Miranda Devine: Trump derangement syndrome drives deep-state leakers, CNN to treasonous lengths to deny prez a victory

[Truth Detector]

Wonderful and intelligent journalist. Too bad there are none like her in the FAKE media.

Miranda Devine: Trump derangement syndrome drives deep-state leakers, CNN to treasonous lengths to deny prez a victory​

How deranged are the Trump-deranged?

Are the deep-state leakers and their Democratic media mouthpieces so blinded by their hatred for the president that they will go to treasonous lengths just to deny him a victory?

Or are they simply hellbent on provoking a full-scale war with Iran?

CNN’s exclusive report of a leaked top secret US intelligence assessment from the Defense Intelligence Agency on Tuesday suggested that the weekend B-2 bunker-buster sortie in Iran was a flop.

This conveniently contradicted Trump’s claim that it was a “spectacular military success” that had “completely and totally obliterated” Iran’s key nuclear enrichment facilities and overshadowed the startlingly good news that the president had somehow pulled off a cease-fire between Iran and Israel, which was still holding more than 40 hours later, when we went to press.

If the aim of CNN and its toxic leakers was to enrage Trump, it worked, with the president venting ever since on social media, on Air Force One to the traveling press corps and in a press conference in The Hague, where he called CNN “fake news.”

He has a point.

Among the intelligence community, regard for DIA analysis is so low that the nickname for the agency is “Do It Again.”

The CNN exclusive was written by none other than Natasha Bertrand, the same CIA stenographer who scooped the dishonest Dirty 51 letter by 51 former intelligence officials back in October 2020 falsely claiming that Hunter Biden’s laptop was Russian disinformation.

Miranda Devine: Trump derangement syndrome drives deep-state leakers, CNN to treasonous lengths to deny prez a victory

The deep state leakers and their Democrat media mouthpieces are so blinded by their hatred for the president that they will go to treasonous lengths just to deny him a victory.

nypost.com

 

[Truth Detector]

Dishonest spin ​

The FBI is hot on the trail of the leaker or leakers of the DIA report, with US special Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff accusing CNN’s anonymous deep-state sources of “treason.”

But CNN’s dishonest spin of the intelligence assessment was just as egregious.

The DIA came out later to say it was a “preliminary, low confidence” assessment done in the early hours after the strike and that the analysis was so equivocal, it said the impact of the strikes could be “limited or it could be very severe,” as Trump told reporters at The Hague Wednesday.

CNN just ignored the uncertain nature of the DIA findings and failed to report the contradictory assessments within the report that suggested Trump was right.

But never mind.

CNN’s misleading reporting, soon amplified by the New York Times, gave the rest of the resistance media hours of gleeful raining on Trump’s parade.

God forbid that their audience consider Trump might be a step closer to achieving the ever-elusive peace in the Middle East.

The same Negative Nellies, now chortling that boastful Trump had failed to set back Iran’s nuclear ambitions more than a couple of months, were claiming last week that the president was exaggerating the threat because Iran was nowhere near getting nuclear capability.

They can’t make up their minds because they don’t have any thoughts of their own other than whatever Trump says, they’re against.

Within a day, the CIA, the Israeli Atomic Energy Commission and even Iranian assessments contradicted the CNN story with battlefield assessments involving actual on-the-ground human and signal intelligence from Iran to say the US strike on Iran’s underground Fordow nuclear plant was “devastating.”

Iran’s Foreign Ministry admitted its nuclear sites were “badly damaged.”

 

[Truth Detector]

Bogus reporting ​

She has been at the center of all the bogus Russiagate reporting about Trump, beginning with the fake Steele dossier, aka “pee tape,” during her time at Business Insider and later at The Atlantic and Politico, where she was national security correspondent at the tender age of 26.

She was quickly rewarded for her unverified beat-ups on MSNBC, where she became a paid contributor.

The fact that most of her reporting was later debunked or proven to be misleading did nothing to hurt her career.

