Master of death Bill Gates

Yakuda

Verified User
Bill Gates has long been a proponent of population control. Below is an article that tries to defend Bill Gates bloodlust for killing people. The article was written to "fact check" a claim that billy boy wants to use vaccines to reduce the population. The essential part of the Ted talk gates gave is this:

“The world today has 6.8 billion people. That’s headed up to about nine billion. Now, if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by, perhaps, 10 or 15 percent. But there, we see an increase of about 1.3.”

Now the counter claim in defense of Darth Gates is that the words were taken out of context. Isn't that always the way. They claim he was talking about reducing population to reduce the carbon footprint but didn't want to use vaccines to do it even though that's what he said. So their argument is it's out of context therefore it's misleading. But is it?

He clearly wants to rescue the population. That doesnt appear to be in dispute. A side question I have is why do we give a shit what a computer programmer wants in regards to the world population?

So he wants the population lowered. That's a given. Only a moron could disagree. So with that as a backdrop when he says "...if we do a really great job on new vaccines...". What should we suspect a "really great job" means to someone who wants the population reduced? Don't vaccines supposedly save lives? Oh that's right the old definition of vaccine no longer applies. Vaccines no longer need to be effective at preventing the spread of a disease.

Why Would a person who wants to reduce the population want a vaccine that would help people live longer?

https://newschecker.in/fact-check/bill-gates-2010-ted-talk-on-vaccines
 
Last edited:
Bill Gates has long been a proponent of population control. Below is an article that tries to defend Bill Gates bloodlust for killing people. The article was written to "fact check" a claim that billy boy wants to use vaccines to reduce the population. The essential part of the Ted talk gates gave is this:

“The world today has 6.8 billion people. That’s headed up to about nine billion. Now, if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by, perhaps, 10 or 15 percent. But there, we see an increase of about 1.3.”

Now the counter claim in defense of Darth Gates is that the words were taken out of context. Isn't that always the way. They claim he was talking about reducing population to reduce the carbon footprint but didn't want to use vaccines to do it even though that's what he said. So their argument is it's out of context therefore it's misleading. But is it?

He clearly wants to rescue the population. That doesnt appear to be in dispute. A side question I have is why do we give a shit what a computer programmer wants in regards to the world population?

So he wants the population lowered. That's a given. Only a moron could disagree. So with that as a backdrop when he says "...if we do a really great job on new vaccines...". What should we suspect a "really great job" means to someone who wants the population reduced? Don't vaccines supposedly save lives? Oh that's right the old definition of vaccine no longer applies. Vaccines no longer need to be effective at preventing the spread of a disease.

Why Would a person who wants to reduce the population want a vaccine that would help people live longer?

https://newschecker.in/fact-check/bill-gates-2010-ted-talk-on-vaccines

Not single leftist vermin has defended this. Amazing
 
"Hey everyone may I have your attention? Thank you. Yes I developed the vaccines to reduce the population. Thank you for participating."

:rofl2:
 
Defend what? He never advocated killing people to reduce the population.

God you guys are why the GQP and Trump love you. You are so easily manipulated. It's sad.

You are correct, and if “copy” had actually read the article it is in fact debunking the innuendo that he did

“ A snippet from Bill Gates’ TED TALK is shared in a misleading context. He did not suggest that vaccines can be used to control the global population.”

Funny
 
Bill Gates has long been a proponent of population control. Below is an article that tries to defend Bill Gates bloodlust for killing people. The article was written to "fact check" a claim that billy boy wants to use vaccines to reduce the population. The essential part of the Ted talk gates gave is this:

“The world today has 6.8 billion people. That’s headed up to about nine billion. Now, if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by, perhaps, 10 or 15 percent. But there, we see an increase of about 1.3.”

Now the counter claim in defense of Darth Gates is that the words were taken out of context. Isn't that always the way. They claim he was talking about reducing population to reduce the carbon footprint but didn't want to use vaccines to do it even though that's what he said. So their argument is it's out of context therefore it's misleading. But is it?

