for job losses under Bush (he's the only president since Hoover to end his term with less jobs than he started with) and that Clinton added 21 million jobs after raising taxes on the rich, not lowering them.

3) Four years of the Bush economy have done just about nothing for the average joe. Wages, adjusted for inflation, have stagnated: the real hourly earnings of nonsupervisory workers, the most widely used measure of how typical workers are faring, were no higher in July 2007 than they were in July 2003.

4) Along with employment disappearing, so too did health coverage decline early in the Bush administration. So loss of benefits and stagnant wages.

5) Housing market, one of the Bush economy's few bright spots, turned out to be a house of cards.

6) 66 percent of Americans rate the economy as fair or poor.

At the same time:

7) Corporate profits rose from 2003 to 2007.

8) Real income of the 0.1 percent of richest Americans rose 51 percent between 2003 and 2005, with no data available for 2006.


How much more evidence does one need to know that "trickle down" really is "voodoo" economics? Rising tides haven't raised boats for most people. It's drowned a few, in fact.

The "Bush Boom" has ended. Time to pick up the mess.

(facts contained within were pulled from a NY Times op ed this morning)


Do not read this as defense of what is said.. but rather adding info that seems to be excluded:

1) The rich pay well over 50% of the taxes. As well as the rich typically have investment taxes as well.

2)You cannot tack the tech bubble popping lost jobs from on Bushs back alone. Actually most of us in finance thought after that bubble and then 9/11 that it would take 10plus years (people were thinking 70’s) to bounce back and it took much less. Also Clinton did not add jobs. High tech companies added jobs. Lets at least be honest with each other here.

3) This market has been very hard for the middle class. The key to this statement is “adjusted for inflation” energy costs have all but made annual salary increases null. We need to address this with more reusable energy, conservation, and a concerted green effort otherwise this will continue.. right on thru Hillaries presidency and we can bitch that Hillaries economy is even worse then bushs when oil is $180 a barrel in 8years.

4) This is based on a variety of things. Its not a cut or dry universal health care solution. In fact universal coverage tax increases would devastate the middle class unless they can somehow get the corporations to foot some of the bill as they do now with private group plans.

5) So the runaway tech economy of the 90’s was sound economic policy for Clinton.. but the runaway housing of the 00’s was voodoo economics? Credit has been a growing concern since we went off the gold standard and is a separate concern.

6) I would say fair for the average person. Tho personally has been ridiculously good for me.

7) O.K.? Any your point? We are taking in 2.4Trillion in taxes thanks to that.

8) Takes money to make money.. this has been the case for longer then America has been around.


How much more evidence does one need to know that "trickle down" really is "voodoo" economics? Rising tides haven't raised boats for most people. It's drowned a few, in fact.

The "Bush Boom" has ended. Time to pick up the mess.

LOL – and what is the alternative? Socialized medicine? 70% taxes on the rich? Stifling corporate taxes that basically moves companies off our soil?

Do you not realize we are in a global market? Make it unfriendly tax wise and they get up and move out.
 
Back
Top