Quite the opposite.

She was rewarded for never admitting she was wrong, including when the Mueller report debunked Russiagate and when her CIA-sourced story (designed to sabotage Trump’s plan to withdraw from Afghanistan in his first term), that Russia had paid bounties to the Taliban for the death of US soldiers, fell apart.

“Even a cursory review of Bertrand’s prolific output reveals an endless array of gossip, conspiracy and speculative assertions masquerading as journalism,” independent journalist Glenn Greenwald once wrote. “There was arguably nobody in media other than Rachel Maddow who promoted and ratified that [Russiagate] hoax as aggressively, uncritically and persistently as Bertrand.”

Even Washington Post media critic Erik Wemple, no Trump fan, has criticized Bertrand for her “thumb-on-scale speculation” and “boosterism” of the Steele dossier in an article titled, “How Politico’s Natasha Bertrand bootstrapped dossier credulity into MSNBC gig.”

Until now, Bertrand and her employers have been rewarded for their uncritical promotion of malign CIA saboteurs.

But the plummeting ratings at CNN and the resistance media’s collective loss of public trust suggest their time is running out.

And finally, the leakers face the real possibility of being outed and held to account.

 

[Jade Dragon]

Who's more special needs, Truthie for posting, or Miranda for saying?

 

[archives]

Who's more special needs, Truthie for posting, or Miranda for saying?

It’s Murdoch’s NYP, probably was repeated on Murdoch’s Fox as a “breaking story,” lemmings as “truthie” swallow anything Trump or his surrogates pedal

 

[archives]

Dishonest spin ​

The FBI is hot on the trail of the leaker or leakers of the DIA report, with US special Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff accusing CNN’s anonymous deep-state sources of “treason.”

But CNN’s dishonest spin of the intelligence assessment was just as egregious.

The DIA came out later to say it was a “preliminary, low confidence” assessment done in the early hours after the strike and that the analysis was so equivocal, it said the impact of the strikes could be “limited or it could be very severe,” as Trump told reporters at The Hague Wednesday.

CNN just ignored the uncertain nature of the DIA findings and failed to report the contradictory assessments within the report that suggested Trump was right.

But never mind.

CNN’s misleading reporting, soon amplified by the New York Times, gave the rest of the resistance media hours of gleeful raining on Trump’s parade.

God forbid that their audience consider Trump might be a step closer to achieving the ever-elusive peace in the Middle East.

The same Negative Nellies, now chortling that boastful Trump had failed to set back Iran’s nuclear ambitions more than a couple of months, were claiming last week that the president was exaggerating the threat because Iran was nowhere near getting nuclear capability.

They can’t make up their minds because they don’t have any thoughts of their own other than whatever Trump says, they’re against.

Within a day, the CIA, the Israeli Atomic Energy Commission and even Iranian assessments contradicted the CNN story with battlefield assessments involving actual on-the-ground human and signal intelligence from Iran to say the US strike on Iran’s underground Fordow nuclear plant was “devastating.”

Iran’s Foreign Ministry admitted its nuclear sites were “badly damaged.”

So does that must mean Trump picked Admiral Cooper, who is US Commander or the Military in the ME, is also Deep State and a traitor since he confirmed the report?

 

[Truth Detector]

Who's more special needs, Truthie for posting, or Miranda for saying?

You for being such a brainless dumbass.

 

[Truth Detector]

It’s Murdoch’s NYP, probably was repeated on Murdoch’s Fox as a “breaking story,”

So, was there anything you disagreed with or thought was not factual in the article? Or are you just here to cry like a brianless little babbling buffoon?

lemmings as “truthie” swallow anything Trump or his surrogates pedal

There you go with the stupid lies and projection as usual.

 

[Truth Detector]

So does that must mean Trump picked Admiral Cooper, who is US Commander or the Military in the ME, is also Deep State and a traitor since he confirmed the report?