He clearly wants to rescue the population. That doesnt appear to be in dispute. A side question I have is why do we give a shit what a computer programmer wants in regards to the world population?

So he wants the population lowered. That's a given. Only a moron could disagree. So with that as a backdrop when he says "...if we do a really great job on new vaccines...". What should we suspect a "really great job" means to someone who wants the population reduced? Don't vaccines supposedly save lives? Oh that's right the old definition of vaccine no longer applies. Vaccines no longer need to be effective at preventing the spread of a disease.

Why Would a person who wants to reduce the population want a vaccine that would help people live longer?

https://newschecker.in/fact-check/bill-gates-2010-ted-talk-on-vaccines

How do you assholes ever come in from the rain and cold?

You, and people like you, are as naïve and simple-minded as it is possible to get. When I read your posts, I never know whether to cringe first and pity you afterwards...or to do the cringing after feeling sympathy for the misery filled lives you live.
 
Bill Gates has long been a proponent of population control. Below is an article that tries to defend Bill Gates bloodlust for killing people. The article was written to "fact check" a claim that billy boy wants to use vaccines to reduce the population. The essential part of the Ted talk gates gave is this:

“The world today has 6.8 billion people. That’s headed up to about nine billion. Now, if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by, perhaps, 10 or 15 percent. But there, we see an increase of about 1.3.”

Now the counter claim in defense of Darth Gates is that the words were taken out of context. Isn't that always the way. They claim he was talking about reducing population to reduce the carbon footprint but didn't want to use vaccines to do it even though that's what he said. So their argument is it's out of context therefore it's misleading. But is it?

He clearly wants to rescue the population. That doesnt appear to be in dispute. A side question I have is why do we give a shit what a computer programmer wants in regards to the world population?

So he wants the population lowered. That's a given. Only a moron could disagree. So with that as a backdrop when he says "...if we do a really great job on new vaccines...". What should we suspect a "really great job" means to someone who wants the population reduced? Don't vaccines supposedly save lives? Oh that's right the old definition of vaccine no longer applies. Vaccines no longer need to be effective at preventing the spread of a disease.

Why Would a person who wants to reduce the population want a vaccine that would help people live longer?

https://newschecker.in/fact-check/bill-gates-2010-ted-talk-on-vaccines

SciCheck Digest

In a 2010 TED Talk focused on developing new technologies to drastically reduce carbon dioxide emissions, Bill Gates briefly mentioned reducing the rate of population growth. A conspiratorial video circulating on Facebook misleadingly edits Gates’ talk to suggest his “wish” was to depopulate the planet through vaccines.
Full Story

A Facebook video viewed more than 100,000 times is using a deceptively edited clip of Bill Gates to accuse the Microsoft co-founder of advocating for a nefarious plan to depopulate the world through vaccines.

The video — captioned, “Take a look at this #DepopulationAgenda” — employs a computer-generated voiceover that suggests Gates and other high-profile philanthropists want to remove some portion of the global population. The same video*was uploaded to YouTube in April 2020, as misinformation relating to Gates swirled on social media.

The Facebook version includes ominous music and is presented as a meme, adding an apocalyptic image of a syringe in front of a pile of skulls to further imply a deadly plan is afoot. The narration tells viewers it will use quotes directly from “Bill Gates himself so that later no one will accuse me of allegedly distorting his words.” But then it does just that.*

The video misleadingly edits Gates’ 2010 TED Talk — “Innovating to zero!” — which focused on the need to zero out carbon dioxide emissions through new approaches to energy production in order to fight climate change. Ignoring Gates’ theme of energy innovation, the video misleadingly portrays the speech as evidence of a purported “depopulation” agenda that involves COVID-19 and the global vaccination efforts of Gates, the World Health Organization and pharmaceutical companies.

Before showing parts of Gates’ 2010 talk, the video presents part of a 2009 story in the Guardian that reported that Gates and other billionaire philanthropists had met and discussed overpopulation as a serious issue facing the world. But*that was only one topic discussed. The video ignores that the group reportedly discussed a range of other issues, too — including education, government reform and the economic crisis at that time.

