Minnesota Senate race...

Dungheap said:
Look at the original post. You keep repeating the same shit over and over and over again. And why is the burden on me? You are the guy that keeps repeating it. Shouldn't you make sure it is true?

Here's a hint: start with the lawsuit that the Coleman campaign filed. Surely if there are 25 precincts in MN with more votes than voters this would be featured prominently in their complaint along with evidence supporting the claim. Start with Exhibit E. And keep in mind that his is the best that Coleman' got, not that it is true.
Click to expand...

I provided an article for discussion. You made the claim that the information in the article was false... Either back that up with evidence or shut your ass.
 
Superfreak said:
I provided an article for discussion. You made the claim that the information in the article was false... Either back that up with evidence or shut your ass.
Click to expand...


WASILLA, AK - Records and eyewitnesses have come to light that prior to announcing her candidacy for the Vice Presidency; Sarah Palin shot a Bigfoot from a helicopter.

A government helicopter was seen flying low over the Chugach National Park with what witnesses described as “a sexy librarian shooting out the side.” Employees at a local bait shop report seeing a similar woman only hours before carrying an infant in a camouflage Baby Bjorn.

The Bigfoot, or Sasquatch as it is known in scientific circles, was found dead on the outskirts of the park, just south of Wasilla, Alaska. Preliminary forensics reports confirm that an adult male Sasquatch was shot in the face with Palin’s trademark 5mm M4 Carbine Assault Rifle.
Click to expand...

Just posting an article for discussion . . .


http://weeklyworldnews.com/celebs/palin-bags-a-bigfoot/
 
Superfreak said:
translation: "no I do not have any evidence to back up my claim"

Thanks Dung. We appreciate your honesty.
Click to expand...


I guess what you don't understand in the dynamic we have going on here is that I have not made a claim. I merely called bullshit (shenanigans if you prefer) on the claims that you have posted (repeatedly). I'm simply asking you to back up the claim that 25 precincts have more votes than voters. It shouldn't be too tough with Coleman having filed a lawsuit and all.

Oh, and if you want back up for the claims in my article, I've got a picture, which is more than you've got:

palinkillsbigfoot.jpg
 
Dungheap said:
I guess what you don't understand in the dynamic we have going on here is that I have not made a claim. I merely called bullshit (shenanigans if you prefer) on the claims that you have posted (repeatedly). I'm simply asking you to back up the claim that 25 precincts have more votes than voters. It shouldn't be too tough with Coleman having filed a lawsuit and all.

Oh, and if you want back up for the claims in my article, I've got a picture, which is more than you've got:

]
Click to expand...


Again moron... you need to comprehend the concept of IF/THEN comments. It might help keep your panties out of a bunch.
 
maineman said:
you believe? so? what proof do you have that the recount was skewed in favor of Franken?
Click to expand...

The only way anyone would ever know would be if during the recount all recounted ballots would have to be stamped with the name of the candidate for who the vote is counted. That way any controversial votes could later be contested.

I'm sure you have seen the article that went around claiming that the votes were being unfairly decided for Franken during the recount. It showed (according to the author) that a small dot in the Franken box but a completely blacked out spot for Coleman on the same ballot was counted for Franken. Well, as that is, we can not tell whether that is true or not. For all we know the author is not being honest. But, if the ballot was stamped, either "Franken" or "Coleman" then later it could be contested if necessary and decided by the courts.

Immie
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top