Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
This case fails under Brandenburg as it is currently viewed. Certainly puts to the test peoples views of free speech though.
yep...bolded it in post 15
great minds think alike

This case fails under Brandenburg as it is currently viewed. Certainly puts to the test peoples views of free speech though.
This case fails under Brandenburg as it is currently viewed. Certainly puts to the test peoples views of free speech though.
fixed that for you.
I have no argument against you here.
I think my hang-up here is the way the sheriff in my neighboring county is going after this guy. It seems like he is campaigning for political office as opposed to prosecuting the law. If he were simply prosecuting the law, I would not have so much of a problem with this. Hey, you break the law then you do the time. But, I swear this sheriff seems to be campaigning for Attorney General of the U.S. at the moment.
It appears, that it can be said that this book verges (remember I have not actually read the book) on child porn which is a crime. And if it does, then fine prosecute him, but damnit don't seek to further your political career while doing so.
Immie
HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA
I have now reduced STY to being even a bigger troll, then he already was.
I LOVE IT; because it continues to prove my point that he's an idiot.
HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA
HEY STY; hurry up and change this one, also.
![]()
you're the other side of taichiliberal, aren't you? totally oblivious and ignorant.
so very sad.
HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA
You just can't stand it, that I've exposed you as nothing more then just a big ole crybaby.
HA HA HA HA HA HA HA
The more I think this over...
Years ago I read Lolita and although the "ick" factor was present, it didn't bother me the same way this book does, should say the idea of this book, because I haven't read it either.
Maybe it's the idea of fiction vs. non-fiction?
I agree with you about the sheriff using the book to further his political career. There's an "ick" factor in that as well.
interesting points, i saw the movie and i think the difference here is age and method....this book is about manipulating very young children and their families so that you can force yourself upon small children and get away with it...has nothing to do with mutual love/lust (assumption of the movie) of a 14 year old girl who as the book says, initiated or made advances to him as well....
this book is clearly about getting away with molesting very young children and how to avoid capture
you wish.
would it then be safe to say that if I wrote a book about how to manufacture an automatic seer for an AR15, that I should be arrested?
no. like i said earlier, this is going to boil down to obscenity issues and whether the writings encourages or incites such action....if your writings sought to encourage or incite murder, then it would be a different story.
ok, focus on the obscenity issue then. Here is my problem with this case.
the 'author' lives in colorado, but the polk county florida sheriff is the one that arrested him AFTER polk county deputies ordered and payed for the book to be mailed to them. how is the 'author' supposed to know what a community considers obscene and what is not?
Big difference here. For one, it is possible to legally own a full auto AR15 if one jumps through the right hoops and pays our beloved government for the privilege of exercising an enumerated constitutional right. Therefore, such instructions are not necessarily enticing or instigating illegal activity. Likewise, the anarchist's bible only tells how to build explosive devices, but does NOT, in any way, advocate using them in terrorist or any other illegal activities.would it then be safe to say that if I wrote a book about how to manufacture an automatic seer for an AR15, that I should be arrested?
is is? whats the cite on that?its a national standard.
further, if you do business in a certain jurisdiction, it is up to you know the laws of said jurisdiction. its works the same both in civil law and criminal law.
is is? whats the cite on that?
what law in polk county describes what is obscene?
and lets not go near the 'ignorance of the law is no excuse' thing, especially when it doesn't apply to cops.
interesting points, i saw the movie and i think the difference here is age and method....this book is about manipulating very young children and their families so that you can force yourself upon small children and get away with it...has nothing to do with mutual love/lust (assumption of the movie) of a 14 year old girl who as the book says, initiated or made advances to him as well....
this book is clearly about getting away with molesting very young children and how to avoid capture
miller v. california...3 prong test, with the ultimate factor being a national standard
i believe they cited a local statute for what is obscene, and as i talked about in post 15, if the local ordinance is challegned it will fall under brandenburg v. ohio....