It’s also worth noting — since the Facebook video doesn’t — that the same Guardian story also reported that a Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation vaccination project — Gavi, The Vaccine Alliance — was estimated at the time “to have prevented 3.4 million deaths in just eight years.”

After its selective use of the Guardian article, the video then goes on to show a clip from Gates’ 2010 TED Talk as he was discussing the amount of carbon dioxide produced each year around the world.

Bill Gates, “Innovating to zero!”: …over 26 billion tons. For each American, it’s about 20 tons. For people in poor countries, it’s less than one ton. It’s an average of about five tons for everyone on the planet. And somehow, we have to make changes that will bring that down to zero. It’s been constantly going up. It’s only various economic changes that have even flattened it at all, so we have to go from rapidly rising to falling, and falling all the way to zero.

This equation has four factors, a little bit of multiplication.*So you’ve got a thing on the left, CO2, that you want to get to zero,*and that’s going to be based on the number of people,*the services each person is using on average,*the energy, on average, for each service,*and the CO2 being put out per unit of energy.*So let’s look at each one of these,*and see how we can get this down to zero.*Probably, one of these numbers is going to have to get pretty near to zero.

That’s back from high school algebra.*But let’s take a look.

First, we’ve got population. The world today has 6.8 billion people. That’s headed up to about nine billion. Now, if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by, perhaps, 10 or 15%. But there, we see an increase of about 1.3.

That portion of Gates’ talk has spawned a false narrative that has persisted over the years that argues Gates was calling for the killing of millions of people by using vaccines — a narrative that the Facebook video again revisits.

It’s clear, however, that Gates was referring once again to his belief that improving health and reducing child deaths, including through vaccines, can have the effect of limiting future population growth — which he has talked about many other times.

In 2012, he again spoke about the need in underdeveloped countries to provide family planning services and better health care to decrease child mortality in order to deal with overpopulation. Similarly, in 2018, Melinda Gates, his wife and co-founder of the couple’s foundation, said: “When more children live past the age of 5, and when mothers can decide if and when to have children, population sizes don’t go up. They go down. Parents have fewer children when they’re confident those children will survive into adulthood.”

Bill Gates went on in his full, unedited TED Talk to spend most of his time focusing on the need to drastically reduce carbon dioxide emissions through innovation in energy production. For example, he spoke about one venture he backs that aims to create more efficient nuclear energy by using the waste created by current nuclear reactors.

But the video on Facebook cuts all of that — nearly 13 minutes in total — and moves directly from Gates briefly referencing the prospect of limiting population growth rate to his saying it’s his “wish” for such a technology. It provides no context for viewers to understand what hoped-for technology he was referencing.

The edited video picks up his talk here:

Bill Gates, “Innovating to zero!”: So this is a wish. It’s a very concrete wish that we invent this technology. If you gave me only one wish for the next 50 years — I could pick who’s president, I could pick a vaccine, which is something I love, or I could pick that this thing that’s half the cost with no CO2 gets invented — this is the wish I would pick. This is the one with the greatest impact. If we don’t get this wish, the division between the people who think short term and long term will be terrible, between the US and China, between poor countries and rich, and most of all, the lives of those two billion will be far worse.

“So what have we heard from Bill?” the video voiceover says. “Global warming — which is supposedly caused by anthropogenic carbon emission — and to reset it, you need to slightly reduce the world’s population.”

As we said, Gates briefly suggested that health care and vaccines could reduce the rate at which the population grows — but he didn’t propose killing off humans, as the video implies. His focus in the Ted Talk was on reducing carbon dioxide emissions by transforming the energy sector — something this misleading video leaves on the cutting-room floor.

The full TED Talk can be seen here:


https://www.factcheck.org/2021/03/scicheck-video-targets-gates-with-old-clip-misleading-edit/
 
SciCheck Digest

In a 2010 TED Talk focused on developing new technologies to drastically reduce carbon dioxide emissions, Bill Gates briefly mentioned reducing the rate of population growth. A conspiratorial video circulating on Facebook misleadingly edits Gates’ talk to suggest his “wish” was to depopulate the planet through vaccines.
Full Story

A Facebook video viewed more than 100,000 times is using a deceptively edited clip of Bill Gates to accuse the Microsoft co-founder of advocating for a nefarious plan to depopulate the world through vaccines.

