Communists love Democrats. The Chinese people hate the American people.
Move the cursor to 29:50 and listen to Dana Perino mention the Hong Kong protesters before she goes on to say she would like to see more Americans supporting more human Rights for the Chinese People.
VIDEO ▼
https://video.foxnews.com/v/6149849844001?playlist_id=5528578293001#sp=show-clips
Frankly, I would like to see more American journalists supporting limited government instead of democracy in Hong Kong.
Just once I would to like to hear a Television Mouth say ‘Democrats and the Chinese Communists have been engaging in a love affair that began in the FDR years.’ The illicit affair was blessed by the United Nations in 1945 —— after FDR was dead. A cynic might even call the love affair a conspiracy.
There is no conspiracy in one truth. Chicoms have every reason to love Americans, while the Chinese people have every reason to hate Americans. In simple terms, it was FDR’s China hands that gave the Chinese people to the Communists in 1949? Add that blunder on top of Americans cashing in on European imperialism in China:
QUESTION: What would China be today had Americans began working to help the Chinese people establish a limited government a century ago? I cannot offer a complete answer to my question, but I do know that China would not be in the hands of Communists today.
If today’s China is of any interest to you, read and analyze the information in this article before you believe anything Television Mouths say about China:
Bottom line: The Chinese people might not like Communism, while they sure as hell will support Peking in a shooting war before they do anything to help the people that throw-in with Chicoms in the first place.
Finally, put the Korean War (25 June 1950 – 27 July 1953) in perspective. Communists took power in China on 1 October 1949. The time line tells me that most of FDR’s China hands were still dictating China policy. Indeed, the originals are long gone only to be replaced by carbon copies.
p.s. President Truman’s stated reason for firing General MacArthur was a doublespeak masterpiece. “Limit” meant Peace Without Victory:
https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...-You-Professor-Williams&p=3227492#post3227492
Move the cursor to 29:50 and listen to Dana Perino mention the Hong Kong protesters before she goes on to say she would like to see more Americans supporting more human Rights for the Chinese People.
VIDEO ▼
https://video.foxnews.com/v/6149849844001?playlist_id=5528578293001#sp=show-clips
Frankly, I would like to see more American journalists supporting limited government instead of democracy in Hong Kong.
Just once I would to like to hear a Television Mouth say ‘Democrats and the Chinese Communists have been engaging in a love affair that began in the FDR years.’ The illicit affair was blessed by the United Nations in 1945 —— after FDR was dead. A cynic might even call the love affair a conspiracy.
There is no conspiracy in one truth. Chicoms have every reason to love Americans, while the Chinese people have every reason to hate Americans. In simple terms, it was FDR’s China hands that gave the Chinese people to the Communists in 1949? Add that blunder on top of Americans cashing in on European imperialism in China:
Foreign imperialism in China
https://alphahistory.com/chineserevolution/foreign-imperialism-in-china/
https://alphahistory.com/chineserevolution/foreign-imperialism-in-china/
QUESTION: What would China be today had Americans began working to help the Chinese people establish a limited government a century ago? I cannot offer a complete answer to my question, but I do know that China would not be in the hands of Communists today.
If today’s China is of any interest to you, read and analyze the information in this article before you believe anything Television Mouths say about China:
How China Was 'Lost'
by Arthur Waldron
January 28, 2013 12:00 AM
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/weekly-standard/how-china-was-lost
by Arthur Waldron
January 28, 2013 12:00 AM
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/weekly-standard/how-china-was-lost
Bottom line: The Chinese people might not like Communism, while they sure as hell will support Peking in a shooting war before they do anything to help the people that throw-in with Chicoms in the first place.
Finally, put the Korean War (25 June 1950 – 27 July 1953) in perspective. Communists took power in China on 1 October 1949. The time line tells me that most of FDR’s China hands were still dictating China policy. Indeed, the originals are long gone only to be replaced by carbon copies.
p.s. President Truman’s stated reason for firing General MacArthur was a doublespeak masterpiece. “Limit” meant Peace Without Victory:
In April 1951, President Truman fired MacArthur and replaced him with Gen. Matthew Ridgeway. On April 11, Truman addressed the nation and explained his actions. He began by defending his overall policy in Korea, declaring, “It is right for us to be in Korea.” He excoriated the “communists in the Kremlin [who] are engaged in a monstrous conspiracy to stamp out freedom all over the world.” Nevertheless, he explained, it “would be wrong—tragically wrong—for us to take the initiative in extending the war… Our aim is to avoid the spread of the conflict.” The president continued, “I believe that we must try to limit the war to Korea for these vital reasons: To make sure that the precious lives of our fighting men are not wasted; to see that the security of our country and the free world is not needlessly jeopardized; and to prevent a third world war.” General MacArthur had been fired “so that there would be no doubt or confusion as to the real purpose and aim of our policy.”
https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/truman-relieves-macarthur-of-duties-in-korea
https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/truman-relieves-macarthur-of-duties-in-korea
The real reason President Truman fired General MacArthur was because Communist China was not a member of the United Nations. Mac wanted to cross the Yalu River and bomb Communist China. That would have amounted to the infant United Nations declaring war on China before the Chicoms were admitted to the U.N.
Peace Without Victory was always the Democrat Party’s policy. Truman was right about going to Korea, but he never should have involved the United Nations.
General MacArthur was correct in light of what China is today. As it turned out U.N.-lovers got away with calling the Korean War a Police Action so they did not have to get a declaration of war from Congress. (WWII was the last time Congress issued a declaration of war despite the wars this country fought for democracy since 1945.)
Peace Without Victory was always the Democrat Party’s policy. Truman was right about going to Korea, but he never should have involved the United Nations.
General MacArthur was correct in light of what China is today. As it turned out U.N.-lovers got away with calling the Korean War a Police Action so they did not have to get a declaration of war from Congress. (WWII was the last time Congress issued a declaration of war despite the wars this country fought for democracy since 1945.)
https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...-You-Professor-Williams&p=3227492#post3227492