Incomprehensible word salad. Try again, only this time using coherent sentences and good grammar.

 

[AProudLefty]

Wonderful and intelligent journalist. Too bad there are none like her in the FAKE media.

Miranda Devine: Trump derangement syndrome drives deep-state leakers, CNN to treasonous lengths to deny prez a victory​

How deranged are the Trump-deranged?

Are the deep-state leakers and their Democratic media mouthpieces so blinded by their hatred for the president that they will go to treasonous lengths just to deny him a victory?

Or are they simply hellbent on provoking a full-scale war with Iran?

CNN’s exclusive report of a leaked top secret US intelligence assessment from the Defense Intelligence Agency on Tuesday suggested that the weekend B-2 bunker-buster sortie in Iran was a flop.

This conveniently contradicted Trump’s claim that it was a “spectacular military success” that had “completely and totally obliterated” Iran’s key nuclear enrichment facilities and overshadowed the startlingly good news that the president had somehow pulled off a cease-fire between Iran and Israel, which was still holding more than 40 hours later, when we went to press.

If the aim of CNN and its toxic leakers was to enrage Trump, it worked, with the president venting ever since on social media, on Air Force One to the traveling press corps and in a press conference in The Hague, where he called CNN “fake news.”

He has a point.

Among the intelligence community, regard for DIA analysis is so low that the nickname for the agency is “Do It Again.”

The CNN exclusive was written by none other than Natasha Bertrand, the same CIA stenographer who scooped the dishonest Dirty 51 letter by 51 former intelligence officials back in October 2020 falsely claiming that Hunter Biden’s laptop was Russian disinformation.

Miranda Devine: Trump derangement syndrome drives deep-state leakers, CNN to treasonous lengths to deny prez a victory

The deep state leakers and their Democrat media mouthpieces are so blinded by their hatred for the president that they will go to treasonous lengths just to deny him a victory.

nypost.com

Oh use your own words.

 

[archives]

So, was there anything you disagreed with or thought was not factual in the article? Or are you just here to cry like a brianless little babbling buffoon?



There you go with the stupid lies and projection as usual.

How would I know, I’m not Black, nor know the stresses particularly to Black Americans, neither are you

Not “lies or projections,” ain’t the left that believes the only news site that has been caught flat out lying to the tune of three quarters of a billion dollars with additional similar civil suits pending

 

[Truth Detector]

Oh use your own words.

I wish you would and address the topic. But you can't. The reason is simple. You're a low IQ, mentally deranged sociopathic lying hypocrite on steroids who cannot think for himself.

As I said in the first thread, a wonderful and intelligent journalist. Too bad there are none like her in the FAKE media. You could learn a lot if you tried reading the article and had a brain large enough to comprehend the obvious.

But alas, here is all you are good at, much like arsecheese:

 

[Truth Detector]

How would I know, I’m not Black, nor know the stresses particularly to Black Americans, neither are you

WTF does this have to do with blacks? Another reason one cannot argue with brainless morons.

Not “lies or projections,” ain’t the left that believes the only news site that has been caught flat out lying to the tune of three quarters of a billion dollars with additional similar civil suits pending

So, you don't think the legacy media has been lying to you for decades? Another reason you're such a clueless, low IQ dumbass.

Did you think the Russia Collusion hoax was real? Did you believe them when they claimed the Hunter laptop was fake?

The list of lies you've been fed like a gullible dumbfuck is long.

 

[archives]

WTF does this have to do with blacks? Another reason one cannot argue with brainless morons.



So, you don't think the legacy media has been lying to you for decades? Another reason you're such a clueless, low IQ dumbass.

Did you think the Russia Collusion hoax was real? Did you believe them when they claimed the Hunter laptop was fake?

The list of lies you've been fed like a gullible dumbfuck is long.