The video — captioned, “Take a look at this #DepopulationAgenda” — employs a computer-generated voiceover that suggests Gates and other high-profile philanthropists want to remove some portion of the global population. The same video*was uploaded to YouTube in April 2020, as misinformation relating to Gates swirled on social media.

The Facebook version includes ominous music and is presented as a meme, adding an apocalyptic image of a syringe in front of a pile of skulls to further imply a deadly plan is afoot. The narration tells viewers it will use quotes directly from “Bill Gates himself so that later no one will accuse me of allegedly distorting his words.” But then it does just that.*

The video misleadingly edits Gates’ 2010 TED Talk — “Innovating to zero!” — which focused on the need to zero out carbon dioxide emissions through new approaches to energy production in order to fight climate change. Ignoring Gates’ theme of energy innovation, the video misleadingly portrays the speech as evidence of a purported “depopulation” agenda that involves COVID-19 and the global vaccination efforts of Gates, the World Health Organization and pharmaceutical companies.

Before showing parts of Gates’ 2010 talk, the video presents part of a 2009 story in the Guardian that reported that Gates and other billionaire philanthropists had met and discussed overpopulation as a serious issue facing the world. But*that was only one topic discussed. The video ignores that the group reportedly discussed a range of other issues, too — including education, government reform and the economic crisis at that time.

It’s also worth noting — since the Facebook video doesn’t — that the same Guardian story also reported that a Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation vaccination project — Gavi, The Vaccine Alliance — was estimated at the time “to have prevented 3.4 million deaths in just eight years.”

After its selective use of the Guardian article, the video then goes on to show a clip from Gates’ 2010 TED Talk as he was discussing the amount of carbon dioxide produced each year around the world.

Bill Gates, “Innovating to zero!”: …over 26 billion tons. For each American, it’s about 20 tons. For people in poor countries, it’s less than one ton. It’s an average of about five tons for everyone on the planet. And somehow, we have to make changes that will bring that down to zero. It’s been constantly going up. It’s only various economic changes that have even flattened it at all, so we have to go from rapidly rising to falling, and falling all the way to zero.

This equation has four factors, a little bit of multiplication.*So you’ve got a thing on the left, CO2, that you want to get to zero,*and that’s going to be based on the number of people,*the services each person is using on average,*the energy, on average, for each service,*and the CO2 being put out per unit of energy.*So let’s look at each one of these,*and see how we can get this down to zero.*Probably, one of these numbers is going to have to get pretty near to zero.

That’s back from high school algebra.*But let’s take a look.

First, we’ve got population. The world today has 6.8 billion people. That’s headed up to about nine billion. Now, if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by, perhaps, 10 or 15%. But there, we see an increase of about 1.3.

That portion of Gates’ talk has spawned a false narrative that has persisted over the years that argues Gates was calling for the killing of millions of people by using vaccines — a narrative that the Facebook video again revisits.

It’s clear, however, that Gates was referring once again to his belief that improving health and reducing child deaths, including through vaccines, can have the effect of limiting future population growth — which he has talked about many other times.

In 2012, he again spoke about the need in underdeveloped countries to provide family planning services and better health care to decrease child mortality in order to deal with overpopulation. Similarly, in 2018, Melinda Gates, his wife and co-founder of the couple’s foundation, said: “When more children live past the age of 5, and when mothers can decide if and when to have children, population sizes don’t go up. They go down. Parents have fewer children when they’re confident those children will survive into adulthood.”

Bill Gates went on in his full, unedited TED Talk to spend most of his time focusing on the need to drastically reduce carbon dioxide emissions through innovation in energy production. For example, he spoke about one venture he backs that aims to create more efficient nuclear energy by using the waste created by current nuclear reactors.

But the video on Facebook cuts all of that — nearly 13 minutes in total — and moves directly from Gates briefly referencing the prospect of limiting population growth rate to his saying it’s his “wish” for such a technology. It provides no context for viewers to understand what hoped-for technology he was referencing.

