No, but I'm hoping Ingenuity flies as advertised.
Same here. I think it will. With 1/3 gravity and how light Ingenuity is, it will at least lift off with ease.
No doubt NASA has done their math about flight physics on Mars, but shit happens. The Mars Polar Mission failed due an engineering failure AKA math/coding failure.
https://www.space.com/10930-mars-landings-red-planet-exploration.html
Mars Polar Lander
https://www.space.com/1153-mars-polar-lander-clues-crash-site.html
Flaw in the code
"The lander was as robust as we could make it. But it was very lightweight...a rather delicate structure," Jolly told SPACE.com. "So most of us don't believe that, if it plummeted that far, it would be able to do anything...certainly not be able to call home."
Jolly envisions that the Mars Polar Lander's wire harnesses and boxes of electronics and equipment couldn't stand up to the g-forces from a harder-than-planned landing. The probe's legs would have likely crushed too.
"The whole thing would essentially implode on itself when it hit," Jolly said.
As for the cause of the crash, the investigation's findings are reasonable, Jolly said.
"That's because we know there's a known flaw in the [software] code that we found," Jolly advised. "That is why we have such a high confidence that the real cause was found...and we are moving on to correct that for future landers."
What if they find out that the real cause is an actual bug?
I remember something about moths being attracted to all of the vacuum tubes and causing shorts.