Ah, if a Black guy says he feels certain stresses unique to being Black you telling us you understand and emphasize with what he is expressing

Purposely lying by design, not often enough to note, as I said, now if them ever had to shell out three quarters of a billion dollars for getting caught flat out lying

Yes, the Trump campaign didn’t meet with Russians over 125 times to discuss the weather. Junior, Jared, and Paul weren’t eagerly anticipated meeting in Trump Tower with Russians to talk about adoptions

They didn’t report the laptop was fake, rather questioned some of the material supposedly coming off it especially since the only one with direct access to it was “the truth ain’t the Truth” Rudi

You can’t even recognize truth from lies

 

[Truth Detector]

Ah, if a Black guy says he feels certain stresses unique to being Black you telling us you understand and emphasize with what he is expressing

This topic isn't about black people you brainless dumbass.

Purposely lying by design, not often enough to note, as I said, now if them ever had to shell out three quarters of a billion dollars for getting caught flat out lying

More invcoherent word salad. I don't have the slightest idea what you are trying to say. I don't think you do either.

Yes, the Trump campaign didn’t meet with Russians over 125 times to discuss the weather.

Where do you come up with such buffoonish claims. Let's see a link to where you are indoctrinated with this nonsense.

Junior, Jared, and Paul weren’t eagerly anticipated meeting in Trump Tower with Russians to talk about adoptions

Again, what does this have to do with the topic?

They didn’t report the laptop was fake, rather questioned some of the material supposedly coming off it especially since the only one with direct access to it was “the truth ain’t the Truth” Rudi

That is a dumb lie. The claim was that it was Russian disinformation, and they didn't take it seriously.

In fact, Miranda, the author here, broke the story in the New York Post. She was attacked for it. Much like brainless muddle headed little fools like you do here.

You can’t even recognize truth from lies

You're projecting now small brained little man.

Projection

The process of displacing one’s feelings onto a different person, animal, or object. The term is most commonly used to describe defensive projection—attributing one’s own unacceptable urges to another.

 

[Matt Dillon]

Bogus reporting ​

She has been at the center of all the bogus Russiagate reporting about Trump, beginning with the fake Steele dossier, aka “pee tape,” during her time at Business Insider and later at The Atlantic and Politico, where she was national security correspondent at the tender age of 26.

She was quickly rewarded for her unverified beat-ups on MSNBC, where she became a paid contributor.

The fact that most of her reporting was later debunked or proven to be misleading did nothing to hurt her career.

Quite the opposite.

She was rewarded for never admitting she was wrong, including when the Mueller report debunked Russiagate and when her CIA-sourced story (designed to sabotage Trump’s plan to withdraw from Afghanistan in his first term), that Russia had paid bounties to the Taliban for the death of US soldiers, fell apart.

“Even a cursory review of Bertrand’s prolific output reveals an endless array of gossip, conspiracy and speculative assertions masquerading as journalism,” independent journalist Glenn Greenwald once wrote. “There was arguably nobody in media other than Rachel Maddow who promoted and ratified that [Russiagate] hoax as aggressively, uncritically and persistently as Bertrand.”

Even Washington Post media critic Erik Wemple, no Trump fan, has criticized Bertrand for her “thumb-on-scale speculation” and “boosterism” of the Steele dossier in an article titled, “How Politico’s Natasha Bertrand bootstrapped dossier credulity into MSNBC gig.”

Until now, Bertrand and her employers have been rewarded for their uncritical promotion of malign CIA saboteurs.

But the plummeting ratings at CNN and the resistance media’s collective loss of public trust suggest their time is running out.

And finally, the leakers face the real possibility of being outed and held to account.

Who's more special needs, Truthie for posting, or Miranda for saying?

It’s Murdoch’s NYP, probably was repeated on Murdoch’s Fox as a “breaking story,” lemmings as “truthie” swallow anything Trump or his surrogates pedal

Oh use your own words.

The leakers will be found and arrested. Possibly the CNN reporter, too, and rightfully so.
They'll be having some Reality Winner moments.