The edited video picks up his talk here:

Bill Gates, “Innovating to zero!”: So this is a wish. It’s a very concrete wish that we invent this technology. If you gave me only one wish for the next 50 years — I could pick who’s president, I could pick a vaccine, which is something I love, or I could pick that this thing that’s half the cost with no CO2 gets invented — this is the wish I would pick. This is the one with the greatest impact. If we don’t get this wish, the division between the people who think short term and long term will be terrible, between the US and China, between poor countries and rich, and most of all, the lives of those two billion will be far worse.

“So what have we heard from Bill?” the video voiceover says. “Global warming — which is supposedly caused by anthropogenic carbon emission — and to reset it, you need to slightly reduce the world’s population.”

As we said, Gates briefly suggested that health care and vaccines could reduce the rate at which the population grows — but he didn’t propose killing off humans, as the video implies. His focus in the Ted Talk was on reducing carbon dioxide emissions by transforming the energy sector — something this misleading video leaves on the cutting-room floor.

The full TED Talk can be seen here:


https://www.factcheck.org/2021/03/scicheck-video-targets-gates-with-old-clip-misleading-edit/

He wants to use a "vaccine" to decrease the population. So far so good for billy boy
 
Some very smart people think that population has peaked, that it is down for as far as the eye can see. Elon is one.
 
You should be and again why does it matter what a computer programmer thinks about the population?

Because he is using the gobs of money he has skimmed off of the society to bent us to his will, and there is very little indication that this will lead to a good result. Hitch once said "At the very least resist tyranny" and I suspect that this applies here.
 
Because he is using the gobs of money he has skimmed off of the society to bent us to his will, and there is very little indication that this will lead to a good result. Hitch once said "At the very least resist tyranny" and I suspect that this applies here.

I couldn't agree more but we have too many leftist educated nitwits. This board is a prime example of that.
 
He wants to use a "vaccine" to decrease the population. So far so good for billy boy

That's not what he said! END OF STORY!

Have a sissy fit- It looks good on you!

I'll just keep proving you are a God Damn Liar!

You are like Donnie Boy sayin', "Are you gonna believe me, or YOUR LYIN' EYES"!

"There ain't no way to hide your lyin' eyes" [Glenn Frey/Don Henley]

Thanks for helping me make my case!
 
That's not what he said! END OF STORY!

Have a sissy fit- It looks good on you!

I'll just keep proving you are a God Damn Liar!

You are like Donnie Boy sayin', "Are you gonna believe me, or YOUR LYIN' EYES"!

"There ain't no way to hide your lyin' eyes" [Glenn Frey/Don Henley]

Thanks for helping me make my case!

That is what he said. Showed where he said it. You don't like it and I don't give a shit.
 
He wants to use a "vaccine" to decrease the population. So far so good for billy boy

"Hey guys! I created the vaccine to kill people to reduce the population! Thanks for participating!"

You are so dumb it hurts everyone. Do us all a favor and eliminate yourself from the gene pool.
 
He wants to use a "vaccine" to decrease the population. So far so good for billy boy

Wrong, and as I noted above, your own source debunked the claim

You are just making up as you go along, and incorrectly, grossly incorrectly, I might add
 
Wrong, and as I noted above, your own source debunked the claim

You are just making up as you go along, and incorrectly, grossly incorrectly, I might add

You didn't prove thing unless as I said you used the new definition of "vaccine". Vaccines used to keep people alive but no more.
 
That is what he said. Showed where he said it. You don't like it and I don't give a shit.

OK Yak! I'll agree with you that Gates left himself wide open to be taken out of context.

I wouldn't have ever made it look like that Humans are responsible for creating Carbon Dioxide! I mean, we can't just hold our breath forever now, can we?

I would have been more on the case, that because of all the deforestation going on in the world due to HUMANS- our Carbon Dioxide vs. Oxygen levels in our atmosphere got out of wack!

I hope this helps!
 
Last edited:
Back
Top