Meta to get rid of factcheckers and recommend more political content

H

Hume

Verified User
Meta will get rid of factcheckers, “dramatically reduce the amount of censorship” and recommend more political content on its platforms, including Facebook, Instagram and Threads, founder Mark Zuckerberg has announced.

www.theguardian.com

Meta to get rid of factcheckers and recommend more political content

Mark Zuckerberg says company will ‘dramatically reduce censorship’ across Facebook, Instagram and Threads
www.theguardian.com www.theguardian.com

This is why I ignore all posts from social media.
 
Hume said:
Meta will get rid of factcheckers, “dramatically reduce the amount of censorship” and recommend more political content on its platforms, including Facebook, Instagram and Threads, founder Mark Zuckerberg has announced.

www.theguardian.com

Meta to get rid of factcheckers and recommend more political content

Mark Zuckerberg says company will ‘dramatically reduce censorship’ across Facebook, Instagram and Threads
www.theguardian.com www.theguardian.com

This is why I ignore all posts from social media.
Click to expand...
I am sure your sage comments are missed.

BTW, you forgot Dana White was just added to the board at META.
 
It probably would have helped if they had people who could actually factcheck to begin with...

7cyxdp.jpg
 
BartenderElite said:
What do you think fact-checking entails?
Click to expand...
At Facebook determining if the post's content agrees with the "factchecker's" political, social, scientific, or whatever, opinion. That's how most, if not all, factchecking works. All "factchecking" really is is just a facade to try and lend a layer of extra credibility to somebody's opinion.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
At Facebook determining if the post's content agrees with the "factchecker's" political, social, scientific, or whatever, opinion. That's how most, if not all, factchecking works. All "factchecking" really is is just a facade to try and lend a layer of extra credibility to somebody's opinion.
Click to expand...
Trump speaks and that is how you judge a fact.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
At Facebook determining if the post's content agrees with the "factchecker's" political, social, scientific, or whatever, opinion. That's how most, if not all, factchecking works. All "factchecking" really is is just a facade to try and lend a layer of extra credibility to somebody's opinion.
Click to expand...

So, we shouldn't have factcheckers at any media outlets?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top