Lyin' Ryan and multimillionaire Mittzie fail first joint fact-check

[Guns Guns Guns]

​

Not all the rhetoric fit neatly with reality or with the record when Romney introduced his Republican vice presidential choice to the nation Saturday.

A look at some of the claims by the Wisconsin congressman and Romney, and how they compare with the facts.

ROMNEY: "Unlike the current president, who has cut Medicare funding by $700 billion, we will preserve and protect Medicare and Social Security and keep them there for future generations."



THE FACTS: You could fill an arena with all the details left out in this statement.

Ryan's reputation as a fiscal conservative is built on a budget plan that would overhaul the Medicare program and introduce a voucher-like plan that future retirees could use to buy private health insurance.

Whether that results in a better or worse situation for Medicare recipients is a matter of debate.

But under Ryan's plan, traditional Medicare would no longer be the health insurance mainstay, just one of many competing options.

The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimates the Ryan plan — which Romney endorsed in broad strokes in the past — would slow the increases in money for seniors.

A typical 66-year-old would receive about 35 percent more than last year — $7,400 in 2011 dollars.

Under current law, that person would probably receive at least 56 percent more in 2030, and quite possibly 75 percent more — $9,600 in 2011 dollars.

The CBO said his plan grows spending for Medicare enrollees "at a much slower rate" than under current law or other policy scenarios.

In Washington, a slower increase in spending is tantamount to a spending cut.


http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-250_162...ims-when-mitt-romney-introduces-running-mate/

 

[Howey]

Isn't it funny how the guy who took advantage of Social Security now wants to dismantle it?

 

[Guns Guns Guns]

Romney's assertion that the team would preserve Social Security left out the fact that he proposes significant change.

He would protect the status quo for people 55 and over but, for the next generations of retirees, raise the retirement age for full benefits by one or two years and reduce inflation increases in benefits for wealthier recipients.

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-250_162...ims-when-mitt-romney-introduces-running-mate/

 

[Howey]

Why do the wealthy need Medicare and Social Security? I thought dicksee said they barter for that stuff?

 

[Guns Guns Guns]

RYAN on Romney: "As governor of Massachusetts, he worked with Democrats and Republicans to balance budgets with no tax increases, lower unemployment, increase income and improve people's lives."

THE FACTS: For a Massachusetts governor, balancing a budget is a requirement of state law.

Ryan's claim that Romney didn't raise taxes to comply with Massachusetts' yearly balanced budget requirement is also misleading.

While Romney didn't raise state income or sales taxes, he worked with the state's Democratic-controlled legislature to raise hundreds of millions of dollars through new or raised fees on marriage licenses, gun licenses and much more.

Romney also closed what he called business tax "loopholes," raising between $350 million and $375 million annually for three years.

Many in the Massachusetts business community said they saw the maneuver as a tax increase by a different name.

And while Romney himself didn't raise income taxes, he benefited from a huge $1.1 billion tax hike passed by Democrats the year before he took office.

It was responsible for roughly half of the deficit Romney helped cut in his first year in office.



http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-250_162...ims-when-mitt-romney-introduces-running-mate/